Posted on 03/02/2009 11:07:14 AM PST by Calpernia
Attorney General, Eric H. Holder Jr.
U.S. Department of Justice
950 Pennsylvania Avenue, NW
Washington, DC 20530-0001 USA
March 1, 2009
Honorable Attorney General Holder
Re: Request a Special Assistant for the United States to relate Quo Warranto on Barack Hussein Obama, II to Test His Title to President before the Supreme Court
Relators, Major General Carroll Childers, Ret; Lt. Col Dr. David Earl-Graef; Navy and Police officer Mr. Clinton Grimes; Lt. Scott Easterling, currently serving in Iraq; Major James Cannon, US Marine Corps, Ret; New Hampshire State Representative Mr. Timothy Comerford; Tennessee State Representative Mr. Frank Nicely, State of Alabama 2008 electoral college elector Mr. Robert Cusanelli bring information for Quo Warranto on Barack Hussein Obama, II, testing his title to President per attached relation. Relators include:
Robert Cusanelli, Elector for 7th District, State of Alabama, in the 2008 Electoral College;
Frank Nicely, State Representative of Tennessee in his official capacity;
Timothy Comerford, State Representative of New Hampshire in his official capacity;
Major General Carroll Childers, 29th Infantry Div VA retired, lifetime subject to recall; Numerous decorations
1st Lt. Scott R. Easterling OD LG US Army on active duty in Iraq;
Clint Grimes, Sergeant Long Beach Police Officer & CDR/0-5 US Navy (Active Reserve). Numerous decorations, including two National defense medals, two Navy commendation medals
Dr. David Earl-Graef, Lieutenant Colonel Air Force MC, Military Surgeon- Active Reserve. Numerous decorations including Air Force outstanding unit with valor.
James Cannon Major US Marine Corps, Ret, lifetime subject to recall. Numerous awards, including Bronze Star with combat V and two Purple Hearts
Relators oath of office grants standing. Relators are affected by actions of Respondent Obama and the outcome of this Quo Warranto, and thus have interest above citizens.
Information on Quo Warranto against a Federal Officer is normally related to the Attorney General to raise on behalf of the United States in U.S. District court of the District of Columbia per DC Code 16-3502. However, the Attorney General defends the office of President and is appointed by the President. For the Attorney General to bring Quo Warranto on the President raises an intrinsic conflict of interest. USAM 3-2.170 Historically, a Special Prosecutor or Independent Counsel was appointed to eliminate such conflicts of interest, e.g., Attorney General Elliot Richardson appointed Archibald Cox as the Watergate Special Prosecutor over issues touching on President Nixon.
This information on Quo Warranto includes action between the United States ex rel. and the State of Hawaii over original birth records of Barack H. Obama II being withheld per Hawaiis privacy laws. Hawaiis action obstructs the constitutional duties of election officers to validate or evaluate President Election Obama qualifications to become President under U.S. CONST. art II - 1 and Amend. XX 3.
As President Elect, Respondent Obama failed to submit prima facie evidence of his qualifications before January 20, 2009. Election officers failed to challenge, validate or evaluate his qualifications. Relators submit that as President Elect, Respondent Obama failed qualify per U.S. CONST. Amend. XX 3.
Such negligence and misprision threaten to nullify these essential safeguards. Thus Relators request this Quo Warranto be related to the Supreme Court under its original jurisdiction.
Enclosed is a summary motion for leave to file Quo Warranto on Barack Hussein Obama II aka Barry Soetoro, with the Supreme Court. The list of Questions Presented is attached. A full brief supporting this motion is in preparation.
1) Relators respectfully pray that the Attorney General recuse himself over bringing this Quo Warranto for the United States on Barack H. Obama II, by reason of intrinsic conflict of interest.
2) Relators pray the Attorney General appoint a Special Assistant (prosecutor) of Archibald Coxs reputation and expertise, to relate this Quo Warranto to the Supreme Court per 28 USC 543.
3) Relators request that their attorney, Orly Taitz, ESQ DDS, assist in relating this Quo Warranto, being recognized at bar before the Supreme Court.
4) Relators further request the assistance of Patrick Fitzgerald, United States Attorney General for the Northern District of Illinois, as having familiarity with issues involving Barack H. Obama II while Senator from Illinois and as President Elect.
5) Relators request guidance from the Attorney General, within one week of receipt of this information, regarding his decision on whether to appoint such a Special Assistant.
With respect, in absence of such guidance, Relators will proceed to request leave from the Supreme Court to relate information for this Quo Warranto on Mr. Obama to test his title.
Yours Sincerely,
Orly Taitz, ESQ
Attorney for Relators
Encl. Motion to Supreme Court for leave to relate Quo Warranto on Barack Hussein Obama II, testing his title to the Federal office of President.
ping
Soldiers serving in active war zones have a right to know if Obama is a legitimate president
All citizens of the USA do.
BTTT
Asking the Atty General to proceed against his own boss seems like a losing battle to me, but I hope Orly gets somewhere with it. Thanks for the ping.
I didn’t give this campaign much credence in the beginning,although the thought of his ineligibility to be president was kinda interesting,I didn’t think it would catch on.It may actually go someplace now!
Not according to all judgements to date regarding this matter, in which the SC has decided that any US citizen (to date) has no standing to bring a case.
I wonder how he manages to get a passport.
Thank you for keeping the rest of us abreast of developments in this case, Cal.
My sincerest gratitude is extended to Dr. Taitz and all those who have joined her legal battle to uphold our Constitution.
I have expressed my dissatisfaction with the SC on this issue already. They’ve dropped the ball.
bump
Orly has cases with standing.
bump
As Commissioned Officers holding an Office which requires them, under oath, to uphold and defend the Constitution and subject to execute military orders given by the Commander in Chief, could put a little different spin on the complaint. Could get interesting.
bump, bump!
Thanks for keeping us up to date with this, Calpernia.
She does? Who?
I mean, I realize that as a taxpaying US citizen I am an unsophisticated slave, an cruel enemy of the “new common man”, and a callous lout who is a fool for questioning the almighty wisdom of the federal government; at least, that’s the way it is when it comes to questioning the legitimacy of someone who has two hundred lawyers to guard against him ever having to produce a $15 document. I just wonder how any taxpaying US citizen could ever be granted standing.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.