Skip to comments.
A Lawyer, Some Teens and a Fight Over 'Sexting'
Wall Street Journal ^
| 4/21/09
| Dionne Searcey
Posted on 04/21/2009 12:24:19 PM PDT by steve-b
The group of anxious parents crowded around District Attorney George Skumanick Jr. as he sat behind a table in a courtroom here and presented them with an ultimatum.
Photos of their semi-nude or scantily clad teenage daughters were stacked before him. Mr. Skumanick said the images had been discovered on cellphones confiscated at the local high school. They could either enlist their kids in an education program or have the teens face felony charges of child pornography. "We could have just arrested them but we didn't," said Mr. Skumanick in an interview....
But some legal experts say that here in Wyoming County, Pa., Mr. Skumanick has expanded the definition of sexting to such an extent he could be setting a dangerous precedent. He has threatened to charge kids who appeared in photos, but who didn't send them, as well as at least one girl who was photographed wearing a bathing suit. One of the accused is 11 years old.
"The whole tawdry episode seems to call for a little parental guidance and a pop-gun approach, not a Howitzer approach with a felony prosecution," said Louis Natali, a law professor at Temple University....
(Excerpt) Read more at online.wsj.com ...
TOPICS: Crime/Corruption; Government; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: abuse; bigbrother
The sort of gathering that
SHOULD be "crowded around District Attorney George Skumanick Jr."
1
posted on
04/21/2009 12:24:19 PM PDT
by
steve-b
To: steve-b
Hey remember that time parents used to handle this kind of stuff?
2
posted on
04/21/2009 12:30:10 PM PDT
by
exist
To: steve-b
Does this guy want to spank these girls?
3
posted on
04/21/2009 12:31:05 PM PDT
by
Raycpa
To: steve-b
...the 17-year-old worried they could see her photo and recalls she said, “I think the worst punishment is knowing that all you old guys saw me naked. I just think you guys are all just perverts.”
4
posted on
04/21/2009 12:35:28 PM PDT
by
Raycpa
To: steve-b
I think the guy did the right thing, there are many parents unaware of what kids can do on the internet, or at least unaware how to stop it.
If I had an 11 year-old daughter whose photo in a bathing suit was being distributed around to creeps I’d like a heads up, and that’s what he gave them.
5
posted on
04/21/2009 12:38:08 PM PDT
by
Gothmog
(I fight for Xev)
To: Raycpa
Skumaniac was pissed that he didnt get all the pics to drool over.
6
posted on
04/21/2009 12:38:14 PM PDT
by
Concho
(01-20-2009--The beginning of an ERROR)
To: Raycpa
She was seen and judged inadequate
7
posted on
04/21/2009 12:39:27 PM PDT
by
bert
(K.E. N.P. +12 . Crucify ! Crucify ! Crucify him!!)
To: steve-b
Before showing the photos, Mr. Skumanick explained his offer to the crowd, answering one father's question affirmatively, that -- yes -- a girl in a bathing suit could be subjected to criminal charges because she was posed "provocatively." Mr. Skumanick would fit right in with the Iranian Mullahs.
8
posted on
04/21/2009 12:40:16 PM PDT
by
6SJ7
(atlasShruggedInd: ON)
To: Gothmog
They could either enlist their kids in an education program or have the teens face felony charges of child pornography. i.e. You can choose between Re-Education and being classified as an Enemy Of The People.
9
posted on
04/21/2009 12:48:47 PM PDT
by
steve-b
(Intelligent design is to evolutionary biology what socialism is to free-market economics.)
To: steve-b
Last month, the American Civil Liberties Union and a group of parents sued Mr. Skumanick in federal court in Scranton, Pa., alleging he violated the freedom-of-expression rights of three teenage girls. The ACLU also says that Mr. Skumanick is interfering with their parents' rights to raise them as they see fit.
To: Snickering Hound
I can't believe this moron prosecutor did something so dumb I now find myself in agreement with the ACLU.
11
posted on
04/21/2009 12:54:26 PM PDT
by
colorado tanker
(Mr. Pirate? Candygram (courtesy of the U.S. Navy)!)
To: colorado tanker
They actually are on the right position at times....very rarely, but at times they are correct.
12
posted on
04/21/2009 1:09:09 PM PDT
by
rwfromkansas
("Carve your name on hearts, not marble." - C.H. Spurgeon)
To: colorado tanker
A friend of mine recently busted her son (14) doing this, 3 weeks later her sister busted her son (15) with some pics from a girl. It is apparently very common now, why am I not surprised. Kids can text anything they want to, and they want to. Prosecuting this is beyond stupid. The boys I know lost their phones and got restricted for a while, seems appropriate.
13
posted on
04/21/2009 1:13:17 PM PDT
by
east1234
(It's the borders stupid! My new enviromentalist inspired tagline: cut, kill, dig and drill)
To: steve-b
He has threatened to charge kids who appeared in photos, but who didn't send them, as well as at least one girl who was photographed wearing a bathing suit My God!
The little harlot was wearing a bathing suit?
Stone her! Burn her!
To the stake with ye, harlot!!!
14
posted on
04/21/2009 1:17:52 PM PDT
by
humblegunner
(Where my PIE at, fool?)
To: east1234
In the bad old days when I grew up the teacher or cop who found this would call the parent involved and the problem would be taken care of, most definitely.
And stuff like this did go on, in games of "doctor" and spin the bottle. It's just it couldn't be recorded on a cell phone so some power freak prosecutor could get involved.
15
posted on
04/21/2009 1:18:23 PM PDT
by
colorado tanker
(Mr. Pirate? Candygram (courtesy of the U.S. Navy)!)
To: Raycpa
...the 17-year-old worried they could see her photo and recalls she said, I think the worst punishment is knowing that all you old guys saw me naked. I just think you guys are all just perverts.
Well honey, eventually your picture will end being distributed to perverts to wank off to, which feeds their appetite for more. Someplace, somewhere a little girl is being exploited and abused to feed that same appetite and you, you stupid 17 year old skank are now a part of that cycle of abuse. Way to go.
16
posted on
04/21/2009 1:55:47 PM PDT
by
Valpal1
(Always be prepared to make that difference.)
To: Raycpa
Chickie didn’t understand that once the picture was in electronic format, it essentially was on the web for all to see anyway...
17
posted on
04/21/2009 1:56:56 PM PDT
by
MrB
(Go Galt now, Bowman later)
To: colorado tanker
In the bad old days when I grew up the teacher or cop who found this would call the parent involved and the problem would be taken care of, most definitely.Agreed. My parents would have let me know this was not countenanced in a way I wouldn't forget for a while.
Problem is that parents can't discipline their children in this enlightened age.
18
posted on
04/21/2009 4:30:14 PM PDT
by
Ole Okie
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson