I can expect people not believe in things for which they have no evidence. Clearly there are people here who are convinced he is not eligible in fact. I'm asking them for their proof.
Your position is illogical, unsustainable, and just let's the fraud accusations continue.
No evidence is not the same as "no proof". The proof could very well be on his long form birth certificate. Evidence is mounting. His own cabinet appointee, since withdrawn, stated he was an immigrant. A friend of his mother puts him in Seattle as a very young baby. The fact that the address shown in the birth announcement, and thus likely on whatever paperwork was used to generate it, was owned by someone else and never shows up as the residence of BHO Sr, or S.A. Dunham. Lots of evidence, not yet proof.
But proof that he was born in the US would be easy for him to provide, but he not done so. (Yes I know he's not been compelled to so, but that doesn't mean he couldn't).