Posted on 02/11/2009 5:26:59 PM PST by GodGunsGuts
by Tas Walker
The 12th February 2009 marks the 200th anniversary of Charles Darwin’s birth, and evolutionists around the world want us to make it into a big celebration.
Unlike when Christians celebrate the birth of Jesus Christ, most evolutionists are not open and up-front about what they are on about, or how they feel.
They tell us it’s about the impact of Darwin’s great ideas. But when we ask about the way his ideas underpinned the blood-stained policies of Stalin, Mao, Hitler and Pol Pot they change their tune. Richard Dawkins, Darwin’s famous promoter, put it like this, “I’m a passionate Darwinian when it comes to science, when it comes to explaining the world, but I’m a passionate anti-Darwinian when it comes to morality and politics.”1 They want it both ways.
They pretend it is all about science but when do they make a similar fuss over other scientists, such as Newton, Kepler, Pasteur, or Maxwell? It seems that Darwin is an excuse to banish God. As Dawkins said, “ … Darwin made it possible to be an intellectually fulfilled atheist.”2
They pretend it is all about science but when do they make a similar fuss over other scientists, such as Newton, Kepler, Pasteur, or Maxwell?
They pretend that Darwin is about natural selection, but it was a creationist who first came up with the idea. Furthermore, natural selection is a simple part of the biblical Creation/Fall/Flood/Dispersion model, as a culling rather than a creative force.
What they really mean is that bacteria changed into bananas and butchers all by themselves over billions of years. It’s about removing the need for the Creator, but they won’t usually spell that out, or admit that they have no explanation for how it could possibly happen.
They claim Darwin’s idea of evolution was a great intellectual achievement, but don’t explain that the idea destroys reason itself. It certainly worried Darwin, who wrote, “But then with me the horrid doubt always arises whether the convictions of man’s mind, which has been developed from the mind of the lower animals, are of any value or at all trustworthy. Would any one trust in the convictions of a monkey’s mind, if there are any convictions in such a mind?”3
They ask us to join in their celebrations but don’t give any reason for joy. How can we celebrate a Darwinian universe that has, as Dawkins described it, “no design, no purpose, no evil and no good, nothing but blind pitiless indifference”?4
Darryl Scott, whose teenage daughter was gunned down in the school library by a killer with Natural Selection emblazoned on his tee-shirt, found no comfort in Darwin. He said, “If children are taught that they came from slime, that they evolved from a lower form of life, and that there’s no future after death, then their views of life are affected by that … life really doesn’t have the meaning that it does to children who believe they are created in God’s image and that they have not only this life but a future life as well.”5
Nothing could be more uncaring than the entire process of organic evolution—William Provine, Professor of Biological Science, Cornell University.
William Provine, the son of a (liberal) minister, lost his professed faith to Darwin under the teaching of his evolutionary professor at university. He asks, “How can we have meaning in life? When we die we are really dead; nothing of us survives. Natural selection is a process leading every species almost certainly to extinction and ‘cares’ as much for the HIV virus as for humans. Nothing could be more uncaring than the entire process of organic evolution.”6
What is the sense of celebrating the uncaring process of evolution? C.S. Lewis wondered about this too, and whether there was a hidden agenda: “Does the whole vast structure of modern naturalism depend not on positive evidence but simply on an a priori metaphysical prejudice? Was it devised not to get in facts but to keep out God?”7
Keeping God out has consequences. Serial killer, Jeffrey Dahmer, who murdered 17 people before he was captured, said when interviewed in prison, “If a person doesn’t think there is a God to be accountable to, then—then what’s—what’s the point of—of trying to modify your behavior to keep it within acceptable ranges? That’s how I thought, anyway. I always believed the theory of evolution as truth that we all just came from the slime. When we died, you know, that was it, there is nothing … ”8
No, I find all this hoo-ha about the Darwin celebrations a bit contrived. So do lots of other people, according to the UK Guardian and UK Telegraph.9 Commenting on the latest polls the Telegraph said, “More than half of the public believe that the theory of evolution cannot explain the full complexity of life on Earth, and a ‘designer’ must have lent a hand.”
So, on the occasion of Darwin’s birthday in 2009, the Darwinists themselves would likely feel a bit unhappy about that result. Rather than celebrate, they must feel frustrated at not being able to convince the public after 150 years of continual indoctrination.
“Have Stalin, Mao, Hitler and Pol Pot apologized for their wars (against humanity itself)?”
Do Stalin, Mao, Hitler and Pol Pot represent all evolutionists? Hitler was a “Christian,” by the way. I suppose you think we should spit on Jesus and disregard Christianity, then?
If you deny unforgivable things have been done in the name of Christianity throughout history, I don’t know what to say to you other than “go back to sleep.” But it’s no stupider to blame Jesus when some screwballs garble his teachings than to blame Darwin when some power-thirsty dingbats draw false conclusions from evolutionary science.
“Darwin is the antidote to the biblical concept that all men are created equal.”
How so?
Good luck trying to present a rational argument on this thread. HA.
You have a lot of patience this evening...I will sit this one out.
Catholics like myself have np problem with God AND evolution being very compatible.
Created equal under God’s law, which has nothing to do with our respective drive or talents.
An IQ test would suffice for that as well.
My statement is self evident.
I have a lot of homework this evening, and I’m desperate for a reason to put it off.
Count me as yet another Christian who has no problem with God AND evolution. If the Book of Revelations can use symbols, why not Genesis?
That is not a real answer.
As opposed to the solid connection between Communism, Nazism, and the Origin of the Species? After all, Mein Kampf his filled with quotes from Darwin, Lenin and Stalin kept copies of Darwin's book on their bedside table, Mao put statues of Stalin in Red Square. </sarcasm>
Going back 500 years to drag up something that is totally irrelevant today is typical of someone with no argument.
Are there Christians groups today doing ANY of the things none in the past?
Atheists must necessarily believe that humans are no better than the bugs that are smashed on your windshield on a summer’s night. They also believe that there is no reward or punishment beyond this life so if you have enough power or nerve, you can do ANYTHING with no retribution.
Now, are there ATHEISTS who are murdering people by the thousands today?
When the leadership of Communist dictatorships criticize their former leaders, they are not apologizing. For instance, the Soviets had no problems with terror, they criticized Stalin for turning the Soviet terror-state against his fellow party members. When Christian Germany apologized for Hitler, they did so because they were breaking with their Nazi past. Big difference.
“If God is an architect, Darwin is his portable toilet pumper.”
And blaming Darwin for everything up to and including a rainy day is very typical of you.
Of course there is.
“Darwin is one of the greats. Newton and Einstein are right up there with him.”
Oh, please. To put Darwin up there with Newton and Einstein is a joke.
Darwin’s ideas were built on speculation upon speculation. There is no way to test his ideas because they are based on one-time events.
Newton’s ideas were based on repeatable testing under controlled conditions — the foundation of the scientific method. Not so with Darwin. Darwin is based on ideas which cannot be tested.
Darwinism has been used as the moral justification for so many bad ideas. He was a moderately talented taxonomist, possibly a plagarist, and the biggest ‘useful idiot’ of all time.
“Darwin is based on ideas which cannot be tested.”
I guess that puts neither evolutionists nor creationists in a position to criticize each other for relying on faith.
Deposing Islamist terrorist despots of course. Not politically correct, but a fact nevertheless.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.