Such events are a big deal.
And yet no one is saying, "Barack Obama was born here."
This is an oddity that must be explained.
Posted on 12/08/2008 7:12:24 AM PST by cycle of discernment
too bad
Here’s one:
The father is listed at Frank Marshall Davis.
Remember that Hawaii did not authenticate the short-form certification posted on the Web.
Technically, I wasn’t even born in one of the states of the United States.
Oh, guys, FYI, when you make an adjective of “Congress” and “Constitution,” you use lowercase initial letters. So “constitutional requirement” and “congressional testimony.”
The better our writing, the more our audience has reason to continue hearing us out.
Some random thoughts about this whole mess:
In a way, we made the same mistake with Bill Clinton; we all knew who and what he was, revealed him before the American people, and in the end: they didn't give a damn. I'd hate to see us do the same thing again when the long-term strategy for victory is about far more mundane things: organizing, party-building, networking, issue identification, communications, fund-raising, etc.
Another thing to beware is the perception of negativity. Thanks (and really, no thanks) to Republican Party control by big-government RINO's and elitists, Conservatives were marginalized, and the message muddled until it sounded like we didn't stand for anything much different from Democrats, and nothing positive or upbeat in any event.
There was Obama out there talking up "hope" and "change" (empty phrases, true, but at least he sounded like an optimist) and all McCain could do was attack rather than articulate a vision of his (our) own. Since Reagan departed the scene, Republicans seem to have a Vision Disability, and it can't be cured with either bifocals or Beltway thinking.
We need leadership and vision and ideas, because Mr. Obama only pretends to lead, but is blinded by the glare of his own ego while lacking any ideas that don't date from the 19th century.
You, like John McCain, could very well still be a natural born citizen, though. Are you?
Ancient Chinese Secret..... ;)
That is the point, isn't it? Why wage an expensive battle over nothing?
This deceit now paves the way for other "non-natural born citizens" to run for President. Wonder what Arnold is planning?
Soon our sovereignty will mean less than the paper on which Obama's live birth was recorded.
Nice try. David Axelrod woul dbe proud of you and your platoon pushing that notion that this would be a suer overturning the election. The fact is, if Obama is not eligible, and he claims to be such a Constitutional scholar that even Clarence Thomas doe snot meet his level of competence, then it is Barack Hussein Obama, affirmative action candidate, who has in fact overtunred an election due to his fraudulent scam. Character does count, and your little squirrel has proven he has none by spending so much money and garnering so much unrest in the domestic tranquility because he refuses to prove he is eligible on Constitutional grounds. And your character is becoming somewhat questionable too
I may be wrong, but unfortunately for you, all of the courts that have touched this case agree with my position.
I don't think you are the lunatic fringe and have never implied so. I do think that many here are deeply disappointed in the Obama election and are grasping at straws in the hopes of undoing the election.
Well, I know how this may sound, but....has anyone ever explained “Building 7” ?
I think we have gotten through bad times again and ignoring a big deal like this because of what it MIGHT do to us is going to keep people asleep.
Such events are a big deal.
And yet no one is saying, "Barack Obama was born here."
This is an oddity that must be explained.
Yes, several thousand times now, actually.
Any person born in the continental United States, regardless of parentage, is a citizen. Do the words “anchor baby” mean anything to you? I don’t know where the jackass was born, but I certainly don’t want him as President, to the contrary of your silly insinuation.
Obammy is the phantom President.
There are so many gaps in this guy’s history, it’s unbelievable.
Just a I don't respond to a child's temper tantrums, I usually do not bother to respond to people who call me liar and question my character merely because they disagree with my position.
The point I was making was that Wrotnowski in his claim to the U.S. Supreme Court is arguing that the lower Courts dismissed him based on a statute that does not apply to him. The statute, however, does apply. He does not go the next step and say, even if the statute does apply to me, the lower courts were wrong to find that I did not have standing under that statute. Generally in a pleading to the Court, an attorney would say, "ABC statute does not apply to the facts in this case, but assuming for the sake of argument it does apply, then here is why I am in compliance with that statute." I don't read Wrotnowski's Supreme Court papers as making that second part of the argument.
In deciding whether to take a case, Supreme Court of the United States will only consider the arguments in the pleadings; it will not make the argument for the attorney.
That's a vivid imagination you've got.
I resisted this conspiracy theory for awhile. Then I read Obama's autobiography, and noticed more than a few discrepancies in his dates and locations. Some small; some not so small, but all missteps that most editors would catch...if the truth were available.
Leave it to Hannity to go on and on and on about something stupid.
Let me guess, it was a 45 minute rant?
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.