Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Just a thought about our elected "leaders"

Posted on 02/03/2009 7:16:28 PM PST by NedRocker

Why not have every politcal position in the US be subjected to an IRS audit?? I believe that if you fail to pay these insane taxes that you should not be able to hold public office, whether elected ot appointed. Maybe this demand will initiate a comprehensive tax reform i.e. flat tax.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: taxes

1 posted on 02/03/2009 7:16:28 PM PST by NedRocker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NedRocker

Nah, it’s so much more fun to catch them in the act.

Besides, few in elected office end up there on the spur of the moment. They’ll just make themselves “clean” before getting involved.


2 posted on 02/03/2009 7:19:03 PM PST by cripplecreek (The poor bastards have us surrounded.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NedRocker

Well see, you are expecting the “leaders” to police themselves.


3 posted on 02/03/2009 7:19:30 PM PST by autumnraine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NedRocker

Yes, every year even after they leave office and become lobbyists. And subject them to the same penalties as the rest of us! And any gun law should apply to the Secret service 5 years before it applies to anyone else.


4 posted on 02/03/2009 7:26:00 PM PST by MtnClimber (The audacity of looting the the taxpayers for the power porkulous gives the sewer 'rats!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NedRocker

If you did that, then only people “who don’t pay taxes” could be in public service.


5 posted on 02/03/2009 7:26:03 PM PST by Brilliant
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NedRocker

Let them pass the Rangel Rule first. I will stop paying taxes entirely and let them complain as long as they want. Then I will pay much later with no penalty. What’s good for the goose....


6 posted on 02/03/2009 7:27:33 PM PST by ritewingwarrior (Just say No to socialism.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NedRocker

May I add that I hate it when the media says the elected officials are public servants.....I don’t think so. They are paid too much. A public servant is slinging fruit cups at the local soup kitchen.


7 posted on 02/03/2009 7:28:19 PM PST by lilycicero (Just sayin....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NedRocker

ot=or


8 posted on 02/03/2009 7:29:44 PM PST by NedRocker (Jekyll Island revisited 2 years later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: autumnraine

Especially when the head of the IRS doesn’t pay the tax he owes.


9 posted on 02/03/2009 7:29:46 PM PST by NedRocker (Jekyll Island revisited 2 years later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: NedRocker

At first blush I liked the idea, but reality set in, and realizing our tax system is so convoluted and huge that no one entity could possibly know or understand all the myriad “gotchas” lurking within, I sadly realized not one person who has ever signed on the IRS form dotted line could pass a 100% accuracy scrutiny check. This would simply become a new catch all political witch hunt which would deter any sane person from ever running for elected office.

Case in point - the high rate of errors in answers provided by IRS help line employees to people calling in with questions.


10 posted on 02/03/2009 7:32:55 PM PST by caper gal 1 (Who is John Galt?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NedRocker

Good idea - BUT - THEM THAT DON’T PAY ARE IN CHARGE
Who ya gonna Call?


11 posted on 02/03/2009 7:36:22 PM PST by 4Speed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NedRocker
Here is a interesting read... 545 vs 300,000,000
12 posted on 02/03/2009 7:40:21 PM PST by tubebender (Your Tag Line offends me...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: ritewingwarrior
I like your idea about the Rangel rule...its a start. What if a prerequisite to running or being appointed to political office was an IRS audit? I am trying to pit one side against the other to achieve the desired result... a sane tax policy. The insane policy the citizens of this country are taxed is truely an abomination, to put it mildly.
13 posted on 02/03/2009 7:46:47 PM PST by NedRocker (Jekyll Island revisited 2 years later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: tubebender
I have read that and couldn't agree more!! Lets take it from the 545 to the hundreds that deem it necessary to look out for our well-being. I am thinking everything local, state and federal. Not only will it keep the IRS busy for decades, it might inspire a new tax code that is readable and simple.
14 posted on 02/03/2009 7:51:17 PM PST by NedRocker (Jekyll Island revisited 2 years later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: NedRocker

Not only an IRS audit, but any and all testing of any sort that is required of any American citizen on the government payroll in any capacity. Leadership demands undergoing whatever the followers are expected to undergo.


15 posted on 02/03/2009 8:05:30 PM PST by mathurine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mathurine

That too...I forgot that I am under subpoena for my urine and breath at any time. Even if I don’t have to pee.


16 posted on 02/03/2009 8:19:29 PM PST by NedRocker (Jekyll Island revisited 2 years later)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson