Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Senate Proposal Could Put Heavy Restrictions on Internet Freedoms
FoxNews ^ | Tuesday, April 21, 2009 | James Osborne

Posted on 04/21/2009 1:16:43 PM PDT by Joiseydude

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last
To: 50sDad

Because to s self-hating anti American “progressive”, every foreign terrorist is a misunderstood friend, while his conservative neighbor is worse than Satan himself.


21 posted on 04/21/2009 1:28:04 PM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: manc
54% of people voted for this. I don't think it can be saved. Better to let it all collapse... while watching from a safe distance.

Enough is enough.

We are not here to subsidize your clueless business plans or reward your failures.


22 posted on 04/21/2009 1:28:11 PM PDT by Spktyr (Overwhelmingly superior firepower and the willingness to use it is the only proven peace solution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude
A bill making its way through Congress proposes to give the U.S. government authority over all networks considered part of the nation's critical infrastructure. Under the proposed Cybersecurity Act of 2009, the president would have the authority to shut down Internet traffic to protect national security.

How is my access to YouTube, Amazon, and FR a "threat to national security?"

A "threat to national security" would be if they hacked into a Pentagon database, or a Congressionial network, or the hard drives at Los Alamos labs, but I doubt that those are available from the internet.

And when did the internet become part of "the nation's critical infrastructure?"

All it will take is one internal CIA-led "attack" to give Obama the reason to shut down the internet. I'd be surprised if something as little as a FReep of a CNN online poll would be enough to call it an attack, if there was some viral news or video making the rounds that Obama wanted stopped.

-PJ

23 posted on 04/21/2009 1:28:36 PM PDT by Political Junkie Too (This just in... Voting Republican is a Terrorist act!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: briarbey b

Seriously, a pigeon could carry quite a lot of data on a memory stick.

But... time to get into long-range Bluetooth and packet transmission by radio.


24 posted on 04/21/2009 1:31:22 PM PDT by coydog (Proud to have slept through the Obama coronation!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

I notice that when something is bad, the press inserts the generic “government” or “president” words in place of Obama.


25 posted on 04/21/2009 1:31:35 PM PDT by Luke21
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

Folks this is just the beginning. They want to take our freedoms away as we know them. All this in the first 3 months. It is going to be a long 45 months.


26 posted on 04/21/2009 1:31:45 PM PDT by Uncle Hal
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude

And Olympia Snowe is one of the co-sponsors of the bill! THROW HER OUT OF THE PARTY NOW!!!!!!!


27 posted on 04/21/2009 1:33:09 PM PDT by wk4bush2004 (PALIN-BACHMANN, 2012......."GIVE ESTROGEN A CHANCE!!!!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: freedumb2003
Of course. According to the McCain Deranged there was no difference whatsoever between the two candidates or their parties. Voting for a third party or sitting out the election was a patriotic act doncha’ know?
28 posted on 04/21/2009 1:34:43 PM PDT by Jacquerie (The failures of Central Planning cannot be corrected with more Central Planning.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude

The ‘black market’ net will be along shortly...


29 posted on 04/21/2009 1:35:01 PM PDT by ovrtaxt (We are not to expect to be translated from despotism to liberty in a feather bed. -Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude

The DUmmies are under the illusion that the Left represents freedom and freedom from government.

Wonder how they are viewing this?


30 posted on 04/21/2009 1:35:16 PM PDT by VeniVidiVici (Sprechen sie Austrian?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ShadowAce; bamahead

.


31 posted on 04/21/2009 1:35:54 PM PDT by KoRn (Department of Homeland Security, Certified - "Right Wing Extremist")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: skeeter

The Critters (Rockefeller, Olympia Snowe, Bill Nelson (who I do not know) :

The bill would allow the government to create a detailed set of standards for cybersecurity, as well as take over the process of certifying IT technicians. But many in the technology sector say the government is simply ill-equipped to get involved at the technical level, said Franck Journoud, a policy analyst with the Business Software Alliance.

“Simply put, who has the expertise?” he said. “It’s the industry, not the government. We have a responsibility to increase and improve security. That responsibility cannot be captured in a government standard.”

A spokeswoman from Rockefeller’s office said neither he nor the two senators who co-sponsored the bill, Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, and Bill Nelson, D-Fla., will answer questions on cybersecurity at a later date.


32 posted on 04/21/2009 1:36:05 PM PDT by Texas Fossil (The last time I looked, this is still Texas where I live.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude

Zeig heil! Mein Furher est Obama


33 posted on 04/21/2009 1:37:16 PM PDT by the long march
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rdb3; Calvinist_Dark_Lord; GodGunsandGuts; CyberCowboy777; Salo; Bobsat; JosephW; ...

34 posted on 04/21/2009 1:38:03 PM PDT by ShadowAce (Linux -- The Ultimate Windows Service Pack)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude
There is only one way to stop this communist King Obama. Impeach him.
35 posted on 04/21/2009 1:38:29 PM PDT by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: VeniVidiVici

Leftists always make excuses for the totalitarian moves of their leftist leadership. They believe in the “solution” that the leadership is working towards is achievable and without negative tradeoffs. They are willing to put up with a lot of bad stuff in order to achieve that utopian solution.


36 posted on 04/21/2009 1:39:50 PM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, Bowman later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Logical me

That’s not the only way.

Tenth amendment sovereignty would stop him.
Secession would stop him.


37 posted on 04/21/2009 1:40:38 PM PDT by MrB (Go Galt now, Bowman later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Hal
They want to take our freedoms away as we know them. All this in the first 3 months. It is going to be a long 45 months.

There will nothing left in 45 months. The move to King Obama and his thugs will have been complete before that.

38 posted on 04/21/2009 1:42:50 PM PDT by Logical me (Oh, well!!!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Joiseydude

There’s a real threat in the foreseeable future of massively destructive cyberwar. We do need some mechanism for the Commander-in-Chief to take emergency action, but we also need a strong mechanism to protect against abuse of that power. I’d propose requiring a majority vote of Supreme Court justices, with any or all of the evidence presented to them remaining confidential if a majority of them agree it needs to be for national security reasons, but with their individual votes being made public.

There’s no perfect solution, but at least the SC justices aren’t campaigning for office or in position to vote to bestow vast sums of taxpayer money on their cronies and campaign donors. And they are a small group, old enough to have perspective, and few enough to have a sense of collegiality. In a major emergency such as a serious cyberattack, I’d really prefer to have a Commander-in-Chief consulting with the 9 SC justices to get permission to shut down the Internet, than with the unruly mob of Congresspeople and Senators.


39 posted on 04/21/2009 1:43:10 PM PDT by GovernmentShrinker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lucky9teen
This and no other is the root from which a tyrant springs; when he first appears he is a protector. - Plato
40 posted on 04/21/2009 1:43:55 PM PDT by La Lydia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-83 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson