Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Facebook: When you care enough to show the very breast
InfoWorld.com ^ | January 09, 2009 | Robert X. Cringely

Posted on 01/12/2009 10:50:14 AM PST by Paleo Conservative

Facebook's ban on nursing pix is blowing up in its face -- more proof that Net censorship invariably leads to trouble. Cringe has more.

TAGS: Anti-social networking

Yet another social media site has waded into the treacherous waters of deciding what is and isn't obscene and ended up with egg on its face -- or in this case, breast milk.

Last month Facebook decided that posting photos of babies sucking happily at their mothers' bosoms were naughty, not nice, and banned them from the site. Boy was that a mistake.

Angry moms immediately formed a Facebook protest group that now boasts nearly 160,000 members. Sharon Kennedy Wynne of Tampabay.com's Whoa, Momma! blog writes:

The first five days of the year, the group was getting 10,000 new members a day. That's about the number of people who defiantly posted breastfeeding photos online that day. There was artwork of Mary nursing Jesus, of cows nursing their calves and lots of Mommas feeding their babies, Stephanie Knapp Muir, one of the organizers, told me. But she was peppered with complaints that many had their photos removed and a terse letter from Facebook warning them not to do it again or risk losing their membership to the site. Other bloggers took up the call; Google "Facebook breastfeeding" and you'll get more than 2 million hits. Now the ticked-off moms are building a mosaic of breastfeeding photos that organizers say will ultimately feature 100,000 images.

Personally, I'd rather tussle with a grizzly or a great white than with an angry mother of a newborn. And yet Facebook refuses to back down.

OK, I'll just say it, because you expect it: What total boobs those people are. If Facebook had simply asked the moms to mark these pictures as private, or limit access to adult family members, this whole controversy could have been nipped in the bud. Now thousands of ticked-off moms are nursing a grudge against the service.

And yes, I am milking this topic for jokes. (Have I missed any?)

The bigger issue of course is Net censorship. Trying to define obscenity is like trying to drive a nail through a bar of wet soap while wearing roller skates. Nobody wants Facebook to turn into a porn palace (except maybe the porn industry) but why it's picking on lactating moms is a complete mystery. If watching a suckling babe in arms gets you all warm and wiggly, you have bigger problems.

And it will very likely backfire. Instead of Facebook banning moms, they might just decide to leave the service en masse. You might even call that offering tit for tat.


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: facebook
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

1 posted on 01/12/2009 10:50:14 AM PST by Paleo Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

You know the rules...


2 posted on 01/12/2009 10:51:50 AM PST by sit-rep
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Cute title, but for shame, breastfeeding? Shouldn’t the moms be feeding thier children melamine laced powdered milk from China? Whats the big whoop, to me this is silly, breastfeeding is a natural, nonsexual part of life.


3 posted on 01/12/2009 10:52:41 AM PST by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Hooray for boobies!


4 posted on 01/12/2009 10:54:18 AM PST by pnh102 (Save America - Ban Ethanol Now!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

And the contestants are? I can’t judge without seeing some evidence!


5 posted on 01/12/2009 10:54:29 AM PST by jeffc (They're coming to take me away! Ha-ha, he-he, ho-ho!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

I’m sorry, but I don’t see why a woman would find it necessary or desirable to post a breast-feeding picture. And I appreciate Facebook’s efforts to keep it clean. While there is of course nothing unclean about breast feeding, it’s crystal obvious that you have to draw a line somewhere, and “no bare breasts” seems like a pretty intelligent place to start.

MM


6 posted on 01/12/2009 10:55:07 AM PST by MississippiMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Let them leave. Just like FR, Facebook can dictate what it will and will not allow.

They can start their own site “BreastBook” or something.


7 posted on 01/12/2009 10:55:51 AM PST by okkev68
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMan

Well, I agree there, why would a mom ever do that, my wife never would have when we had them at that age, how strange a desire?


8 posted on 01/12/2009 10:56:02 AM PST by Scythian
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

I am all for breasts but Facebook has their policy and this woman really should be smart enough to know that deliberate pictures of her breast feeding is going to cause problems. IF you want to do favor for a cause, such as breast feeding, don’t stick your breasts in others faces or try to skirt rules and guidelines. People will be more supportive. She is also welcome to start her own social network web site specifically for those who like to breast feed.


9 posted on 01/12/2009 10:56:07 AM PST by MAD-AS-HELL (How does one win over terrorists? KILL them with UNKINDNESS)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
I'm clearly old. The entire Facebook thing goes right over my head.

On the one hand, people demand their privacy. Bush is a wire-tapper, voter IDs for elections are bad, abortion is covered in the privacy clause in the Constitution, blah, blah, blah.

And on other hand, people want to publish pictures of themselves and details of their lives that are nobody's business at all. And these things seem to blow up in people's faces all the time -- and do they learn?? No. They just create new Facebook entries to complain about how their life was ruined because some ex-boyfriend saw something on their site and is now causing all kinds of trouble. Duh.

10 posted on 01/12/2009 10:56:07 AM PST by ClearCase_guy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

Facebook is used by children and adults. I think breast feeding is a great thing to do for your children. My first wife breast fed both of our children, and I was very supportive of that. I don’t think asking folks not to post pictures of it in public on facebook is a slap in anyone’s face. It’s merely the realization that kids are on there, and nudity isn’t necessary on that sight.

There are plenty of ways to post nude pictures on the internet. There are plenty of ways to develop special interest forums, where breast feeding can be heralded, advocated, and supported. I would support that effort.

These women should be more in tune with young men and the drives that they experience in their formative years. IMO, they are not using very good judgement here.


11 posted on 01/12/2009 10:58:13 AM PST by DoughtyOne (I see that Kenya's favorite son has a new weekly Saturday morning radio show.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: MississippiMan

LOL.....agreed. Breast feeding is a perfectly normal, healthy human function, but people need to be discreet about something. I doubt there are any breast feeding photo advocates who would step up to defend pics of me pinching my morning loaf, which is also a perfectly normal and healthy function (most mornings, anyways).


12 posted on 01/12/2009 10:58:17 AM PST by Joe 6-pack (Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative
Ahem. Breasts make babies happy.

p.s. Goo goo gab ba!

13 posted on 01/12/2009 10:58:28 AM PST by Zuben Elgenubi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sit-rep
Here ya go! ;-)
14 posted on 01/12/2009 10:59:08 AM PST by LuigiBasco (PALIN POWER: She's Reagan in heels, Teddy Roosevelt in a dress & like Rummy at a press conference!))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

the moms should boycott facebook (tit for tat)


15 posted on 01/12/2009 10:59:51 AM PST by yazdankurd (a)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

Isn’t this about pictures and not really against breastfeeding?


16 posted on 01/12/2009 10:59:57 AM PST by stuartcr (If the end doesn't justify the means...why have different means?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Scythian
“Cute title, but for shame, breastfeeding? Shouldn’t the moms be feeding thier children melamine laced powdered milk from China? Whats the big whoop, to me this is silly, breastfeeding is a natural, nonsexual part of life.”

I agree, but why would anyone post a picture of themselves breast feeding? I mean, why the need to put that out on the net? I saw a lady at a high school basketball game breast feeding in the stands. All I'm asking for is a blanket, I don't need to see it.

17 posted on 01/12/2009 11:00:00 AM PST by fungoking (Tis a blessing to live in the Ozarks.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: ClearCase_guy

I don’t get it either, and I am into technology.


18 posted on 01/12/2009 11:00:13 AM PST by Red in Blue PA (Guns don't kill people; abortion clinics do.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Paleo Conservative

19 posted on 01/12/2009 11:03:09 AM PST by Mad Dawgg ("`Eddies,' said Ford, `in the space-time continuum.' `Ah,' nodded Arthur, `is he? Is he?'")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Joe 6-pack
I doubt there are any breast feeding photo advocates who would step up to defend pics of me pinching my morning loaf, which is also a perfectly normal and healthy function

Here's a picture of me pinching one...


20 posted on 01/12/2009 11:03:16 AM PST by Andonius_99 (There are two sides to every issue. One is right, the other is wrong; but the middle is always evil.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-56 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson