Posted on 02/03/2009 11:52:39 AM PST by dascallie
No. 08-570 ================================================================ In The Supreme Court of the United States --------------------------------- ♦ --------------------------------- PHILIP J. BERG, Petitioner, v. BARACK OBAMA, et al., Respondents. --------------------------------- ♦ --------------------------------- On Petition For A Writ Of Certiorari Before Judgment To The United States Court Of Appeals For The Third Circuit
"A potential constitutional crisis under President Barack Obama now looms more and more with each passing day. This Court must recognize that its duty to the nation and to the law in the instant case is far greater than that duty which Chief Baron Pollock faced in Byrne v. Boadle. "
(Excerpt) Read more at wthrockmorton.com ...
It was not an illusion. They all landed here in DC, befouling the place worse than geese.
Here you are trying to prove that ringing or haloing does not occur during the photoshop process
And here I am almost laughing out loud at your failure to understand what you have just done for me
all on this very thread!
By all means keep on exposing yourself I'm laughing at you and will continue to point out that you gave the best example of how haloing or ringing as you call it is constant with photoshop forgery.
And the difference between pigs and geese is the pigs will wallow in it.
Yes. Please do. Please show where I was trying to disprove haloing.
"Here you are trying to prove that ringing or haloing does not occur during the photoshop process"
Well, you've posted a link to my entire post but you haven't shown anything in there that attempts to "disprove haloing". As I've repeatedly told you, that's not what that post is about.
So go ahead, find something in that post that attempts to "disprove haloing" and post it right here.
Why do you spend so much time on something you don’t believe? Doesn’t it get boring? You aren’t going to make this go away. A military officer has now filed a lawsuit. GIVE IT UP. Let it play out. Your arguments day after day after day every time someone posts anything on the BC clearly show your agenda. Are you that afraid that your Messiah will be proven to be a liar and a fraud?
Polarik’s report isn’t what will break this case open. It will be the demand to show the original.
Had it not been for your tireless work to try to disprove that Obamas CoLB is a forgery I never would have been able to lead you into actually proving what I have said all along.
Give them enough rope, they always hang themselves. mlo worships the ground zer0 walks on.
That doesn't hide the fact that your efforts are the best proof I have that the ringing of haloing or anything you want to call the distortions around the lettering that displace the green background are the results of photo manipulation or photoshopping.
That has to suck, don't it?
Stop falsely attributing beliefs to me.
If you disagree with something say so. Deal with the issues, not the poster.
No. We are talking about different things. It is not semantics. How many times have I told you this already? Do yourself a favor and go back and read for understanding.
I was responding to one element of Polarik's report. Not yours, his. *Polarik* has specifically said the he does not think the halos are a result of forgery. I'm not addressing the halos. He's talking about something else. So am I.
You have misunderstood this from the begining and despite it being explained numerous times have refused to check yourself. Don't be stubborn, go back and try to understand what was being written.
I somewhat misspoke. The photos are discussed here:
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2175489/posts
but I did not address Polarik's treatment of projective geometry. The thread is worth reading from near the beginning to the end.
I’m taking a break if I laugh any harder at you I’ll get a bloody nose.
You have been pure entertainment>
No really you have!
It’s killing me to laugh so hard at anyone so oblivious
Apparently you are laughing so hard you are still unable to point to anything I wrote that resembles what you are claiming I wrote. That’s OK. It’s obvious that you can’t, there’s no need to acknowledge it.
If as you say Polarik says it isn't a result of forgery, then why would you discuss it at all?
Are you trying to discredit him by proving that ringing IS A RESULT OF FORGERY BY PHOTOSHOP?
I've already explained this several times. The ringing was not the subject I was discussing. I was discussing the supposed missing green pixels between the letters, between the ringing.
"Are you trying to discredit him by proving that ringing IS A RESULT OF FORGERY BY PHOTOSHOP?"
NO. I didn't address the ringing at all because his claim isn't about the ringing. That's what I've been telling you all along. Read what I wrote.
I was discussing the supposed missing green pixels between the letters, between the ringing.
You mean the pixels displaced by the white haloing around the letters in those places that should have been green but weren't?
Were you trying to prove that was natural?
You certainly did a very poor job of doing so because you made the best case yet that the absence of green pixels in certain areas showed that the letters were cut and pasted into place causing the ringing or haloing you weren't talking about.....
No, the pixels between the letters, between the halos.
"You certainly did a very poor job of doing so because you made the best case yet that the absence of green pixels in certain areas showed that the letters were cut and pasted into place causing the ringing or haloing you weren't talking about....."
Still completely wrong. The halos are not the issue. I pasted the halos in along with the letters. The space between them was the issue. You're the one going on about the halos so you assumed that's what the discussion was about, despite the fact that it was explained otherwise in my post.
What does the Mandarin Hotel in Hong Kong have to do with this discussion?
Why because sometimes it is green and sometimes it is not.
Tthis picture is your proof that haloing or ringing is not proof of photo shoping because we can still see some green pixels between the letters in a couple of areas.....
Watch this....
using a thin pink line I will show the areas effected by the select process vs the areas where the green was unaffected by the placement of the selected text.
The ringing or haloing you are not talking about and weren't trying to disprove is the proof even a novice can see is a perfect example of the type of distortions seen at the pixel level as a result of photoshopping.
Trying to prove that because you can see green in the larger gaps between letters and text only works if you ignore the Obvious and are oblivious to your own findings.
sure the green will show up in open areas but it is those ringed or haloed areas where the photoshopping reveals itself.....
What does the Mandarin Hotel in Hong Kong have to do with this discussion?
The posted article said one big nothing. That was the point of my response.
By the way, if you every get to Hong Kong, the Mandarin Hotel in Hong Kong is one of the best hotels in the entire world.
This is standard, or at least common: JPEG->BITMAP, manipulate, ->JPEG
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.