Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama, Dems to make huge increase in military retiree healthcare premiums to pay for Porkulus
Moderate Voice, Vet Hotline ^ | 2/7/09 | Wind

Posted on 02/07/2009 6:30:18 PM PST by pabianice

In my “Another Innuendo Over a CBO Report: TRICARE For Life,” I pointed to a message from a “BG Bob Clements, USAF Ret (P38 Bob)” that is making the rounds through the internet, claiming:

Seems as though our President has placed a priority on cutting [TRICARE For Life] out of the budget as a means to provide funding for those things he promised during the campaign…Just another move to slight those of us who dedicated much of our adult lives to the defense of our country.

Tricare For Life (TFL) was instituted just a few years ago to correct the broken promise that veteran military retirees would receive free healthcare coverage for life. It covers the Medicare co-pay amount.

A heavy assault has begun on military veteran's retiree benefits in order to pay for the things the current democratic president promised during his campaign . It's a high priority of this administration.

It should be an item of high interest to the retired military community. If approved by congress this first assault wave would hit in 2011 and it would hit hard. It would initiate TFL cost sharing requiring military retirees over 65 to pay the first $525 of medical cost and then 50% of the next $4,725. This could amount to a first year cost of $2,888 per person. It would be indexed to increase with inflation. A reason given for this action (for PR effect) is "overuse" by retirees.

For those of you who are covered by TFL you'll want to pay attention (below) to what has surfaced about the future of TFL.

On page 189 of the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) report, (see the note below on how to get to that spot), there is a strong recommendation to eventually eliminate the TFL program as it is too expensive.

Another move to slight those who dedicated much of their adult lives to the defense of the country.

It's strongly recommended that all retired military vets contact their elected officials and register strong opposition to the addition of fees or the elimination of the TFL program.

At the CBO web site, please see:

a. Budget, Options, Volume 1: Health Care (http://www.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=9925)

For those who have never opened one of these web sites from OMB : 1. double click on the above URL 2. click on PDF 3. click on the binoculars 4. do a search for TFL It's guaranteed that if you sit on your behind and do nothing as these options are brought forward in the coming year, you'll lose a great health care benefit that Medicare eligible retired military have. It's a bit short of promises made that were fought so hard for back in the late 90s and early 2000s, but it's still one of the best health care programs anyone in the United States has.

Washington's professionals always look for the channel of least resistance when it comes to cutting programs and budgets. Military retirees are one of those channels of least resistance. They're noted for sitting around, doing nothing, and waiting for 'old Joe' to do something for them. They need to wake up and take action. Their medical benefits are a prime target. Don't lose out due to apathy.

One way to secure the TFL benefit is to write your elected congressional representatives -- those in both the House and the Senate. And, keep writing, and writing, and writing. ONCE IS NOT ENOUGH!! Keep repeating until you are blue in the face. Remember the old adage, 'the squeaky wheel gets the grease'.

Now, this concerns the younger military retirees out there, those who aren't on Medicare and TFL yet. Health care will eventually become a dominating factor in your life! Remember that -- it will impact you big time in your later years, unless you're fortunate(?) enough to die young from a heart attack or being run over by a truck. By acting now you can save that TFL benefit you'll be eligible for when you reach Medicare age.

The various service organizations that we belong to will put up a fight, but, they can't do it alone. They'll need your help.

If you're an Obama fan, and believe that change cometh, the TFL option proposed by OMB is change in the wrong direction. And, it won't fade away of its own accord. The current in-power administration needs to save the money they now spend on TFL in order to finance their other programs. Yes, programs for people who produce nothing but votes to keep the politicians in office.

Please forward this on to those you know that are Retired Military.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Crime/Corruption; Front Page News; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bho2009; bho44; bhodod; bhohealthcare; democrats; firsthundreddays; military; militaryfamilies; porkulus; tricare
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last
To: spectre
Our wonderful PCP isn't taking any new Tricare patients. He says the "reimbursment" is less than Medicare. He's also limiting his medicare patients these days. We're fortunate he still sees us.

As someone who is on active duty and is Tricare Prime Remote...I completely understand. The choice of doctors is slim...and I think they take it out of patriotism...because it certainly isn't due to the money they make. They do payout less than Medicare.

61 posted on 02/08/2009 10:47:00 AM PST by NELSON111
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: csmusaret

How long have you had your doctor? Since we moved to Texas within the past year maybe most doctors are not in the system. According to the doctors they have to go through so much red tape to get in the system they aren’t interested in joining. Older doctors in the system are probably leaving or no longer taking new patients. It is just not that easy.


62 posted on 02/08/2009 11:17:05 AM PST by Shire
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: Shire

I have been seeing the same doctor for 7 years now. It was my experience that doctors who accepted Medicare were more likely to accept Tricare, but I haven’t had any problems for years. Try to get some help from those overpaid egomaniacs in DC.


63 posted on 02/08/2009 11:20:17 AM PST by csmusaret (You can't spell Democrat without R-A-T.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Shire

You are right. It is not easy.

I live in Northern California. It is almost impossible to find doctors who accept Tri-Care.

I have the Tri-Care office try to find Dr.s for me. They find one, I call for an appt., the front desk asst. tells me they are no longer accepting Tri-Care. Happens all the time.

They say it is because Tri-Care doesn’t pay very much, and they take forever to pay out what they do pay.

I drive a few hours each way to go to a Military Base hospital. For routine appts. Use the local emergency room for well, emergencies. Tri-Care pays them after the fact.

The system stinks. Of course when something is broken, the government doesn’t fix it, they just charge more for it.


64 posted on 02/08/2009 2:31:06 PM PST by Aurorales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: GatorGirl
“Please don’t take offense. “I told you so” doesn’t apply to anyone who didn’t vote for him, now does it?”
__________________________________________

I do and did take offense. You threw out a blanket statement filled with arrogance. “told you so”.
And then you don't want me to take offense.
And now you reply with “now does it?”

Childish remarks from someone who doesn't care who they are offending because they are not affected.

Couldn't you just have apologized for your first snotty remark?

65 posted on 02/08/2009 2:36:45 PM PST by Aurorales
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: AdmSmith; Berosus; Convert from ECUSA; dervish; Ernest_at_the_Beach; Fred Nerks; justiceseeker93; ..

Yeah, Let’s Cap Salaries. Start With Harvard!
Red State | Feb 6, 2009 | Todd Huston
Posted on 02/05/2009 5:23:02 PM PST by SeekAndFind
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2179363/posts


66 posted on 02/09/2009 6:11:05 AM PST by SunkenCiv (https://secure.freerepublic.com/donate/____________________ Profile updated Monday, January 12, 2009)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pabianice

Next time don’t just skip to page 198, read page 5 first! This is just an OPTION, it’s not even proposed. It’s not in a bill, it has yet to be reviewed by the current President, Congress, or the Senate. Oh, and it hasn’t been voted on!

This is just like the elective options that were suggested in October 2008 for 401K plans as they were failing. Both of which were put forward under the Bush Admin, and no there not eliminating 401K’s either. Get your facts straight and stop bashing just one democrat because other ones thought up as many OPTIONS as they could to try and help fix our problems. Look it up yourself at http://WWW.cbo.gov/doc.cfm?index=9925


67 posted on 03/17/2009 6:52:21 PM PDT by Disable96 (Disabled96)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-67 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson