To: wolfpat
Check this out:
Arizona Sovereignty Resolution The problem with the "court interpretations" of the 14th overriding the 10th are that the (federal) courts have arrogated the right TO supercede the states' sovereignty by ruling in, arguably, their OWN FAVOR. In other words, the courts are not a neutral party in this issue.
The Arizona resolution above clearly states that the fedgov is an agent acting in behalf of the states, not the other way around, as the fedgov is now behaving.
21 posted on
02/16/2009 7:49:17 AM PST by
MrB
(The 0bamanation: Marxism, Infanticide, Appeasement, Depression, Thuggery, and Censorship)
To: MrB
The Arizona resolution above clearly states that the fedgov is an agent acting in behalf of the states, not the other way around, as the fedgov is now behaving.
Wasn't this power assigned to the fed as a result of the failure of the Confederate States to win the War for Southern Independence?
24 posted on
02/16/2009 7:57:59 AM PST by
wolfpat
(Revolt, and re-establish the Constitution as the law of the land!)
To: MrB
Is this the first small step to “Back to the Future?” 1860 comes to mind, I hope not. My grand uncle was in the Confederate Army and was captured at the Battle of Vicksburg. We don’t know what happened to him after that.
33 posted on
02/16/2009 8:09:07 AM PST by
jesseam
(Been there and done that!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson