Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Some Think Secession Is Un-American
The Bulletin ^ | 4-22-09 | Joe Murray

Posted on 04/22/2009 7:12:17 AM PDT by AmericanHunter

When Texas Gov. Rick Perry floated the idea of secession if the federal government continues to pursue an aggressive tax-and-spend policy, the mainstream media, as well as the political establishment, cringed.

MSNBC’s Chris Matthews called talk of secession “whack-job stuff,” calling Mr. Perry a “bozo” and telling the Texas governor, “You don’t have a choice buddy.” Mr. Matthews’ colleague, Rachael Maddow, said Mr. Perry was “flirting to the point of adultery” by talking about secession, while commentator Thomas Frank reinforced the disconnect between the media and many Americans.

“What you’re seeing … what is one of the surprising things about these tea parties … surprising to people like you and me, is how mainstream extremism is in the Republican Party and the conservative movement,” Mr. Frank, author of Wrecking Crew: How Conservatives Rule, told Ms. Maddow.

But is the idea of secession a foreign concept to the American experience? Is talk of secession automatically treasonous? Is any secessionist movement doomed to be defined by the Civil War and exiled to the political wilderness?

“I think the biggest surprise to me was the outrage expressed by an individual who even thinks ... along these lines,” U.S. Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, said yesterday on CNN’s American Morning.

“Because I heard people say, well, ‘this was treason,’ they say, and ‘this was un-American.’ But don’t they remember how we came in to our being? We used secession. We seceded from England. So it’s a very good principle. It’s a principle of a free society. It’s a shame we don’t have it anymore.”

Dr. Paul, who ran a hard fought grassroots campaign for the Republican nomination in 2008, argued the principle of secession is one that protects the union rather than threatens it.

“I argue that if you have the principle of secession, our federal government wouldn’t be as intrusive into state affairs. And to me, that would be very good,” Dr. Paul said. “We as a nation have endorsed secession all along. I mean, think of all the secession of the countries and the Republicans from the Soviet system. We were delighted. We love it. And yet we get hysterical over this.”

Critics of the coverage of the secession comment argue the media is trying to paint the Republican Party as extreme. They say Mr. Perry was not advocating secession, but rather saying the federal government could cause its resurrection.

“We got a great union. There’s absolutely no reason to dissolve it. But if Washington continues to thumb their nose at the American people, you know, who knows what might come out of that?” Mr. Perry asked.

While the notion of secession was floated by Mr. Perry, he was not expressly advocating Texas leave the Union. Rather, the Texas governor used the idea in a manner Dr. Paul believes is historically accurate — to send a warning shot across the bow of a federal government that is encroaching on state’s rights and individual liberties.

Last week’s tea parties exposed a major rift in the country, and some are concerned the Obama administration does not understand the degree of dissent that is fomenting outside the Beltway. And despite panning by the political establishment, the majority of the nation viewed tea party dissent in a favorable light.

Fifty-one percent of Americans had a favorable view of the nationwide rallies, while 32 percent responded their view was very favorable, according to a poll released by Rasmussen Reports. A third of the nation had an unfavorable view with 15 percent unsure.

But among the nation’s “Political Class,” Rasmussen found just 13 percent held a favorable assessment and zero percent held a very favorable view of the nationwide protest. This disconnect, according to Dr. Paul, is a major part of the problem.

“People are angry. And if we don’t sense that, we don’t know it’s actually what’s going on there,” the Texas congressman said. Dr. Paul said the worst is yet to come because secession will achieve a greater legitimacy as the country struggles.

“When the dollar collapses and the federal government can’t fulfill any of its promises, what if they send you dollars and they don’t work,” Dr. Paul said. “People are just going to — they’re not going to have a violent cessation. They’re just going to ignore the federal government because they will be inept.”


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government
KEYWORDS: cwii; enemedia; liberalmedia; lping; mediabias; msm; obamedia; ronpaul; secession; sedition; southernindependence; statesrights; treasonisthereason
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 461-464 next last
To: awake-n-angry
None of these are in the Constitution, any of these example covered by the 10th Amendment?

Methinks you've drifted from the sublime to the absurd.

