All of Obama's Legal Cases

US Courts System ^ | 2/10/2009 | US Courts

[BP2]

338 Total Party matches for selection OBAMA, B
for ALL COURTS

Mon Feb 10 7:57:00 2009

Selections 1 through 54 (Page 1)

	Next 54

Civil Cases
	Name	Court	Case No.	Filed	NOS	Closed
1	OBAMA, B	ilcdce	3:2008cv03169	08/04/2008	440	08/15/2008
Armstead v. HSBC Card Services et al
2	OBAMA, B.	ilndce	1:2008cv04487	08/08/2008	550	09/23/2008
Luevano v. Obama et al
3	OBAMA, B. H.	hidce	1:2009cv00006	01/06/2009	441	01/27/2009
Roy v. Bush et al
4	OBAMA, B. H.	hidce	1:2009cv00041	01/29/2009	441
Roy v. Obama
5	OBAMA, B. H.	hidce	1:2008cv00362	08/11/2008	440	08/27/2008
Roy vs. USDC
6	OBAMA, B. H.	hidce	1:2008cv00424	09/22/2008	441	10/22/2008
Roy v. USA Govt et al
7	OBAMA, B. H.	hidce	1:2008cv00580	12/22/2008	441
Roy v. Obama et al
8	OBAMA, B.H.	hidce	1:2009cv00048	02/03/2009	440
Roy vs. Obama
9	OBAMA, B.H.	hidce	1:2008cv00448	10/08/2008	440	10/27/2008
Roy v. Federal Election Commission et al
10	OBAMA, BARACK	dedce	1:2009cv00014	12/29/2008	550
Gadson v. Obama et al
11	OBAMA, BARACK	nhdce	1:1997mc00024	12/04/1997	0	12/09/1997
WILSON MASTER FILE v. ALL DEFENDANTS, et al
12	OBAMA, BARACK	kyedce	3:2008cv00028	06/10/2008	530	07/11/2008
Becker v. Mukasey et al
13	OBAMA, BARACK	tnmdce	3:2008mc00036	02/01/2008		02/05/2008
Ervin v. Bush et al
14	OBAMA, BARACK	ilndce	1:2007cv00053	01/16/2007	550	01/16/2007
Awala v. Norgle et al
15	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2009cv00079	01/14/2009	550	01/14/2009
HYLAND v. OBAMA et al
16	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv00088	01/14/2005	550	11/25/2005
RIVERA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
17	OBAMA, BARACK	candce	3:2007cv00109	01/09/2007	440
Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc. et al v. Bush et al
18	OBAMA, BARACK	nddce	3:2008cv00126	12/16/2008	330
Gleeson v. McDonald
19	OBAMA, BARACK	tnmdce	3:2008cv00146	02/12/2008	440	02/12/2008
Ervin v. Bush et al
20	OBAMA, BARACK	txwdce	5:2008cv00159	02/28/2008	440	03/18/2008
Smith v. University of Texas At Austin et al
21	OBAMA, BARACK	nhdce	1:2008cv00185	05/09/2008	530	06/10/2008
Becker v. Blightler et al
22	OBAMA, BARACK	flndce	1:2007cv00187	09/28/2007	440	10/06/2008
MORRIS v. BUSH et al
23	OBAMA, BARACK	caedce	1:2006cv00195	02/22/2006	530	04/10/2006
(HC) Thomas v. Federal Congress et al
24	OBAMA, BARACK	flndce	1:2008cv00208	09/26/2008	440	12/12/2008
MORRIS v. LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO et al
25	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv00270	02/04/2005	530	04/09/2007
EL-MASHAD et al v. BUSH et al
26	OBAMA, BARACK	flmdce	3:2008cv00284	03/20/2008	441
Bloom et al v. The Democratic National Committe et al
27	OBAMA, BARACK	mndce	0:2008cv00360	02/11/2008	440	03/19/2008
Sinclair v. Obama et al
28	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv00492	03/10/2005	530	04/09/2007
AZIZ et al v. BUSH et al
29	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv00569	03/18/2005	530	04/09/2007
SALAHI et al v. BUSH et al
30	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv00748	04/11/2005	530	05/30/2007
ABOASSY et al v. BUSH et al
31	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv00765	04/15/2005	530
HABASHI et al v. BUSH et al
32	OBAMA, BARACK	ilndce	1:1996cv00823	02/13/1996	440	03/04/1996
Ewell v. Bd of Elect Comm, et al
33	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv00877	05/03/2005	530	04/09/2007
KHIALI-GUL v. BUSH et al
34	OBAMA, BARACK	flmdce	8:2008cv00948	03/20/2008	441	05/28/2008
Bloom et al v. The Democratic National Committe et al
35	OBAMA, BARACK	flmdce	3:2007cv00964	10/11/2007	440	11/26/2007
Herbert v. United States of America et al
36	OBAMA, BARACK	paedce	2:2006cv01055	03/09/2006	550	07/26/2006
RICHES v. BUSH et al
37	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv01124	06/07/2005	530	05/30/2007
MOUSOVI et al v. BUSH et al
38	OBAMA, BARACK	miwdce	1:2008cv01154	12/08/2008	440	01/06/2009
Hyland #228879 v. Levin et al
39	OBAMA, BARACK	flmdce	3:2008cv01164	12/04/2008	440
Herbert v. Obama et al
40	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv01189	06/14/2005	530	04/09/2007
KHALIFH et al v. BUSH et al
41	OBAMA, BARACK	flmdce	3:2008cv01201	12/15/2008	440	01/21/2009
Herbert v. United States of America et al
42	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2008cv01224	07/17/2008	530
GUL v. BUSH et al
43	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2008cv01228	07/17/2008	530
HADI v. BUSH et al
44	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2008cv01232	07/17/2008	530
BIN ATEF v. BUSH et al
45	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2008cv01237	07/17/2008	530
AL WADY v. BUSH et al
46	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv01353	07/05/2005	530	05/09/2007
SAIB et al v. BUSH et al
47	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2008cv01430	08/18/2008	550	09/11/2008
THORNTON-BEY v. OBAMA
48	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv01487	06/13/2008	530
SADKHAN v. BUSH et al
49	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv01497	07/29/2005	530
AL WIRGHI et al v. BUSH et al
50	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv01506	07/28/2005	530	05/15/2007
SHAFIIQ et al v. BUSH et al
51	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv01592	08/09/2005	530
ATTASH et al v. BUSH et al
52	OBAMA, BARACK	moedce	4:2008cv01757	11/12/2008	550	01/08/2009
Towne v. Obama
53	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2006cv01758	07/31/2008	530
SULIMAN et al v. BUSH et al
54	OBAMA, BARACK	candce	M:2006cv01791	08/14/2006	440
In re National Security Agency Telecommunications Records Litigation

Next 54 ALL of Obama, Soetoro Court Cases on Scribd

[nufsed]

Please help me out on 120.

[mlo]

"He is obligated to show that he is qualified. Not expect all of us to prove the negative."

He already passed the hurdles of what he was "obligated" to do. He isn't obligated to show us anything. If you want this to go anywhere, you must produce solid evidence, if not proof, that he was not born in the US. Asking for that is not proving a negative.

[mlo]

"No evidence is not the same as "no proof"

I don't know how you figure that one. How can you have proof if you dont' even have evidence?

[mlo]

"Write a letter to the president. Tell him you know he's qualified, but you are trying to convince some idiots on a web site. Tell him you want to shut them and the millions of others up for the next 8 years. Ask him to open his records, so we can prove what idiots they are."

You know, if I believed that would actually work, I'd do it. But we all know that letter would be round filed.

[nufsed]

Sorry, your comments are weak and unconvincing to me. It is so simple for him to provide the proof and he refuses to do so. This is the act of a guilty person and he has an obligation to us do so.

You have no evidence that any official party ever verified his qualifications. I on the other hand have evidence that the secretary of state of cal did not. I posted that evidence here and provided it to Alan Keyes.

Please provide name, documents list, location, and date for when he was verified as a natural born citizen and thus qualified to be president.

I know you won't do what I suggested in 120 because you really don't want the argument to end. If you did, you would ask him to put up and show us to be the fools you actuallty think we are.

[classical artist]

Yes your sister is an American Citizen, but since she was born outside of the US she most likely would not be considered a “Natural born Citizen”. Article II section I of the Constitution: “No person except a natural born Citizen,....shall be eligible to the office of President”. March 4,1789, goes into effect. At that time in history it was well known to mean: a citizen born on the soil to citizen parents. It needs to be debated in the Supreme Court. Except for Chester Arthur no other President was not a NBC & at the time they did not know that C.A. wasn’t. There are a lot of sites that will define NBC.

[DMZFrank]

Yes there is and that is undivided allegiance. His allegiance was divided byb his BIRTH circumstance.

[nufsed]

Don’t underetsmate what a letter from some clear thinking people like you would do.

[nufsed]

"He already passed the hurdles of what he was "obligated" to do. He isn't obligated to show us anything."

Contradictory statements. As I stated earlier, provide evidence that he "passed" the hurdles and proved he is a natural born citizen.

[nufsed]

Please provide name, documents list, location, and date for when he was verified as a natural born citizen and thus qualified to be president.

second request

[mlo]

"Sorry, your comments are weak and unconvincing to me. It is so simple for him to provide the proof and he refuses to do so. This is the act of a guilty person and he has an obligation to us do so."

Labeling things "weak and unconvincing" because you don't like them, is weak and unconvincing.

The only people he was obligated to prove anything to were all the officials in the party, the state governments, the electors, the Congress, who demanded any proof. If they didn't demand enough, it should be taken up with them.

He was asked to provide a copy of his birth certificate and he did. It was posted on the internet. That isn't a guilty act. All the rest is silly birther nonsense in frivolous lawsuits and internet forums and ignoring that stuff is not "guilty", it's exactly what you'd expect.

[mlo]

"Contradictory statements"

That was not a contradictory statement. Read it again.

[mlo]

The point right now is not whether he’s proven to be a natural born citizen. I’m asking for the proof that he isn’t.

[DMZFrank]

You continually ignore the only distinction of “natural born citizen. A “citizen’ can hold any office of the US that he is otherwise not disqualified for, (mayor, governor, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Senator or Congressman) but the only distinction attaching to NBC is eligibility to the office of POTUS. Foreign citizenship law DOES apply to NBC status (not ordinary citizenship) if those laws give foreign citizenship at birth.

[mlo]

"Yes there is and that is undivided allegiance."

No. That is a birther myth. The law recognizes no such thing.

If one is born in the United States one is a natural born citizen, unless one is the child of an ambassador or a soldier of an invading army.

[DMZFrank]

But because of an Italian law, I’m considered an Italian citizen.

And you are not eligble for POTUS. You can still be a US citizen and be eligble for everything else.

[nufsed]

We have now gone full circle. Ask him. He controls the access. Your argument is bankrupt of logic. You can't prove any one ever vetted him, yet you refer to him being qualified. You have nothing.

I on the other hand have knowledge that the evidence exists and merely need some one in position of authority or public pressure to prove my allegations or disprove them. You refuse to help provide the public pressure that would end the argument. What are you afraid of?

[Red Steel]

Nobody said they did. The question was what if they did? By the logic being used here, Togo could disqualify everyone from being President. Does that make sense?

Your buddy posed the question.

Questioning his divided loyalty is *certainly* appropriate. But it's a political issue. The election is over.

Obama's lack of legitimacy question continues.

[mlo]

I ask for your proof that he is not a natural born citizen and you say, "ask him", and say *I'm* illogical? I'm afraid you don't understand logic very well.

"You can't prove any one ever vetted him, yet you refer to him being qualified."

I didn't refer to him being qualifed. I said he wasn't obligated to produce anything at this point. None of which answers the question I'm asking. Where is your proof?

[Jim Noble]

How about the Indonesian School record that shows that Obama is Muslim, does that mean anything?

No.

He's an atheist.