Skip to comments.
Some Find Hope for a Shift in Drug Policy
NYT ^
| February 15, 2009
| WILLIAM YARDLEY
Posted on 02/16/2009 7:45:30 AM PST by SolidWood
SEATTLE Washington State law prohibits the possession of marijuana except for certain medical purposes. Hempfest is not one of them. Yet each summer when the event draws thousands to the Seattle waterfront to call for decriminalizing marijuana, participants light up in clear view of police officers. And they rarely get arrested.
Police officers patrolling are courteous and respectful, said Alison Holcomb, drug policy director for the American Civil Liberties Union of Washington.
One reason for the officers approach, said Ms. Holcomb and others who follow law enforcement in Seattle, is the leadership of R. Gil Kerlikowske, the chief of the Seattle Police Department and, officials in the Obama administration say, the presidents choice to become the head of the Office of National Drug Control Policy, known as the drug czar.
(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...
TOPICS: Culture/Society; Front Page News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: Washington
KEYWORDS: drugs; medicalmarijuana; obama; potheads; warondrugs; wod
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 161 next last
To: DJ MacWoW
This isnt about prohibition. These drugs have not been legal. And its about public safety. Theres enough out there that we dont have to legalize more crap for the dysfunctional.More government lies, eh? Drinking deeply from the spittoon?
What was the active ingredient in "Coca-Cola"? Cocaine. (See: John Stith Pemberton, History of Cocaine, Recreational Use)
What was the purpose of The Marijuana Tax Act of 1937?
A BRIEF HISTORY OF OPIUM
Are there any other stupid assertions you'd like to make?
So, according to you, public safety is tantamount? Therefore we should ban all activity in which someone may hurt themselves or others?
81
posted on
02/16/2009 4:06:30 PM PST
by
Ol' Dan Tucker
(While the truncheon may be used in lieu of conversation, words will always retain their power.)
To: DJ MacWoW
You want to emulate EUROPE?Do you want to emulate the MIDDLE EAST?
82
posted on
02/16/2009 4:08:56 PM PST
by
Ol' Dan Tucker
(While the truncheon may be used in lieu of conversation, words will always retain their power.)
To: DJ MacWoW
Numbers are numbers.
They have roughly half the rate drug use, and yet its largely decriminalized.
Some things european are OK, like Porsche and Mercedes and Bordeaux. This is another.
83
posted on
02/16/2009 4:09:50 PM PST
by
MeanWestTexan
(Beware Obama's Reichstag fire.)
To: MeanWestTexan
Some things european are OK...The Statue of Liberty...
84
posted on
02/16/2009 4:10:37 PM PST
by
Ol' Dan Tucker
(While the truncheon may be used in lieu of conversation, words will always retain their power.)
To: Ol' Dan Tucker
Hedi Klum:
85
posted on
02/16/2009 4:19:32 PM PST
by
MeanWestTexan
(Beware Obama's Reichstag fire.)
To: Ol' Dan Tucker
Le Creuset bakeware
86
posted on
02/16/2009 4:26:16 PM PST
by
MeanWestTexan
(Beware Obama's Reichstag fire.)
To: SmallGovRepub
“You started with the name calling.”
Wrong. You advocate for pot yopu admit to smoking it, that is what you are. Get used to it, you’ve earned the title.
87
posted on
02/16/2009 5:29:34 PM PST
by
narses
(http://www.theobamadisaster.com/)
To: DJ MacWoW
Then we are back to my original post.
There are still murders, should we stop arresting murderers?
People still B&E, should we stop arresting burglars?
There are still assaults, should we stop arresting assaulters?
There is still child abuse, should we stop arresting abusers?
Which brings me back to the original post, which is that the above items are crimes. Smoking pot is a vice.
Vices are not crimes: there is no criminal intent.
To: Ken H
I believe in states rights. I don’t believe that we will EVER get back there.
89
posted on
02/16/2009 6:35:44 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
To: Ol' Dan Tucker
What does what USED to be in Coke have to do with allowing the dysfunctional to have another legal panacea?
More legal mind altering substances is not what people need.
90
posted on
02/16/2009 6:39:30 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
To: Ol' Dan Tucker
That’s pretty funny considering hookah’s are middle eastern.
91
posted on
02/16/2009 6:42:00 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
To: MeanWestTexan
92
posted on
02/16/2009 6:42:29 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
To: microgood
Vices are not crimes: there is no criminal intent. There is when it's illegal. There is when someone uses a mind altering/perception altering drug and drives. Or flies. Or uses heavy equipment. Or teaches your kid. and on and on.....
93
posted on
02/16/2009 6:44:24 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
To: DJ MacWoW
I believe in states rights. I dont believe that we will EVER get back there. Alaska, Oregon and California are either voting or have voted to legalize marijuana. If you believe in states rights, then I would guess you would not have a problem with this? Or do you only believe in states rights when they agree with what you believe?
94
posted on
02/16/2009 6:48:22 PM PST
by
ozarkgirl
(Sarah Palin: pro-life, pro-guns, pro-family, anti-government corruption!)
To: microgood; DJ MacWoW
Which brings me back to the original post, which is that the above items are crimes. Smoking pot is a vice. Yep. What makes the situation even more absurd is that the feds used the Commerce Clause to criminalize this vice, thus trampling the 10th Amendment in the process.
95
posted on
02/16/2009 6:48:39 PM PST
by
Ken H
To: DJ MacWoW
There is when someone uses a mind altering/perception altering drug and drives. Or flies. Or uses heavy equipment. Or teaches your kid. and on and on.....
But the same is true of alcohol, which is a legal vice.
To: ozarkgirl
Or do you only believe in states rights when they agree with what you believe? Do you want an honest discussion or are you looking for a fight?
97
posted on
02/16/2009 6:50:55 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
To: microgood
I stated before that we have enough drunks on the roads. We don’t need to add the drug addicted.
98
posted on
02/16/2009 6:53:56 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
To: Ken H
The feds trample anything that they please. Do you believe that we can actually turn back the clock? I’m not hopeful.
99
posted on
02/16/2009 6:55:02 PM PST
by
DJ MacWoW
(Make yourselves sheep and the wolves will eat you. Ben Franklin)
To: Ken H; DJ MacWoW
Yep. What makes the situation even more absurd is that the feds used the Commerce Clause to criminalize this vice, thus trampling the 10th Amendment in the process.
And the Drug War has turned police into an antagonistic force against us and to the virtual elimination of the 4th Amendment (No knock raids, warrants based on criminal informants, etc).
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 61-80, 81-100, 101-120 ... 161 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson