Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Supreme Court rejects Obama case
http://www.supremecourtus.gov/orders/courtorders/120808zor.pdf ^

Posted on 12/08/2008 7:12:24 AM PST by cycle of discernment

too bad


TOPICS: Breaking News; Front Page News; Politics/Elections; US: Hawaii
KEYWORDS: 911truth; bho; birthcertificate; blackhelicopters; certifigate; cfr; choomgang; colb; conspiracy; conspiracytheories; conspiracytheorists; conspiracytheory; deathofthewest; donofrio; lawsuit; obama; obamatransitionfile; obamatruthfile; pok; ronpaul; ruling; scotus; tinfoil; tinfoilhats; ussc
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 1,041-1,059 next last
To: andy58-in-nh
The certified copy is proof, okay?

It's not proof of anything. Even if it were real, which is highly doubtful, such documents are held by folks who weren't born in Hawaii or the US.

Is the copy that Obama made public legitimate? I don’t know.

That's the whole point. No one knows.

But a Hawaiian court has ruled that it is, whether you think that’s right or wrong.

Now you're just making stuff up.

361 posted on 12/08/2008 9:23:15 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Hey Horowitz! Just because we don't swing left doesn't mean we're "unhinged".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies]

To: NoObamaFightForConservatives

“Are you a scotus expert?”

since this morning.

scotusexpert
Since Dec 8, 2008


362 posted on 12/08/2008 9:24:43 AM PST by Grampa Dave (http://freedommarch.org/Home_Page.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 339 | View Replies]

To: LucyT
Obama worries liberals Barack Obama's Cabinet moves and policy choices are drawing fire from the left. » 'Cause for concern'

Total BS.

363 posted on 12/08/2008 9:25:45 AM PST by Dustbunny (Freedom prospers when religion is vibrant and the rule of law under God is acknowledged. The Gipper)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 335 | View Replies]

To: Grampa Dave

Fast learner.


364 posted on 12/08/2008 9:26:11 AM PST by EternalVigilance (Hey Horowitz! Just because we don't swing left doesn't mean we're "unhinged".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 362 | View Replies]

To: Sibre Fan

OK.


365 posted on 12/08/2008 9:26:31 AM PST by fatima (Free Hugs Today :))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 354 | View Replies]

To: oscars300

Obama may not have been rich, but Stanley’s parents were not poor.


366 posted on 12/08/2008 9:26:59 AM PST by autumnraine (Churchill: " we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall never surrender")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: seekthetruth; Spunky; Congressman Billybob
Thanks for the link.

[click]

[read read read] What the...

OMG! You gotta read this! (And I almost never make such a post!)

Folks, this whole issue has just gotten a LOT more interesting.
Upshot: we've been here before. This isn't the first time the USA had a non-qualified President, who historical research is showing actively suppressed disqualifying evidence while dragging around his birth certificate as a red herring.

367 posted on 12/08/2008 9:27:07 AM PST by ctdonath2 (I AM JOE THE PLUMBER!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: TribalPrincess2U

My mistake, that should have gone to whoever you responded to.


368 posted on 12/08/2008 9:27:39 AM PST by TommyDale (I) (Never forget the Republicans who voted for illegal immigrant amnesty in 2007!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 344 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Like so many with the new sign on dates.


369 posted on 12/08/2008 9:28:14 AM PST by Grampa Dave (http://freedommarch.org/Home_Page.html)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: cycle of discernment

Who even knows if the justices read FR? But if everyone who posts here would stop what they’re doing and pen a brief letter and mail it to each of the nine justices, maybe they’d know we’re not happy.


370 posted on 12/08/2008 9:29:15 AM PST by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast (Public education is a welfare program. Do you indulge?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance

Can you update us when you have a hearing date for the Keyes case? Do you have a ping list? If so please add me.

~belle~


371 posted on 12/08/2008 9:29:25 AM PST by atlbelle44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 312 | View Replies]

To: scotusexpert
Exactly. Some people here have gone beyond the rational now. And I aint jumping on the bandwagon anymore.

Care to explain what you mean by "anymore" seeing as you signed up today?

372 posted on 12/08/2008 9:29:58 AM PST by Travis T. OJustice (Change is not a destination, just as hope is not a strategy.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 329 | View Replies]

To: bronxboy

This sort of think will not work which is why talk radio won’t touch it.
::::::::::
I certainly understand your point. But beyond that, if the rule of law, especially Constitutional law, has become politically “selectable” in its application, and the American citizen no longer has the right to demand support for its Constitution, we are finished as a nation of laws.

The law cannot be optional in a society based in law. There can be no shades of gray. And if we cannot count on the highest court in the land to do its sworn job, UNBIASED and independent of politics, we are no longer a nation based in law. That was my point.


373 posted on 12/08/2008 9:30:27 AM PST by EagleUSA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 351 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

You can’t influence SCOTUS, they pride themselves on being above the political fray.


374 posted on 12/08/2008 9:31:30 AM PST by bronxboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 370 | View Replies]

To: TommyDale

That’s quite alright.

I’m completely calm now.


375 posted on 12/08/2008 9:31:31 AM PST by TribalPrincess2U (Dirty Dems at their best is always the worse.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 368 | View Replies]

To: andy58-in-nh
But a Hawaiian court has ruled that it is, whether you think that’s right or wrong

Really? When in the hell did that happen? When did a Hawaiian court rule on anything regarding this issue?

376 posted on 12/08/2008 9:31:52 AM PST by autumnraine (Churchill: " we shall fight in the fields and in the streets, we shall never surrender")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 347 | View Replies]

To: antceecee

Yes. And several cases, not all, listed under that section, ‘Cases Pending’, give direction as to what the petitioner can do relating to a portion of their case. Donofrio’s ‘Petition for Writ of Certiorari’ was not denied. Look below under ‘Certiorari Denied’. Donofrio is not listed. It looks to me like they denied a portion of the relief he requested. The stay he asked for concerning the SOS giving the electoral votes to BO was denied. The Writ, the re-examination of the lower court ruling was not denied.


377 posted on 12/08/2008 9:32:22 AM PST by ethical
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 175 | View Replies]

To: Jersey Republican Biker Chick

I believe that the Obama non-citizenship case from California and Alan Keyes has much more meat on it. Keyes was actually one of the candidates. It is supposed to be filed with SCOTUS today.

http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244


378 posted on 12/08/2008 9:32:27 AM PST by real_patriotic_american
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: EternalVigilance
"Fast learner."

Holiday Inn Express has been doing great business lately.

379 posted on 12/08/2008 9:33:09 AM PST by verity ("Lord, what fools we mortals be!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 364 | View Replies]

To: jveritas

Thank you for your civil reply. Not that I expected any less from you.

This man has shrouded his past deliberately, two hagiographic books by him notwithstanding.

This should have been a SIMPLE matter to resolve. Release the necessary documentation and it is over and done with.

People are treating this as if the burden of proof is on all of US as American citizens to prove he is NOT a citizen, when in actuality, the burden of proof his on HIM to show he is eligible for office as described in the Constitution.

It is the job of the GOVERNMENT to assess the legitimacy of citizenship. Our government failed us in this.


380 posted on 12/08/2008 9:33:41 AM PST by rlmorel ("A barrel of monkeys is not fun. In fact, a barrel of monkeys can be quite terrifying!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 224 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 341-360361-380381-400 ... 1,041-1,059 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson