Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Conservative Peg Luksik to challenge Arlen Specter
AP ^ | March 10, 2009

Posted on 03/10/2009 9:39:55 AM PDT by maggief

HARRISBURG, Pa. (AP) — A conservative activist who ran for Pennsylvania governor three times in the 1990s says she will challenge Arlen Specter for the Republican nomination for U.S. Senate next year.

Peg Luksik, of Johnstown, said Tuesday she is not deterred by the prospective candidacy of former congressman Pat Toomey. Toomey, a fellow conservative who narrowly lost to Specter in the 2004 primary, says he is considering running in 2010.

Luksik says Toomey told her last month that he wouldn't challenge Specter. She says it's up to Toomey to decide whether he wants to risk dividing the GOP's conservative wing and allowing Specter to win a sixth term.

(Excerpt) Read more at google.com ...


TOPICS: Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Pennsylvania
KEYWORDS: luksik; pa2010; pennarino; senatorsphincter; snarlinarlen; specter; spectertruthfile; toomey
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-135 next last
To: old and tired
"I still maintain though that Toomey can't run because his financial backers are hurting in this economy. "

? Who's not hurting.

61 posted on 03/10/2009 11:08:03 AM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

“If what she says is true the way I read it, Toomey is in Specter’s corner and will only run to keep her from getting in.”


I can’t believe that Luksik really believes that; if she does, she must have quite a tinfoil-hat collection. Pat Toomey is as far from being in Specter’s corner as one can be.

Toomey will announce in the next week or so that he’s running against Specter. Luksik would have no chance against Toomey, and her presence on the ballot could only throw the nomination to Specter by splitting the conservative vote. Luksik should seek a different office.


62 posted on 03/10/2009 11:13:58 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (Fred Thompson appears human-sized because he is actually standing a million miles away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: Impy
? Who's not hurting

Arlen Specter.

63 posted on 03/10/2009 11:14:21 AM PDT by old and tired
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican
Sorry I misread the orginal post.

I thought it said that Toomy was NOT running.

Mea Culpachino

64 posted on 03/10/2009 11:17:50 AM PDT by Syncro (NerObama Parties Hardy And fiddles While The American Economy Burns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

“Are you still living in Tennessee, or is your homepage flag for some other purpose?”

Don’t start with that weak crap. Everybody here has a right to an opinion on EVERY race.

Luksik is weaker than Toomey period, and this not a last minute entry on his part, the freaking primary is over a year away. Sure should run against black jack Murtha.


65 posted on 03/10/2009 11:18:43 AM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: old and tired

He’s made no moves to run for any office. Perhaps burned out after 2006.


66 posted on 03/10/2009 11:19:55 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: pissant

I presume he’s opposed (but he didn’t cast a vote for or against since he left Congress in 2005). If he isn’t, I concur with your last sentence.


67 posted on 03/10/2009 11:22:14 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 54 | View Replies]

To: old and tired

He’s hurting from cancer.


68 posted on 03/10/2009 11:25:41 AM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: fatima

Toomey is Roman Catholic, and saw the light on abortion about 10 years ago (after the birth of his daughter), and from then onwards he had a perfect 100% pro-life voting record in Congress according to NRTLC. See http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_qa3827/is_200302/ai_n9207545


69 posted on 03/10/2009 11:27:45 AM PDT by AuH2ORepublican (Fred Thompson appears human-sized because he is actually standing a million miles away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj

The reason I asked is it seems to me the Club for Growth used to be an illegal alien cheerleading organization.


70 posted on 03/10/2009 11:29:23 AM PDT by pissant (THE Conservative party: www.falconparty.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing
"Are you still living in Tennessee, or is your homepage flag for some other purpose?"

I've always lived in TN.

"In any event, I do find Toomey's apparent decision unfortunate. Conervatives in PA would be better served by not having two of their standard bearers butting heads in a primary."

I find his entry a decided relief. Luksik is practically a perennial also-ran. That's not the best we can put up. If Toomey decided not to get in, it might be a different story, but you and I both know Luksik isn't going to win a Senate race in a general election match-up unless the Democrat was a convicted felon or child molestor.

"Toomey knows Luksik has already all but officially announced her campaign. His decision, if true, is counterproductive and appears opportunistic. Pat Toomey is better than that, IMO."

We've been stomping from the rafters since 2004 for Toomey to seek a rematch. It was his honor to do so. Why would he defer to a second-tier candidate who cannot win a general election all because they declared "first" ? First doesn't mean best or viable. You know that. If she were viable, it would be a different story.

"Your contention That "For us expecting a solid field assembled this early is a bit ridiculous" makes me wonder who you think "us" is."

Us can be whomever I'm addressing. In this case, Republicans.

"Now is the time to organize the effort and work toward putting a united ticket in place. Now is not the time to be pitting our favorites against each other."

I agree we need to be putting forward our best and most viable candidates, but sometimes that isn't always our personal favorite.

71 posted on 03/10/2009 11:31:40 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies]

To: pissant

It’s a valid question. When he makes his announcement soon, I’m sure he will put out his official position. If he’s a squish or pro-shamnesty, it’s news to me.


72 posted on 03/10/2009 11:33:48 AM PDT by fieldmarshaldj (~"This is what happens when you find a stranger in the Alps !"~~)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies]

To: Impy
Don’t start with that weak crap

No need to get snippy, Impy.

I agree that everyone has a right to an opinion on every race. Everyone also has a right to ask a question.

She should run against black jack Murtha.

Are you saying Bill Russell should drop out?

73 posted on 03/10/2009 11:35:06 AM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 65 | View Replies]

To: AuH2ORepublican

Oh Boy,if Toomey announces next week then Peggy should think about dropping out.


74 posted on 03/10/2009 11:35:50 AM PDT by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: maggief; HonestConservative

Honest Conservative interviewed Peg Luksik on one of her latest shows on BlogTalkRadio. Here is a link for anyone interested. Listen and learn!!

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/stations/HeadingRight/freedom/2009/03/09/TBD


75 posted on 03/10/2009 11:39:46 AM PDT by upsdriver
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: fieldmarshaldj
Well, at this point, I guess we'll just have to wait and see what Toomey says publicly.

but you and I both know Luksik isn't going to win a Senate race in a general election match-up unless the Democrat was a convicted felon or child molestor.

Don't speak for me. I'm not convinced she couldn't win anymore than I'm convinced Toomey could. It's too early to be convinced of anything concerning 2010.

76 posted on 03/10/2009 11:43:59 AM PDT by smoothsailing
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Cyber Liberty

Luksik sounds like a one issue candidate to me. She has NO chance to win.


77 posted on 03/10/2009 11:51:15 AM PDT by Ikemeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: maggief
Is not Pat Toomey also conservative, pro-life, pro-2A? We don't need TWO conservatives splitting the primary in a moderate-to-liberal state.

Or is she actually working for Specter, I wonder?

78 posted on 03/10/2009 11:54:19 AM PDT by Lexinom
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Syncro

There are rumors that Lynn Swann ran for Governor against Rendell, but there is little evidence that it ever happened. It was absolutely the worst campaign I’ve ever witnessed, from start to finish.


79 posted on 03/10/2009 11:57:17 AM PDT by Ikemeister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: smoothsailing

Sorry, I’m testy. I was attacked as a “Yankee!!” from “Obama’s state” by some Louisiana freepers for daring to comment on David Vitter’s electoral weaknesses. I thought you going down that ridiculous avenue, my bad.

Russell is running again? Well he’s lost already and it wasn’t close even after Murtha stuck his foot in his mouth, if there was someone else I’d be inclined to give them a shot.

It’s great Lustik stepped up when it looked like Toomey wasn’t gonna run and I’d like her to run for something. But I don’t care about her and her volunteers feelings, this is about beating Specter and then the rat, Toomey has a a much better chance in November.

AG Corbett is gonna run for Governor as is “moderate” Congressman Gerlach who I wish wouldn’t leave his seat open. Toomey didn’t need to get into that imo.

I’m a little worried about your Governor’s race, it’s switched parties every 8 years for quite some time, that’s bound to end eventually. It would have in 2002 if Schweiker had run.


80 posted on 03/10/2009 11:59:17 AM PDT by Impy (RED=COMMUNIST, NOT REPUBLICAN)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 121-135 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson