Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

That's Sir Edward Kennedy to you; not everyone in Britain is applauding
Los Angeles Times ^ | March 4, 2009 | Johanna Neuman

Posted on 03/04/2009 10:50:56 AM PST by presidio9

Edited on 03/04/2009 11:04:20 AM PST by Admin Moderator. [history]

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last
To: presidio9
If Kennedy accepts he's violating the Constitution:

Article I - Section 9 -

No title of nobility shall be granted by the United States: and no person holding any office of profit or trust under them, shall, without the consent of the Congress, accept of any present, emolument, office, or title, of any kind whatever, from any king, prince, or foreign state.

Of course we all know Dems are famous for trashing the constitution so since when does THAT stop them!?! And don't expect our pravda media to point this out either.

I am just furious - - our entire govt is CORRUPT beyond belief.

21 posted on 03/04/2009 11:09:29 AM PST by conservativegramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Queen Elizabeth has conferred honorary knighthood on Sen. Edward Kennedy, the veteran Massachusetts Democrat who is battling brain cancer.

The Queen of England plans to honor a murderer !

22 posted on 03/04/2009 11:11:36 AM PST by Uri’el-2012 (Psalm 119:174 I long for Your salvation, YHvH, Your law is my delight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: YHAOS

I know someone who is not applauding. Mary Jo.


23 posted on 03/04/2009 11:12:12 AM PST by rjones42
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: misterrob

I would say so, yes.


24 posted on 03/04/2009 11:13:21 AM PST by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: utherdoul
"I wonder what Arthur would have done about knighthoods being tossed around like candy."

I don't know. Maybe that's why a sword was used as the instrument conferring knighthood.

25 posted on 03/04/2009 11:15:45 AM PST by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Unreal. I have over the past couple of days been looking into why the great Patrick Macnee of “The Avengers” has not been knighted (apparently when he became an American citizen, the Crown got a bit ticked off is all I can come up with), and now i read the Queen has knighted a mediocre, besotted U.S. Senator who would never have been elected in the first place but for his last name.

Sheesh.


26 posted on 03/04/2009 11:19:01 AM PST by JennysCool (The Queen can make Ted Kennedy a Knight, but not Patrick Macnee. Strange world.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: rjones42
"I know someone who is not applauding. Mary Jo."

I guess technically we can't say for sure. Mary Jo cannot be contacted for comment. Her family doesn't dare comment.

27 posted on 03/04/2009 11:19:26 AM PST by YHAOS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: conservativegramma; XD45

I am going to say this one time, because I hate when FR looks like it doesn't know what it is talking about. The knighthood is HONORARY, therefore it is not an official title. So the Constitution doesn't care. That's how Rudy Giuliani and Jack Ryan were both able to accept one.

28 posted on 03/04/2009 11:23:40 AM PST by presidio9 (Islam Is As Islam Does)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

And Eisenhower. And George Marshall. And Ronald Reagan. And GHW Bush.

Calm down and let the British papers rake Teddy over the coals—this is their embarassment, not ours.


29 posted on 03/04/2009 11:26:15 AM PST by Philo-Junius (One precedent creates another. They soon accumulate and constitute law.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I agree with you that I hate it when FR doesn’t know what its talking about. This is a PRIME example of that! To claim that an ‘honorary’ title is acceptable under our constitution is complete HORSE CRAP.

All ‘honorary’ means is a slick little legalease dodge that means absolutely NOTHING to get around that pesky constitution thingy so you can trash the constitution and look like you’re upholding it.

I bet my entire life savings that our founders intended Article I Section 9 to INCLUDE HONORARY or anything else titles! They knew what kind of tyranny they had just fought a war over!!!!!!!!!!!! Absolutely sickening.


30 posted on 03/04/2009 11:35:05 AM PST by conservativegramma
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

How is Kerry taking this?


31 posted on 03/04/2009 11:49:11 AM PST by syriacus (Send Obama some BIG towels. He's still wet behind the ears.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

He’s losing his brain and she has lost her mind.


32 posted on 03/04/2009 12:02:22 PM PST by Albion Wilde ("Praise and worship" is my alternate lifestyle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

The Queen would knight a used toilet bowl brush.


33 posted on 03/04/2009 3:16:58 PM PST by TASMANIANRED (TAZ:Untamed, Unpredictable, Uninhibited.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Who next? Sir Charlie Manson or Sir Mumia.


34 posted on 03/04/2009 5:42:18 PM PST by CurlyQ
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-34 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson