Posted on 02/10/2009 7:27:57 AM PST by BP2
Mon Feb 10 7:57:00 2009 |
Selections 1 through 54 (Page 1) |
![]() |
|
|
![]() |
Civil Cases | |||||||
|
Name | Court | Case No. | Filed | NOS | Closed | |
1 | OBAMA, B | ilcdce | 3:2008cv03169 | 08/04/2008 | 440 | 08/15/2008 | |
Armstead v. HSBC Card Services et al | |||||||
2 | OBAMA, B. | ilndce | 1:2008cv04487 | 08/08/2008 | 550 | 09/23/2008 | |
Luevano v. Obama et al | |||||||
3 | OBAMA, B. H. | hidce | 1:2009cv00006 | 01/06/2009 | 441 | 01/27/2009 | |
Roy v. Bush et al | |||||||
4 | OBAMA, B. H. | hidce | 1:2009cv00041 | 01/29/2009 | 441 | ||
Roy v. Obama | |||||||
5 | OBAMA, B. H. | hidce | 1:2008cv00362 | 08/11/2008 | 440 | 08/27/2008 | |
Roy vs. USDC | |||||||
6 | OBAMA, B. H. | hidce | 1:2008cv00424 | 09/22/2008 | 441 | 10/22/2008 | |
Roy v. USA Govt et al | |||||||
7 | OBAMA, B. H. | hidce | 1:2008cv00580 | 12/22/2008 | 441 | ||
Roy v. Obama et al | |||||||
8 | OBAMA, B.H. | hidce | 1:2009cv00048 | 02/03/2009 | 440 | ||
Roy vs. Obama | |||||||
9 | OBAMA, B.H. | hidce | 1:2008cv00448 | 10/08/2008 | 440 | 10/27/2008 | |
Roy v. Federal Election Commission et al | |||||||
10 | OBAMA, BARACK | dedce | 1:2009cv00014 | 12/29/2008 | 550 | ||
Gadson v. Obama et al | |||||||
11 | OBAMA, BARACK | nhdce | 1:1997mc00024 | 12/04/1997 | 0 | 12/09/1997 | |
WILSON MASTER FILE v. ALL DEFENDANTS, et al | |||||||
12 | OBAMA, BARACK | kyedce | 3:2008cv00028 | 06/10/2008 | 530 | 07/11/2008 | |
Becker v. Mukasey et al | |||||||
13 | OBAMA, BARACK | tnmdce | 3:2008mc00036 | 02/01/2008 | 02/05/2008 | ||
Ervin v. Bush et al | |||||||
14 | OBAMA, BARACK | ilndce | 1:2007cv00053 | 01/16/2007 | 550 | 01/16/2007 | |
Awala v. Norgle et al | |||||||
15 | OBAMA, BARACK | dcdce | 1:2009cv00079 | 01/14/2009 | 550 | 01/14/2009 | |
HYLAND v. OBAMA et al | |||||||
16 | OBAMA, BARACK | dcdce | 1:2005cv00088 | 01/14/2005 | 550 | 11/25/2005 | |
RIVERA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al | |||||||
17 | OBAMA, BARACK | candce | 3:2007cv00109 | 01/09/2007 | 440 | ||
Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc. et al v. Bush et al | |||||||
18 | OBAMA, BARACK | nddce | 3:2008cv00126 | 12/16/2008 | 330 | ||
Gleeson v. McDonald | |||||||
19 | OBAMA, BARACK | tnmdce | 3:2008cv00146 | 02/12/2008 | 440 | 02/12/2008 | |
Ervin v. Bush et al | |||||||
20 | OBAMA, BARACK | txwdce | 5:2008cv00159 | 02/28/2008 | 440 | 03/18/2008 | |
Smith v. University of Texas At Austin et al | |||||||
21 | OBAMA, BARACK | nhdce | 1:2008cv00185 | 05/09/2008 | 530 | 06/10/2008 | |
Becker v. Blightler et al | |||||||
22 | OBAMA, BARACK | flndce | 1:2007cv00187 | 09/28/2007 | 440 | 10/06/2008 | |
MORRIS v. BUSH et al | |||||||
23 | OBAMA, BARACK | caedce | 1:2006cv00195 | 02/22/2006 | 530 | 04/10/2006 | |
(HC) Thomas v. Federal Congress et al | |||||||
24 | OBAMA, BARACK | flndce | 1:2008cv00208 | 09/26/2008 | 440 | 12/12/2008 | |
MORRIS v. LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO et al | |||||||
25 | OBAMA, BARACK | dcdce | 1:2005cv00270 | 02/04/2005 | 530 | 04/09/2007 | |
EL-MASHAD et al v. BUSH et al | |||||||
26 | OBAMA, BARACK | flmdce | 3:2008cv00284 | 03/20/2008 | 441 | ||
Bloom et al v. The Democratic National Committe et al | |||||||
27 | OBAMA, BARACK | mndce | 0:2008cv00360 | 02/11/2008 | 440 | 03/19/2008 | |
Sinclair v. Obama et al | |||||||
28 | OBAMA, BARACK | dcdce | 1:2005cv00492 | 03/10/2005 | 530 | 04/09/2007 | |
AZIZ et al v. BUSH et al | |||||||
29 | OBAMA, BARACK | dcdce | 1:2005cv00569 | 03/18/2005 | 530 | 04/09/2007 | |
SALAHI et al v. BUSH et al | |||||||
30 | OBAMA, BARACK | dcdce | 1:2005cv00748 | 04/11/2005 | 530 | 05/30/2007 | |
ABOASSY et al v. BUSH et al | |||||||
31 | OBAMA, BARACK | dcdce | 1:2005cv00765 | 04/15/2005 | 530 | ||
HABASHI et al v. BUSH et al | |||||||
32 | OBAMA, BARACK | ilndce | 1:1996cv00823 | 02/13/1996 | 440 | 03/04/1996 | |
Ewell v. Bd of Elect Comm, et al | |||||||
33 | OBAMA, BARACK | dcdce | 1:2005cv00877 | 05/03/2005 | 530 | 04/09/2007 | |
KHIALI-GUL v. BUSH et al | |||||||
34 | OBAMA, BARACK | flmdce | 8:2008cv00948 | 03/20/2008 | 441 | 05/28/2008 | |
Bloom et al v. The Democratic National Committe et al | |||||||
35 | OBAMA, BARACK | flmdce | 3:2007cv00964 | 10/11/2007 | 440 | 11/26/2007 | |
Herbert v. United States of America et al | |||||||
36 | OBAMA, BARACK | paedce | 2:2006cv01055 | 03/09/2006 | 550 | 07/26/2006 | |
RICHES v. BUSH et al | |||||||
37 | OBAMA, BARACK | dcdce | 1:2005cv01124 | 06/07/2005 | 530 | 05/30/2007 | |
MOUSOVI et al v. BUSH et al | |||||||
38 | OBAMA, BARACK | miwdce | 1:2008cv01154 | 12/08/2008 | 440 | 01/06/2009 | |
Hyland #228879 v. Levin et al | |||||||
39 | OBAMA, BARACK | flmdce | 3:2008cv01164 | 12/04/2008 | 440 | ||
Herbert v. Obama et al | |||||||
40 | OBAMA, BARACK | dcdce | 1:2005cv01189 | 06/14/2005 | 530 | 04/09/2007 | |
KHALIFH et al v. BUSH et al | |||||||
41 | OBAMA, BARACK | flmdce | 3:2008cv01201 | 12/15/2008 | 440 | 01/21/2009 | |
Herbert v. United States of America et al | |||||||
42 | OBAMA, BARACK | dcdce | 1:2008cv01224 | 07/17/2008 | 530 | ||
GUL v. BUSH et al | |||||||
43 | OBAMA, BARACK | dcdce | 1:2008cv01228 | 07/17/2008 | 530 | ||
HADI v. BUSH et al | |||||||
44 | OBAMA, BARACK | dcdce | 1:2008cv01232 | 07/17/2008 | 530 | ||
BIN ATEF v. BUSH et al | |||||||
45 | OBAMA, BARACK | dcdce | 1:2008cv01237 | 07/17/2008 | 530 | ||
AL WADY v. BUSH et al | |||||||
46 | OBAMA, BARACK | dcdce | 1:2005cv01353 | 07/05/2005 | 530 | 05/09/2007 | |
SAIB et al v. BUSH et al | |||||||
47 | OBAMA, BARACK | dcdce | 1:2008cv01430 | 08/18/2008 | 550 | 09/11/2008 | |
THORNTON-BEY v. OBAMA | |||||||
48 | OBAMA, BARACK | dcdce | 1:2005cv01487 | 06/13/2008 | 530 | ||
SADKHAN v. BUSH et al | |||||||
49 | OBAMA, BARACK | dcdce | 1:2005cv01497 | 07/29/2005 | 530 | ||
AL WIRGHI et al v. BUSH et al | |||||||
50 | OBAMA, BARACK | dcdce | 1:2005cv01506 | 07/28/2005 | 530 | 05/15/2007 | |
SHAFIIQ et al v. BUSH et al | |||||||
51 | OBAMA, BARACK | dcdce | 1:2005cv01592 | 08/09/2005 | 530 | ||
ATTASH et al v. BUSH et al | |||||||
52 | OBAMA, BARACK | moedce | 4:2008cv01757 | 11/12/2008 | 550 | 01/08/2009 | |
Towne v. Obama | |||||||
53 | OBAMA, BARACK | dcdce | 1:2006cv01758 | 07/31/2008 | 530 | ||
SULIMAN et al v. BUSH et al | |||||||
54 | OBAMA, BARACK | candce | M:2006cv01791 | 08/14/2006 | 440 | ||
In re National Security Agency Telecommunications Records Litigation |
|
![]()
ALL of Obama, Soetoro Court Cases on Scribd |
Please help me out on 120.
He already passed the hurdles of what he was "obligated" to do. He isn't obligated to show us anything. If you want this to go anywhere, you must produce solid evidence, if not proof, that he was not born in the US. Asking for that is not proving a negative.
I don't know how you figure that one. How can you have proof if you dont' even have evidence?
You know, if I believed that would actually work, I'd do it. But we all know that letter would be round filed.
You have no evidence that any official party ever verified his qualifications. I on the other hand have evidence that the secretary of state of cal did not. I posted that evidence here and provided it to Alan Keyes.
Please provide name, documents list, location, and date for when he was verified as a natural born citizen and thus qualified to be president.
I know you won't do what I suggested in 120 because you really don't want the argument to end. If you did, you would ask him to put up and show us to be the fools you actuallty think we are.
Yes your sister is an American Citizen, but since she was born outside of the US she most likely would not be considered a “Natural born Citizen”. Article II section I of the Constitution: “No person except a natural born Citizen,....shall be eligible to the office of President”. March 4,1789, goes into effect. At that time in history it was well known to mean: a citizen born on the soil to citizen parents. It needs to be debated in the Supreme Court. Except for Chester Arthur no other President was not a NBC & at the time they did not know that C.A. wasn’t. There are a lot of sites that will define NBC.
Yes there is and that is undivided allegiance. His allegiance was divided byb his BIRTH circumstance.
Don’t underetsmate what a letter from some clear thinking people like you would do.
Contradictory statements. As I stated earlier, provide evidence that he "passed" the hurdles and proved he is a natural born citizen.
second request
Labeling things "weak and unconvincing" because you don't like them, is weak and unconvincing.
The only people he was obligated to prove anything to were all the officials in the party, the state governments, the electors, the Congress, who demanded any proof. If they didn't demand enough, it should be taken up with them.
He was asked to provide a copy of his birth certificate and he did. It was posted on the internet. That isn't a guilty act. All the rest is silly birther nonsense in frivolous lawsuits and internet forums and ignoring that stuff is not "guilty", it's exactly what you'd expect.
That was not a contradictory statement. Read it again.
The point right now is not whether he’s proven to be a natural born citizen. I’m asking for the proof that he isn’t.
You continually ignore the only distinction of “natural born citizen. A “citizen’ can hold any office of the US that he is otherwise not disqualified for, (mayor, governor, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs, Senator or Congressman) but the only distinction attaching to NBC is eligibility to the office of POTUS. Foreign citizenship law DOES apply to NBC status (not ordinary citizenship) if those laws give foreign citizenship at birth.
No. That is a birther myth. The law recognizes no such thing.
If one is born in the United States one is a natural born citizen, unless one is the child of an ambassador or a soldier of an invading army.
But because of an Italian law, I’m considered an Italian citizen.
And you are not eligble for POTUS. You can still be a US citizen and be eligble for everything else.
I on the other hand have knowledge that the evidence exists and merely need some one in position of authority or public pressure to prove my allegations or disprove them. You refuse to help provide the public pressure that would end the argument. What are you afraid of?
Your buddy posed the question.
Questioning his divided loyalty is *certainly* appropriate. But it's a political issue. The election is over.
Obama's lack of legitimacy question continues.
"You can't prove any one ever vetted him, yet you refer to him being qualified."
I didn't refer to him being qualifed. I said he wasn't obligated to produce anything at this point. None of which answers the question I'm asking. Where is your proof?
No.
He's an atheist.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.