G'night!

381 posted on 04/26/2009 8:04:18 PM PDT by DustyMoment (FloriDUH - proud inventors of pregnant/hanging chads and judicide!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies]

To: stand watie
Yes, which is why I brought up in my discussions in this thread of Obama's possible means of retaliation against seceding states.

If he is intent on going to such depths to subjugate Americans, it is even more important that we stand as one and not split our countrymen apart.

If we do not hang together, we will most assuredly hang separately. -Ben Franklin
382 posted on 04/26/2009 8:07:36 PM PDT by DangerZone (Union now, Union forever - Country first , Politics second)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 371 | View Replies]

To: AvOrdVet
Well, if those state politicians are so corrupt, how do you expect to get enough of them to vote for secession?

On the other hand, if you can elect enough statesman (as opposed to politicians), then why leave the Union anyway? Why not just stand up to Obama?
383 posted on 04/26/2009 8:13:29 PM PDT by DangerZone (Union now, Union forever - Country first , Politics second)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 376 | View Replies]

To: DangerZone; All
i, too, have lived all over the country. (i spent over 20 years posted to various areas of the US, while in the army.)

to SOME degree you are correct. otoh, there is a GULF between dixie & the north that can NEVER be made whole.

note the number of "RED states" & where they are versus the "BLUE states" & where they are. IF your state voted for bho & your congressional delegation is filled with DIMocRATS, don't tell me that your state has much in common with mine.

free dixie,sw

384 posted on 04/27/2009 9:48:44 AM PDT by stand watie (Resistance to TYRANTS is OBEDIENCE to God. T. Jefferson, 1804)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies]

To: stand watie
I do not see the gulf you are speaking of between rural Northerners and Southerners, at least not in political ideology. Sure our customs are different, but that is a small consideration in the big picture and faced with an opposition in the Obamatons who will not care whether someone is from the North, South, or West, just that we are conservatives and will resist them.

Regarding Red State vs. Blue State, if we go by the last election then parts of the Old South are already lost: Virginia, North Carolina, and Florida. In your haste to condemn all the blue state citizens for whom the majority of the voters chose, you are cutting off a huge chunk of those who would support conservative values and condemning them to a life of hell under Obama and his minions.

Will you do the same if your own state eventually goes blue? Or will you leave your home and family and friends and flee to a red state or even another country if things come to worse?

My point is that all real Americans are in this together whether we yet realize it or not. The left will make no distinction between us based on regional affiliation so neither should we. We (conservatives) are all in this together, and we will share the same fate be it descent into socialism or a rebirth of the Republic.

BTW, I am originally from New York state (small town), but now live in Oklahoma so I suppose my state does have quite a bit in common with yours.
385 posted on 04/27/2009 1:03:59 PM PDT by DangerZone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 384 | View Replies]

To: DangerZone
fyi, TX will NEVER "go BLUE". not now, not tomorrow, not ever.

come the DAY of SECESSION, we southerners (i believe) will be overwhelmed with northerners headed south, just as what happened when North & South Korea were partitioned.(hopefully, a LOT of "fair weather southerners" & "transplants" will also head NORTH about the same time.)

i do NOT condemn the CONSERVATIVES from "up there" for ANYTHING except staying!!! (Eva/Ari are you ladies listening???)

free dixie,sw

386 posted on 04/27/2009 2:27:39 PM PDT by stand watie (Resistance to TYRANTS is OBEDIENCE to God. T. Jefferson, 1804)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 385 | View Replies]

To: stand watie
As of now, even in Texas, only a quarter of the population support secession.If immigration trends continue as they are, particularly illegal immigration followed by amnesty, it will indeed go blue.

What about conservatives down here in the South that live in now blue states? Do you condemn them for staying also?
387 posted on 04/27/2009 3:02:04 PM PDT by DangerZone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 386 | View Replies]

To: catfish1957

At first I was going to let this post go without comment, but I just can’t. You sit there and imply I would be in danger for saying such a thing, but Texans themselves have allowed their state to be overrun with illegal aliens. Where is their courage and strength in dealing with an outright invasion from the third world? Ya’ll haven’t even passed laws to crackdown on illegals and their employers like we have done in Oklahoma, and yet you think that Texans are going to support secession?


388 posted on 04/27/2009 3:26:40 PM PDT by DangerZone
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 295 | View Replies]

To: DangerZone
you're dreaming. TEXAS will ALWAYS remain TEXAS & (should the WORST happen) TEXANS will fight for LIBERTY.

free dixie,sw

389 posted on 04/27/2009 7:54:36 PM PDT by stand watie (Resistance to TYRANTS is OBEDIENCE to God. T. Jefferson, 1804)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 387 | View Replies]

To: DangerZone
Just because those troops are from red state America does not mean they will disobey orders to suppress secession. Do you have anything other than that to back up your statement? Something more than a guess?

Suggestion. Study the civil war especially the mobilization part. For instance, the pro Southern soldiers and officers resigned their commisions/enlistments and were allowed to peacefully repatriate to their states. They then joined the CSA/CSN. This happened thousands of times.

390 posted on 04/28/2009 3:59:09 AM PDT by central_va (www.15thVirginia.org Co. C, Patrick Henry Rifles)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 379 | View Replies]

To: awake-n-angry

***Please cite the section of the Constitution that details the process of Secession.***

There isn’t one. The right exists and is protected by the 10th Amendment.


391 posted on 04/28/2009 6:36:26 AM PDT by djsherin (Government is essentially the negation of liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 333 | View Replies]

To: DangerZone

And what is that can of worms?


392 posted on 04/28/2009 9:32:56 AM PDT by djsherin (Government is essentially the negation of liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies]

To: DangerZone

Secession is a legal means.


393 posted on 04/28/2009 9:36:13 AM PDT by djsherin (Government is essentially the negation of liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 365 | View Replies]

To: DangerZone

Nullification before secession is a wonderful principle.


394 posted on 04/28/2009 9:37:01 AM PDT by djsherin (Government is essentially the negation of liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 359 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment; awake-n-angry

States have all powers not denied to the them by the Constitution. The federal government has only powers granted to it by the Constitution. Secession is not denied to the states... see the 10th Amendment.


395 posted on 04/28/2009 9:40:07 AM PDT by djsherin (Government is essentially the negation of liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: DustyMoment

I was agreeing with you btw


396 posted on 04/28/2009 9:40:45 AM PDT by djsherin (Government is essentially the negation of liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: djsherin
Secession is not denied to the states...

No, but the power to admit states and approve changes in their status once they've been allowed to join are powers reserved to Congress. Implied in that it the power to approve leaving as well.

397 posted on 04/28/2009 9:45:44 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 395 | View Replies]

To: djsherin
Nullification before secession is a wonderful principle

Nullification is not constitutional.

398 posted on 04/28/2009 9:47:03 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 394 | View Replies]

To: awake-n-angry

***Can half of a state decide to secede from a state?***

Irrelevant to the conversation, but if the state wants to split itself in half, why not? It has to be the state’s decision though. Besides, you’re comparing apples to oranges. One arbitrary part of a state wanting to secede from another is different than a sovereign state seceding from a union it created. The state preceded the union. The arbitrary part of the hypothetical state wanting to secede did not precede the state.

***an a state decide to secede and decide that they would like to be annexed by another nation***

Yes.

***can South Florida decide that they would like to seced from Florida and the US and decide to become a part of Cuba.***

You essentially asked this same thing when you asked if half a state could secede from the other half.

***Can a foreeable Latin majority in Mexico decide to hold a vote and decide that Texas is now a state of Mexico?***

No. That’s for the state of Texas to decide.

***Can Saudi Arabia annex Detroit’s large muslim population if they hold a vote and agree to it?***

No. Again that’s for the state to decide.


399 posted on 04/28/2009 9:48:40 AM PDT by djsherin (Government is essentially the negation of liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 378 | View Replies]

To: MamaTexan

This thread isn’t dead yet :)


400 posted on 04/28/2009 9:50:24 AM PDT by djsherin (Government is essentially the negation of liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 396 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 361-380381-400401-420 ... 461-464 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson