All of Obama's Legal Cases

US Courts System ^ | 2/10/2009 | US Courts

[BP2]

338 Total Party matches for selection OBAMA, B
for ALL COURTS

Mon Feb 10 7:57:00 2009

Selections 1 through 54 (Page 1)

	Next 54

Civil Cases
	Name	Court	Case No.	Filed	NOS	Closed
1	OBAMA, B	ilcdce	3:2008cv03169	08/04/2008	440	08/15/2008
Armstead v. HSBC Card Services et al
2	OBAMA, B.	ilndce	1:2008cv04487	08/08/2008	550	09/23/2008
Luevano v. Obama et al
3	OBAMA, B. H.	hidce	1:2009cv00006	01/06/2009	441	01/27/2009
Roy v. Bush et al
4	OBAMA, B. H.	hidce	1:2009cv00041	01/29/2009	441
Roy v. Obama
5	OBAMA, B. H.	hidce	1:2008cv00362	08/11/2008	440	08/27/2008
Roy vs. USDC
6	OBAMA, B. H.	hidce	1:2008cv00424	09/22/2008	441	10/22/2008
Roy v. USA Govt et al
7	OBAMA, B. H.	hidce	1:2008cv00580	12/22/2008	441
Roy v. Obama et al
8	OBAMA, B.H.	hidce	1:2009cv00048	02/03/2009	440
Roy vs. Obama
9	OBAMA, B.H.	hidce	1:2008cv00448	10/08/2008	440	10/27/2008
Roy v. Federal Election Commission et al
10	OBAMA, BARACK	dedce	1:2009cv00014	12/29/2008	550
Gadson v. Obama et al
11	OBAMA, BARACK	nhdce	1:1997mc00024	12/04/1997	0	12/09/1997
WILSON MASTER FILE v. ALL DEFENDANTS, et al
12	OBAMA, BARACK	kyedce	3:2008cv00028	06/10/2008	530	07/11/2008
Becker v. Mukasey et al
13	OBAMA, BARACK	tnmdce	3:2008mc00036	02/01/2008		02/05/2008
Ervin v. Bush et al
14	OBAMA, BARACK	ilndce	1:2007cv00053	01/16/2007	550	01/16/2007
Awala v. Norgle et al
15	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2009cv00079	01/14/2009	550	01/14/2009
HYLAND v. OBAMA et al
16	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv00088	01/14/2005	550	11/25/2005
RIVERA v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA et al
17	OBAMA, BARACK	candce	3:2007cv00109	01/09/2007	440
Al-Haramain Islamic Foundation, Inc. et al v. Bush et al
18	OBAMA, BARACK	nddce	3:2008cv00126	12/16/2008	330
Gleeson v. McDonald
19	OBAMA, BARACK	tnmdce	3:2008cv00146	02/12/2008	440	02/12/2008
Ervin v. Bush et al
20	OBAMA, BARACK	txwdce	5:2008cv00159	02/28/2008	440	03/18/2008
Smith v. University of Texas At Austin et al
21	OBAMA, BARACK	nhdce	1:2008cv00185	05/09/2008	530	06/10/2008
Becker v. Blightler et al
22	OBAMA, BARACK	flndce	1:2007cv00187	09/28/2007	440	10/06/2008
MORRIS v. BUSH et al
23	OBAMA, BARACK	caedce	1:2006cv00195	02/22/2006	530	04/10/2006
(HC) Thomas v. Federal Congress et al
24	OBAMA, BARACK	flndce	1:2008cv00208	09/26/2008	440	12/12/2008
MORRIS v. LOYOLA UNIVERSITY CHICAGO et al
25	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv00270	02/04/2005	530	04/09/2007
EL-MASHAD et al v. BUSH et al
26	OBAMA, BARACK	flmdce	3:2008cv00284	03/20/2008	441
Bloom et al v. The Democratic National Committe et al
27	OBAMA, BARACK	mndce	0:2008cv00360	02/11/2008	440	03/19/2008
Sinclair v. Obama et al
28	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv00492	03/10/2005	530	04/09/2007
AZIZ et al v. BUSH et al
29	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv00569	03/18/2005	530	04/09/2007
SALAHI et al v. BUSH et al
30	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv00748	04/11/2005	530	05/30/2007
ABOASSY et al v. BUSH et al
31	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv00765	04/15/2005	530
HABASHI et al v. BUSH et al
32	OBAMA, BARACK	ilndce	1:1996cv00823	02/13/1996	440	03/04/1996
Ewell v. Bd of Elect Comm, et al
33	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv00877	05/03/2005	530	04/09/2007
KHIALI-GUL v. BUSH et al
34	OBAMA, BARACK	flmdce	8:2008cv00948	03/20/2008	441	05/28/2008
Bloom et al v. The Democratic National Committe et al
35	OBAMA, BARACK	flmdce	3:2007cv00964	10/11/2007	440	11/26/2007
Herbert v. United States of America et al
36	OBAMA, BARACK	paedce	2:2006cv01055	03/09/2006	550	07/26/2006
RICHES v. BUSH et al
37	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv01124	06/07/2005	530	05/30/2007
MOUSOVI et al v. BUSH et al
38	OBAMA, BARACK	miwdce	1:2008cv01154	12/08/2008	440	01/06/2009
Hyland #228879 v. Levin et al
39	OBAMA, BARACK	flmdce	3:2008cv01164	12/04/2008	440
Herbert v. Obama et al
40	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv01189	06/14/2005	530	04/09/2007
KHALIFH et al v. BUSH et al
41	OBAMA, BARACK	flmdce	3:2008cv01201	12/15/2008	440	01/21/2009
Herbert v. United States of America et al
42	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2008cv01224	07/17/2008	530
GUL v. BUSH et al
43	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2008cv01228	07/17/2008	530
HADI v. BUSH et al
44	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2008cv01232	07/17/2008	530
BIN ATEF v. BUSH et al
45	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2008cv01237	07/17/2008	530
AL WADY v. BUSH et al
46	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv01353	07/05/2005	530	05/09/2007
SAIB et al v. BUSH et al
47	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2008cv01430	08/18/2008	550	09/11/2008
THORNTON-BEY v. OBAMA
48	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv01487	06/13/2008	530
SADKHAN v. BUSH et al
49	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv01497	07/29/2005	530
AL WIRGHI et al v. BUSH et al
50	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv01506	07/28/2005	530	05/15/2007
SHAFIIQ et al v. BUSH et al
51	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2005cv01592	08/09/2005	530
ATTASH et al v. BUSH et al
52	OBAMA, BARACK	moedce	4:2008cv01757	11/12/2008	550	01/08/2009
Towne v. Obama
53	OBAMA, BARACK	dcdce	1:2006cv01758	07/31/2008	530
SULIMAN et al v. BUSH et al
54	OBAMA, BARACK	candce	M:2006cv01791	08/14/2006	440
In re National Security Agency Telecommunications Records Litigation

Next 54 ALL of Obama, Soetoro Court Cases on Scribd

[mojitojoe]

Where is your proof that Obama was born outside the US? It’s that simple. Where is it?

Go tell Shauna (your boss)to show proof he is. Until he does, it's never going away and don't think that by coming here that all attention is focused on the BC. There are many things that are being not said on here. You think that they are going to post the good stuff here and let you endlessly drone on and attempt to refute it? Hell no. There is solid evidence, growing each day and you aren't going to get it out of them on here.

[Dajjal]

obumpa

[Red Steel]

Why is it an absurd argument? In both cases you're giving a foreign law control over US citizenship status.

First of all no nation has ever past such a silly law. And there would be no tangible or intangible connection to that nation for the citizens of the United States if a nation passed such absurdity.

Second, Obama lived in Indonesia and most likely still has an Indonesian citizenship. He traveled to Pakistan probably on an Indonesian passport. So questioning Obama's divided loyalty to our nation is very credible and that divided loyalty to other nation(s) is adverse to the US Constitution.

[mlo]

"We're waiting for Obama to show us the proof. The burden is on him."

No, the burden isn't on him. He's already the President. He showed whatever he was required to show. If you want to get anywhere you need to produce proof that he isn't eligible.

[mlo]

"The point is he thinks he can get by without presenting his vault form BC which has the information on it.....Sooner or later it will catch up with him.

If not exposed after all legal avenues are extinquished, non legal efforts will expose it. Blackmail, Someone selling it to the Enquirer, ....someone will think the effort is worth the consequences."

All this *assumes* that he really isn't eligible. Where is the proof of that?

[mlo]

"You cannot ask people to produce evidence which is being hidden by the alleged guilty party. Only he can do that."

I can expect people not believe in things for which they have no evidence. Clearly there are people here who are convinced he is not eligible in fact. I'm asking them for their proof.

[Frantzie]

Dr. Edwin Vieira does not believe a he is a NBC and that it will come out. All of Obama’s actions with the fake COLB, the factcheck.org submitted to the court as evidence, the sealed records and many other things are proof he is covering it up. Why?

If you are so sure then why are you bothering posting. Obama’s people are concerned and posts like your are just more proof.

[mlo]

"But not even Obama is disputing the validity of his birthright Brit citizenship. Since that citizenship obtained thru his father, (not by a whimsical grant from a foreign nation)and is most likely a legal fact, than that fact should be adjudicated with consideration to his natural born citizenship."

It is not relevant to his "natural born citizenship". Why should he dispute it? His father's status, or citizenship that some other country grants him, has no bearing.

[Red Steel]

He may be "President."

However, if it's found out later that he's not a natural born citizen he loses Constitutional legitimacy.

[Frantzie]

I hope so. I think the military will walk in large numbers. Some shill on another web site was saying how much the active military likes Obama and did not like Bush.

What is with Ed Hale? I stopped listening to him. I think Steve Pidgeon has some evidence and is laying low for now and is working with Orly. Orly is relentless.

[nufsed]

There IS evidence. It is in a file cabinet in Honolulu, the US passport office, and several universities. I have explained this to you on another thread. You keep wanting people to produce something that is in control of the accused.

Your position is illogical, unsustainable, and just let's the fraud accusations continue.

[mlo]

"First of all no nation has ever past such a silly law."

Nobody said they did. The question was what if they did? By the logic being used here, Togo could disqualify everyone from being President. Does that make sense?

"So questioning Obama's divided loyalty to our nation is very credible and that divided loyalty to other nation(s) is adverse to the US Constitution."

Questioning his divided loyalty is *certainly* appropriate. But it's a political issue. The election is over.

[mlo]

"There IS evidence. It is in a file cabinet in Honolulu, the US passport office, and several universities. I have explained this to you on another thread. You keep wanting people to produce something that is in control of the accused."

"Your position is illogical, unsustainable, and just let's the fraud accusations continue."

You don't have that evidence! That's exactly why you bring it up. So you can't base conclusions on evidence you don't have. Don't tell me *I'm* being illogical. Geez.

It's one thing to want to see some documents nobody has, and to speculate about what's in them. It's another thing completely to believe in a conclusion for which there is no evidence.

[mlo]

"However, if it's found out later that he's not a natural born citizen he loses Constitutional legitimacy."

*IF* it's found out later. I'm asking right now what proof exists that he is in fact ineligible? Those people who already believe it, what basis do they have?

[nufsed]

We agree, WE DON"T HAVE THE EVIDENCE. THAT IS THE POINT. He has them.

The documents exist. The records officer in Hawaii admitted that. One of the universities said they have his records but can't release them.

Just like Kerry and Clinton, he is hiding what all the others made public. Except in this case it goes to the constitutional requirement. He is obligated to show that he is qualified. Not expect all of us to prove the negative.

You have chosen not to respond to why he is acting like a guilty party. The reason is there is no legitimate explanation for a president to hide such critical information from the public.

[El Gato]

I can expect people not believe in things for which they have no evidence.

No evidence is not the same as "no proof". The proof could very well be on his long form birth certificate. Evidence is mounting. His own cabinet appointee, since withdrawn, stated he was an immigrant. A friend of his mother puts him in Seattle as a very young baby. The fact that the address shown in the birth announcement, and thus likely on whatever paperwork was used to generate it, was owned by someone else and never shows up as the residence of BHO Sr, or S.A. Dunham. Lots of evidence, not yet proof.

But proof that he was born in the US would be easy for him to provide, but he not done so. (Yes I know he's not been compelled to so, but that doesn't mean he couldn't).

[mlo]

"Once it is established legally (via the vault Birth Certificate) that Obama Sr. is in fact his father, he should be Article II, clause 5 disqualified on the basis that at birth he had an actionable claim of citizenship upon the British Empire, and therefore cannot possibly be a national born citizen, one prerequisite of which is undivided allegiance."

If one is born in the US, there is no other prerequisite to be a "natural born citizen".

[pickyourpoison]

bttt

[Bubba Ho-Tep]

First of all no nation has ever past such a silly law. And there would be no tangible or intangible connection to that nation for the citizens of the United States if a nation passed such absurdity.

So what? My great grandfather immigrated from Italy in 1913. Under Italian law, I'm considered an Italian citizen. If I produce a bunch of paperwork and show them, I can get an Italian passport. Am I a natural born citizen? After all, my parents were American citizens, my grandparents were American citizens. But because of an Italian law, I'm considered an Italian citizen.

Second, Obama lived in Indonesia and most likely still has an Indonesian citizenship. He traveled to Pakistan probably on an Indonesian passport.

Based on what evidence? You're not going to pull out that alleged travel ban to Pakistan again, are you? That's been utterly discredited by this time.

So questioning Obama's divided loyalty to our nation is very credible and that divided loyalty to other nation(s) is adverse to the US Constitution.

What credible affirmative evidence have birthers actually come up with? You've got a couple of affidavits, one of them apparently signed under a false name, and you've got a school ledger from Indonesia.

[nufsed]

I have a suggestion.

Write a letter to the president. Tell him you know he's qualified, but you are trying to convince some idiots on a web site. Tell him you want to shut them and the millions of others up for the next 8 years. Ask him to open his records, so we can prove what idiots they are.

I'll co-sign the letter.