Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Eleven States Declare Sovereignty Over Obama’s Action
Human Events ^ | 02/23/2009 | A.W.R. Hawkins

Posted on 02/23/2009 6:56:46 PM PST by CARepublicans

Eleven States Declare Sovereignty Over Obama’s Action by A.W.R. Hawkins

02/23/2009

State governors -- looking down the gun barrel of long-term spending forced on them by the Obama “stimulus” plan -- are saying they will refuse to take the money. This is a Constitutional confrontation between the federal government and the states unlike any in our time.

In the first five weeks of his presidency, Barack Obama has acted so rashly that at least 11 states have decided that his brand of “hope” equates to an intolerable expansion of the federal government’s authority over the states. These states -- Washington, New Hampshire, Arizona, Montana, Michigan, Missouri, Oklahoma, California, Georgia, South Carolina, and Texas -- have passed resolutions reminding Obama that the 10th Amendment protects the rights of the states, which are the rights of the people, by limiting the power of the federal government. These resolutions call on Obama to “cease and desist” from his reckless government expansion and also indicate that federal laws and regulations implemented in violation of the 10th Amendment can be nullified by the states.

When the Constitution was being ratified during the 1780s, the 10th Amendment was understood to be the linchpin that held the entire Bill of Rights together. The amendment states: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people."

The use of the 10th Amendment in conjunction with nullification garnered much attention in 1828, when the federal government passed a tariff that southerners believed affected them disproportionately. When the 1828 tariff was complemented by another in 1832, Vice President John C. Calhoun resigned the Vice Presidency to lead his home state of South Carolina in pursuit of an “ordinance of nullification,” which was no less a declaration of the sovereignty of each individual state within the union than the declarations now being made.

Calhoun was simply exercising what he recognized to be his state’s right to defend liberty within its borders by rejecting the dictates of an overbearing central government. While his efforts culminated in a tense affair referred to as the “nullification crisis,” which witnessed everything from threats of a federal invasion of South Carolina to an ongoing and near union-rending debate over national power vs. state’s rights, they also succeeded in turning back the tariffs that had been passed in spite of the Constitutional limits on federal power.

This time around, in 2009, appeals to the 10th Amendment are not based on tariffs but on unfettered government expansion in Obama’s “stimulus bill,” federal mandates on abortion that violate state laws, and infringements on the 1st and 2nd Amendments, among other things.

For example, Family Security Matters reports that Missouri’s “House Concurrent Resolution 0004 (2009) reasserts its sovereignty based on Barack Obama’s stated intention to sign into law a federal ‘Freedom of Choice Act’, [because] the federal Freedom of Choice Act would nullify any federal or state law ‘enacted, adopted, or implemented before, on, or after the date of [its] enactment’ and would effectively prevent the State of Missouri from enacting similar protective measures in the future.”

The resolution in Montana grew out of concerns over coming attacks on the 2nd Amendment, thus its preface describes it as, “An Act Exempting From Federal Regulation Under The Commerce Clause Of The Constitution Of The United States A Firearm, A Firearm Accessory, Or Ammunition Manufactured And Retained In Montana.”

New Hampshire’s resolution actually references certain federal actions that would be nullified within that state were they pushed by Obama’s administration, according to americandaily.com. Among these are “Any act regarding religion; further limitations on freedom of political speech; or further limitations on freedom of the press, [and any] further infringements on the right to keep and bear arms including prohibitions of type or quantity of arms or ammunition.

Regardless of the specific reason behind each of the resolutions in the 11 states, all of them direct the federal government to “cease and desist” in its reckless violation of state’s rights. In this way, South Carolina’s resolution is typical of the others issued to date:

“The General Assembly of the State of South Carolina, by this resolution, claims for the State of South Carolina sovereignty under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States over all powers not otherwise enumerated and granted to the federal government by the United States Constitution…

Be it…resolved that this resolution serves as notice and demand to the federal government, as South Carolina's agent, to cease and desist immediately all mandates…beyond the scope of the federal government's constitutionally delegated powers.”

What these state assemblies and congresses have hit upon here is key to our entire conservative interpretation of the Constitution, for these states understand that the Constitution limits the federal government, not the people. Or to put it another way, it guarantees the freedom of the people by limiting the government.

Every conservative should relish the call for the federal government to “cease and desist all mandates that are beyond the scope of [its] constitutionally delegated powers.” In this way, we honor the Constitution that enumerates a number of our liberties yet also guarantees us other liberties that are neither enumerated nor denied in the document.

Liberals don’t respect the Constitution, and liberals in Congress don’t hesitate to propose legislation that would clearly violate it. The current push to give Washington, D.C. a voting representative in the House of Representatives is a good example; even liberal Prof. Jonathan Turley told a Congressional hearing that this bill is patently unconstitutional. But they press on with it.

Our Constitutional system of checks and balances is always thought of as enabling two of the three branches of the federal government to keep the third within its constitutional bounds. But there is a fourth check, the states, which also have a Constitutional function. It is to them this burden now falls. The states can choose between allowing the federal government to impose untenable conditions on them if they accept the stimulus money, or to reject it.

These eleven states have the right to reject the stimulus plan. And they must.

There is no other option. For this federal expansion will not stop unless we stand in its way with courage in our hearts and the Constitution in our hands.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------- HUMAN EVENTS columnist A.W.R. Hawkins has been published on topics including the U.S. Navy, Civil War battles, Vietnam War ideology, the Reagan Presidency, and the Rebirth of Conservatism, 1968-1988. More of his articles can be found at www.awrhawkins.com.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 10thamendment; 111th; agenda; bho2009; bho44; constitution; first100days; obama; obamatruthfile; sovereignty; statesrights; stimulus; teaparty
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last
To: television is just wrong

Even the northeast? I thought the libs had those states locked up tight.


41 posted on 02/23/2009 7:17:59 PM PST by txnativegop (God Bless America! (NRA-Endowment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: boomop1
NC with it's dip shit Governor is in the tank with Obozo.

isn't that the truth we went from crap to the septic tank...I sure do miss Jesse Helms

42 posted on 02/23/2009 7:19:14 PM PST by Gone_Postal ("Men who say it cannot be done, should not interupt those doing it.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: CARepublicans

Hmmm, not bad for just one month Obama. You’ve got just less than 25% of the states, telling you to go F yourself. Imagine what two months will bring.

I’ll bet your accomplishments will be astounding at the one year mark.


43 posted on 02/23/2009 7:21:49 PM PST by DoughtyOne (Resolved: Gregg, McCain, Snowe, Spectre: 2010, Collins, Graham: 2014)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CARepublicans

Okay, but how many in the last 5 weeks?


44 posted on 02/23/2009 7:22:11 PM PST by GrouchoTex (...and ye shall know the Truth and the Truth shall set you free....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CARepublicans
In the first five weeks of his presidency, Barack Obama has acted so rashly that at least 11 states have decided that his brand of “hope” equates to an intolerable expansion of the federal government’s authority over the states. These states -- Washington, New Hampshire, Arizona, Montana, Michigan, Missouri, Oklahoma, California, Georgia, South Carolina, and Texas

WOW! This is obviously not Change these states can believe in!


45 posted on 02/23/2009 7:24:31 PM PST by An American! (Proud To Be An American!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar
Senators Schumer and Gillibrand (Hillary's replacement) from New York also want all of Porkulus that the state could get. We are doomed...
46 posted on 02/23/2009 7:26:38 PM PST by RochesterFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Army Air Corps

While the states assert their sovereignty over all of the “stimulus” issues, they should also assert their sovereignty over their “Electors” and instruct their “Electors” in the next presidential election that no votes may be cast for any Presidential candidate who has not provided a certified copy of his long form birth certificate, sufficient to prove “Natural Born Citizen” status, as required by the Constitution.
States should also assert their sovereignty over their ballots, and pass laws that forbid any name from being listed, on any Presidential ballot, unless “Natural Born Citizen” status has been documented.


47 posted on 02/23/2009 7:28:52 PM PST by Kansas58
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: CARepublicans
Washington, New Hampshire, Arizona, Montana, Michigan, Missouri, Oklahoma, California, Georgia, South Carolina, and Texas

Surprising......Is Jim Clyburn going to accuse all of them of racism?

48 posted on 02/23/2009 7:30:28 PM PST by submarinerswife ("If I win I can't 't be stopped! If I lose I shall be dead." - George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txhurl

The “Solid South” stands up again!

Dang, I’m proud to be a Southerner!

I just wish that Bobby Jindal was my governor.


49 posted on 02/23/2009 7:31:34 PM PST by HotLead61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

Excellent point! That seems like a call they could make without interference from “Uncle Sham” (no, not you, Freeper Sham), but hey, you just never know.


50 posted on 02/23/2009 7:34:57 PM PST by HotLead61
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: txnativegop
"Eleven so far, how many more I wonder?"

I guess that depends on the people in them putting preasure on the greedy crooks that run them.

Lets hope it's at least 30 more.

51 posted on 02/23/2009 7:35:57 PM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Kansas58

I’m with you.


52 posted on 02/23/2009 7:36:24 PM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Nathan Zachary

41 of 50 sounds good to me. Let’s just hope it happens.


53 posted on 02/23/2009 7:37:39 PM PST by txnativegop (God Bless America! (NRA-Endowment))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: CARepublicans

bttt


54 posted on 02/23/2009 7:40:41 PM PST by SuperLuminal (Where is another agitator for republicanism like Sam Adams when we need him?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CARepublicans

Where can I go, what can I do to show my overwhelming support to these 11 states?

I am from Texas so I will absolutely make my voice heard here, but I want to show my support to the governors of the other states...Michigan!!!?? Way to go, Michigan...didnt think you had it in ya...


55 posted on 02/23/2009 7:42:21 PM PST by Former MSM Viewer ("We will hunt the terrorists in every dark corner of the earth. We will be relentless." W 2001)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SpaceBar
Arnold Schwarzenegger said California “will gladly take anything” the other states don’t claim, further reinforcing the notion that he has the intellect of a turnip.

Maybe we should start a movement to send tin cups to the California governor's office(?)

56 posted on 02/23/2009 7:43:36 PM PST by The Duke (I have met the enemy, and he is named 'Apathy'!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: DBrow

“have any gone through the House and Senate and been signed into law by a governor?”

No.


57 posted on 02/23/2009 7:43:48 PM PST by dynachrome (Barack Hussein Obama yunikku khinaaziir)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: gieriscm

ping


58 posted on 02/23/2009 7:43:49 PM PST by BCR #226 (07/02 SOT www.extremefirepower.com...The BS stops when the hammer drops.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: CARepublicans

This is great news...BUT:

Has anyone seen anything on MSM about this yet? I mean more than an insignificant blurb on pg. A-23 in the newspaper?

No one is taking these things seriously — yet. President Obama is likely scoffing at those few states that are rejecting the stimulus. Right now, he’s fine with sending it to other states or tucking it away for another day. And, don’t think those states won’t be “punished” should it come down to other, more “normative” spending programs, etc...

Those who favor State Sovereignty and the restoration of the Constitution had better get organized and loud — VERY LOUD — in short order. Resistnet.com, the “Tea-Party” ideas, becoming a pain in the butt to your Senators and Representatives with cards, emails and calls, demonstrations and protests — and it better be organized and PEACEFUL — but OVERWHELMING.

THey can’t shut-up, jail or kill a couple of million people — but a few thousand are easy to get rid of...They are soon forgotten (Ask Al-Queda, this strategy worked for them on 9/11 — at least among Liberals).


59 posted on 02/23/2009 7:44:22 PM PST by patriot preacher (To be a good American Citizen and a Christian IS NOT a contradiction. (www.mygration.blogspot.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: txnativegop

I won’t hold my breath. But, something has got to happen very soon to stop these corrupt traitors from destroying OUR (the people’s) country.


60 posted on 02/23/2009 7:44:27 PM PST by Nathan Zachary
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 53 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-107 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson