Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 01/03/2009 7:01:24 AM PST by dascallie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: dascallie

Nothiing here. All so called conservative radio and TV talk show hosts and republican party leaders are silent on this issue.

It appears to me they are all a bunch of mindless twits.

This issue should be openly discussed and resolved in public.


107 posted on 01/03/2009 7:56:16 AM PST by stockpirate (Obama's COLB issue, Where's Rush, Sean, Laura, Mark, Ann & Malkin? Not leading!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dascallie

Until there is irrefutable evidence, at noon on 20 January we will enter a Constitutional crises. No law the dOpey-One signs will be legal.


115 posted on 01/03/2009 8:01:43 AM PST by depressed in 06 (Dope in chains, the Chicago way.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dascallie

Bullshit.


156 posted on 01/03/2009 8:34:00 AM PST by wtc911 ("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dascallie

His mother was an American citizen. I know full well that the law in operation at the time did not allow her, due to her age, the right to confer on Obama national-born citizen status if he were born outside the U.S.

Nevertheless, it is a technicality. He is the child of an American citizen and most Americans will not see the difference. And. I assure you, no Court will grant you the difference.

The Supremes have all but spoken in that the EC must determine this. They already did.

This case is closed. No way, no how does Obama get invalidated. Even if you prove to be technically correct with this argument, you will not change the facts on the ground.

The facts on the ground are this: Barack Obama is going to be the next President of the United States and no Democrat Senate will impeach him. His term in office will go to Jan 20, 2013.

Get used to this idea.

Nothing here can or will change that.


217 posted on 01/03/2009 9:24:18 AM PST by ziravan (Hiring a democrat to cut taxes is like hiring a pedophile to babysit.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dascallie
"Another clue! Which will lead to another clue, which will lead to another clue. That's all there will ever be--another clue."
219 posted on 01/03/2009 9:27:50 AM PST by Lancey Howard
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dascallie
never applied for a U.S. passport. If this is the case, then he's not even a citizen, let alone a natural born citizen.

_______________________________________________________

Never applied for a US passport?

You and any credibility you might have had are over the cliff on this.

You are saying that bambi traveled to Africa in 2007 on an Indonesian passport.

You are saying that the brouhaha about his passport records being hacked last year is fantasy.

You are lost.

230 posted on 01/03/2009 9:34:06 AM PST by wtc911 ("How you gonna get back down that hill?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dascallie

INTREP


243 posted on 01/03/2009 10:01:43 AM PST by LiteKeeper (Beware the secularization of America; the Islamization of Eurabia)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dascallie

What happened to all the stuff we were seeing a few weeks ago, here and elsewhere, about O’s mother, being a minor at the time of his birth, had to have been resident in the U. S. or its territory for a certain length of time in order for her citizenship to be automatically conferred on her child? Was that, too, just idle chatter?


248 posted on 01/03/2009 10:05:14 AM PST by Elsiejay
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dascallie

The divorced decree will be a part of the record in the WA SC case to be considered at an administrative hearing at the WA SC on Jan 8, 2009.


471 posted on 01/03/2009 2:19:09 PM PST by SeaHawkFan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dascallie

I see the troll0bots and naive children have been playing with the keyword function.

I was looking to see if I could add some as it’s sometimes difficult to go back and find things.


527 posted on 01/03/2009 3:55:34 PM PST by WestCoastGal (If we will hold the course, God in Heaven will raise up friends to help fight these battles.P Henry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dascallie
Now if Stanley Ann had "a POE document," does Ed Hale and friends know the DATE of that POE document? Hopefully, it would be from the time O was only a few days old - that would virtually guarantee that he was born abroad, whether the Kenyan BC is or is not found.

Do you know anything about how POE documents work? Is it US government document? INS (now absorbed into ICE)?

553 posted on 01/03/2009 5:39:58 PM PST by justiceseeker93
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dascallie
Bookmarked:  Saturday:  01/03/2009
588 posted on 01/03/2009 8:54:03 PM PST by Buddy B (MSgt Retired-USAF - Year: 1972)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: All

Glen Beck on Obama’s stealth ‘Global Poverty Act’

http://video.aol.com/video-detail/obamas-845-billion-secret-he-never-talks-about-this-why/3343804643


715 posted on 01/04/2009 9:16:36 PM PST by patriot08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dascallie

I haven’t gone through all the posts Burg claims to have had these divorce papers months ago:

01/02/2009: PRESS RELEASE - Philip J. Berg, Esquire Obtained the Obama 1964 Divorce File

(Contact information and PDF at end)
(Lafayette Hill, PA – 01/02/09) - Philip J. Berg, Esquire, the Attorney who filed suit against Barack H. Obama challenging Senator Obama’s lack of “qualifications” to serve as President of the United States and his case, Berg vs. Obama, [is in the U.S. Supreme Court with two (2) Conferences scheduled on 1/09/09 & 1/16/09] announced he had obtained the divorce file of Stanley Ann D. Obama vs. Barack H. Obama which was filed in the First District Court of Hawaii on January 20, 1964. The Obama divorce was finalized on March 5, 1964. Mr. Berg’s office obtained these records several months ago.

The Obama divorce records state there was one [1] child born to the parties on August 4, 1961, a son, by the name of Barack Hussein Obama, II. There is absolutely no mention of where the child was born.

For copies of all Court Pleadings, go to obamacrimes.com
____________________
Sorry if this has been posted before. I think Burg has a lot of stuff he hasn’t released.


752 posted on 01/05/2009 11:44:15 AM PST by appleseed
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dascallie

First up, the Supreme Court will conference on January 9, I believe they are considering two cases. Obama will be confirmed by the Congress on January 8, so the suits have standing.

I honestly doubt no court will take this case on. Even with four Conservative Justices and a CJ, hearing this case and discovering Obama committed the biggest scam in U.S. history would welcome a social civil war and rioting in the streets. You saw what his supporters did when he won, imagine what they’ll do if it’s discovered he isn’t eligible. The masses that voted for him probably don’t understand the legal bindings of the U.S. Constitution. Not saying they are idiots, I’m just saying, people will take to the streets. No court is willing to let that happen. This is BIGGER than Bush vs. Gore.

If there is actual proof of the POE and not just some radio discussion about it, it should be brought forward, certainly to Mr. Berg’s attention. I’m skeptical on this anyways. I do however feel that there is A LOT of covering up and funny business in the Obama family and with his associates.

People keep saying that Joe Biden would be President...this certainly would prove it’s not a Republican / Democrat conspiracy if Biden is sworn in as President...but...if it’s discovered that Barack Obama is eneligable, to the best of my understanding, every appointment he made, every law he signed, would be voided. This includes Joe Biden as Vice President and Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State (third in line)...both would be unemployeed. Fourth in line of succession would be House Speaker Nancy Pelosi. However, I WOULD imagine that President Obama would either resign or be impeached, Vice President Biden would enact the 25th Amendment and a special election would be held given, or both Obama and Biden would be gone, Pelosi would assume the role of President (making her the first female President, but not elected) and a special election held.

Either way, as much as this issue has merit, I honestly doubt it will ever turn into anything more than just millions of American’s concerned. Obama is so good that he’ll eventually produce a long-form birth certificate, it might even appear old and we’ll all be told “I told you so.” But he sure is wasting tax payers money by holding out on us.


777 posted on 01/05/2009 6:02:16 PM PST by BayAreaGOP_79 (Obama is the worst puppet the left could find.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: dascallie

Ping a ling a ling, Barry can’t be caliph or king.
He was born in British Kenya, hope we soon can say “see ya.”


841 posted on 01/08/2009 7:52:52 AM PST by HighlyOpinionated (YOU can get your own Bail Out . . .Dec 18 post at http://auntiecoosa.blogspot.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson