Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ed Rendell/Bob Casey try to get Specter to switch sides
Allentown Morning Call ^

Posted on 03/16/2009 11:39:42 AM PDT by haff99

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last
To: upsdriver

>>>>What a great idea!! Specter could become a Republican!

LOLOLLLLLL


41 posted on 03/16/2009 1:19:10 PM PDT by Taffini ( Mr. Pippen and Mr. Waffles do not approve)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Political Junkie Too

I believe he was a democrat until around ‘64. Changed to Republican so he could get voted into some office. And,, as he has everything a$$ backwards, he’s a nacilbupeR!


42 posted on 03/16/2009 1:31:54 PM PDT by Dr. Bogus Pachysandra ( Ya can't pick up a turd by the clean end!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: haff99
Ed Rendell/Bob Casey try to get Specter to switch sides

They're trying to get him to vote Republican?

43 posted on 03/16/2009 1:37:30 PM PDT by Iron Munro (Suppose you were an idiot. And suppose you were a member of Congress. But I repeat myself.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj; AuH2ORepublican; Impy; Norman Bates; ExTexasRedhead; justiceseeker93; neverdem; ...

I am willing to forgive the Spectre for a lot, as I appreciate his support for Clarence Thomas (did more than anyone else to get Thomas confirmed) and Bush’s judicial picks. But this is going too far. And with his age and health history, he has no business running for yet another term.


44 posted on 03/16/2009 3:52:26 PM PDT by Clintonfatigued (Being condemned for corruption by Mexico is like being lectured on morals by the adult film industy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued; fieldmarshaldj; Impy; Clemenza

When a RINO Senator is contemplating switching parties, I usually say “good riddance to bad rubbish,” especially since it likely wouldn’t reduce the number of Republicans in each Senate committee and sub-committee and would allow the GOP to name a replacement Republican in each of the committees and sub-committees on which Specter sits (thus making each committee and sub-committee a bit less liberal). However, if Specter switches and becomes a 100% liberal instead of a 70% liberal he may provide the 60th vote for cloture on all sorts of harmful bills, so we need to tread carefully here. Still, I can’t imagine that Specter running as a Democrat would be a stronger Democrat Senate candidate in 2010 than, say, Congressman Tim Holden or (obviously) Gov. Ed Rendell, so at the very least I hope that Specter switches to the Democrats prior to a tough Democrat candidate jumping into the race.


45 posted on 03/16/2009 4:48:49 PM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (Fred Thompson appears human-sized because he is actually standing a million miles away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: Clintonfatigued; AuH2ORepublican; fieldmarshaldj

The AFL-CIO is also courting to switch or at least vote for card check.

The mere fact he would even think about should give pause to any elected Republican thinking about backing him in a GOP primary.

It should have given GOP voters pause about McLame too, he was almost Kerry’s running mate.


46 posted on 03/16/2009 5:00:34 PM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

They already have 60 cloture votes including the Maine Twins. Those two could easily switch parties as well were it not for the fact they wouldn’t be embraced by ME Democrats, who are so moonbat as to make the two of them look like Jesse Helms types.


47 posted on 03/16/2009 6:07:57 PM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; george76; ...
Note: this topic is from March 16.
Rendell indicated Democrats would clear the field for him. "He'd be unopposed," Rendell said. "The Democrats in the Senate would welcome him. We in Pennsylvania would welcome him. I think he'd be basically unopposed for the Democratic nomination and I think he'd win 60-65 percent of the vote in the general election."

48 posted on 04/28/2009 12:36:24 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv
But will the unions get in line to support Spector? Hard to win a ‘Rat primary in PA without them - and Spector might have to do a flip-flop on “card check”.
49 posted on 04/28/2009 1:16:35 PM PDT by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 48 | View Replies]

To: justiceseeker93

He’s managed to win plenty of elections, and despite his health and age (he isn’t likely to finish the next term, regardless, IMHO) I don’t think it’s wise to count him out quite yet. If he doesn’t want to flip on card check, he can just change the subject regarding the carbon tax...

oh wait...

He supports that too, in coal country.


50 posted on 04/28/2009 4:18:30 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-50 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson