Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 04/05/2009 12:20:48 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last
To: BuckeyeTexan; Swordmaker

Ping to Swordmaker. IIRC, you are a student of the shroud?


2 posted on 04/05/2009 12:24:12 PM PDT by Richard Kimball (We're all criminals. They just haven't figured out what some of us have done yet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: SunkenCiv

Ping


3 posted on 04/05/2009 12:24:32 PM PDT by BuckeyeTexan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Bump...


4 posted on 04/05/2009 12:28:27 PM PDT by tubebender
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

of course carbon-dating is more conclusive then actual documentation...


5 posted on 04/05/2009 12:29:14 PM PDT by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Old Sarge

Knights Templar PING!


6 posted on 04/05/2009 12:32:55 PM PDT by MS.BEHAVIN (Women who behave rarely make history)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
I do believe that a “Papal Apology” is in order.

The King of France trumped up charges against the Knights Templar, to get out of his debts.

That some “sins” were discovered among the Knights? Really? Who would NOT “admit” to sinful behavior during torture?

The Pope was NOT in charge of arresting the Templar Knights, and the Pope, at the time, did not find that the Knights were guilty of heresy.

Still, they way they were treated was just wrong, and the Church, at the time, should have done more.

“Friday the 13th” is the day the Templars were first arrested, by the King of France.

7 posted on 04/05/2009 12:34:33 PM PDT by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

It was my understanding that the Knights Templar were the keepers of the Holy Grail.


9 posted on 04/05/2009 12:36:03 PM PDT by CapnJack
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: uglybiker

Demolet does it again.


11 posted on 04/05/2009 12:36:41 PM PDT by patton (I hope that they fight to the death and both sides win.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: uglybiker

ping


12 posted on 04/05/2009 12:38:21 PM PDT by Delta 21 (If you cant tell if I'm being sarcastic...maybe I'm not.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Funny, he doesn't look Jewish.

13 posted on 04/05/2009 12:38:57 PM PDT by BroJoeK (a little historical perspective...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
Myself having a packrat mentality, I can't imagine anyone throwing away or deliberately destroying the Shroud. But there are plenty of non believers who would do it.
15 posted on 04/05/2009 12:39:33 PM PDT by Ditter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Where was the shroud from 1-1204?


17 posted on 04/05/2009 12:41:26 PM PDT by nufsed (Release the birth certificate, passport and school records.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Alamo-Girl; albee; AnalogReigns; AnAmericanMother; Angelas; AniGrrl; annalex; annyokie; ...
Shroud of Turin WAS held by the Knights Templar after the Fourth Crusade according to documentation found in the Vatican Archives ... PING!

If you want on or off the Shroud of Turin Ping List, Freepmail me.


34 posted on 04/05/2009 1:04:14 PM PDT by Swordmaker (Remember, the proper pronunciation of IE is "AAAAIIIIIEEEEEEE!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Discovery Channel or History Channel did a special a few years back on the Shroud of Turin. Apparently, for political reasons and fear of power of the Knights Templar brought their downfall by the King & the Pope. And yes, the carbon dating of the Shroud indicated that it was of later date, and therefore a fake. The sample taken was just a few threads from a corner. I seriously doubt that any samples will ever be taken again. And the story will grow.


35 posted on 04/05/2009 1:08:53 PM PDT by lilylangtree (Veni, Vidi, Vici)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

Like everything else worth saving in this world, it’ll wind up in the filthy hands of the islamists, eventually.


41 posted on 04/05/2009 1:13:23 PM PDT by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (American Revolution II -- overdue.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
Horsehockeys.
43 posted on 04/05/2009 1:16:48 PM PDT by mad_as_he$$ (Nemo me impune lacessit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
from shroudstory.com

It is well established that a cloth with a purported image of Jesus existed in Edessa (now Urfa, Turkey) prior to 5th century CE. This was documented by Eusebius of Caesarea in the early 4th century. According to Eusebius (and this part of the record should be treated as legend for it has many such qualities) the cloth was brought to Edessa by the apostle Thomas or the disciple Thadeus (of the biblical 70).

What is reliable history is that in 544, a cloth with an image thought to be of Jesus was found concealed above a gate in the city walls of Edessa. That cloth was transferred to Constantinople on August 14, 944. At that time, it was described by Gregory Referendarius as a full-length burial cloth with an image of Jesus (purportedly) and bloodstains in the vicinity of a side wound.

Following the sacking of Constantinople in 1204, that cloth became the property of Othon de la Roche, the French Lord of Athens and Thebes (Athens was in French hands). He sent it to his castle home in the town of Besançon, France, likely in 1207. At Eastertide, it was removed from castle and displayed in the Besançon Cathedral. We don’t know when that practice started but it ended when the cathedral was destroyed by fire in March of 1349.

Any records that might have existed may have been burned in that fire as all church records were destroyed. In that same year, Geoffroy de Charny, a French knight married Jeanne de Vergy, a grand-niece of Othon de la Roche, and delivered the shroud (or a shroud) to the canons of Lirey, thereby creating the earliest extant record in Western Europe.

57 posted on 04/05/2009 1:31:36 PM PDT by agere_contra (So ... where's the birth certificate?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan

More support for the Shroud = the Mandylion. It will take more positive evidence overturning the carbon dating, beyond the plausible theories proposed to explain that to quiet many of the skeptics.. However, it will never be 100% proven by the dictates of science; God wants this belief to be by faith and that requires it to be beyond scientific proof.


59 posted on 04/05/2009 1:37:28 PM PDT by JohnBovenmyer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Salvation; narses; SMEDLEYBUTLER; redhead; Notwithstanding; nickcarraway; Romulus; ...
Catholic Ping List
Please freepmail me if you want on/off this list


62 posted on 04/05/2009 1:40:52 PM PDT by NYer ("Run from places of sin as from a plague." - St. John Climacus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: BuckeyeTexan
2nd time in a number of years the Vatican has corrected some of the historical details of the Templar. The question is why, and why now? Are they laying the ground work for their return given their “challenges” in Europe?
86 posted on 04/05/2009 2:40:29 PM PDT by taildragger (Palin / Mulally 2012)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-26 next last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson