Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Can you imagine the HOWLS if...
vanity | 22NOV08 | mapmaker77

Posted on 11/22/2008 6:37:32 AM PST by mapmaker77

It would be a spectacle for the ages. The date is 15 Jan 09 and the case of zeros' real birth certificate is before the SCOTUS. The teams are set and in place. On the left we see a legal dream team led by the distinguished, (and righteously non-partisan), legal scholar Patrick Leahy. And on the right, arrayed against the salvation of mankind, sit several constitutional experts that the msm types have never seen on Meet the Press, (and are fanatically partisan by default). Let the battle begin!


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: bho2008; birthcertificate; certifigate; marines; zero; zot
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last
To: mapmaker77
Oops, and that's only if the Supreme Court declares Obama ineligible.
21 posted on 11/22/2008 6:56:31 AM PST by 1rudeboy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: mapmaker77
The lead attorney for the left is none other than the infamous Johnny Cochran who has been Resurrected (!) to once again come to the defense of the oppressed. His opening argument is, of course, if it doesn't fit you must acquit.

Incorrect.

Johnny Cochran uses the Wookie Defense.

"Why would a Wookiee, an eight-foot tall Wookiee, want to live on Endor, with a bunch of two-foot tall Ewoks? That does not make sense! But more important, you have to ask yourself: What does this have to do with this case? Nothing. Ladies and gentlemen, it has nothing to do with this case! It does not make sense! Look at me. I'm a lawyer defending a major record company, and I'm talkin' about Chewbacca! Does that make sense? Ladies and gentlemen, I am not making any sense! None of this makes sense! And so you have to remember, when you're in that jury room deliberatin' and conjugatin' the Emancipation Proclamation, [approaches and softens] does it make sense? No! Ladies and gentlemen of this supposed jury, it does not make sense! If Chewbacca lives on Endor, you must acquit! The defense rests."

22 posted on 11/22/2008 6:57:17 AM PST by Lazamataz (Proud author of abstract semi-religious dogmatic hoooey with a decidedly fring feel.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red_Devil 232

Not really; the election can be ruled illegal anytime. If it was illegal, it was illegal, regardless of when it’s determined that it was illegal. Even if it’s after January 20, it’s not too late. He’d simply not be the POTUS because the election was declared illegal. It’s against the law to run unqualified candidates; it’s against the law to swear in unqualified candidates; it’s against the law for electors to vote for unqualified candidates — the law in all these cases being the Constitution itself.


23 posted on 11/22/2008 6:57:19 AM PST by Technical Editor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Technical Editor
Donofrio’s case is going to be talked about by SCOTUS in a conference on December 5.

I knew that at least one challenge had been filed in a court.I didn't know it had gotten nearly that far though.I'll bet the SCOTUS punts on this issue.Too hot.*Far* too hot.

24 posted on 11/22/2008 6:57:20 AM PST by Gay State Conservative (Obama:"Ich bin ein beginner")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Philo1962

Who takes over if Obama is not sworn in? Hillary? She already has all of her people in the cabinet.


25 posted on 11/22/2008 6:58:04 AM PST by Boardwalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: FrankR

Things like is the certificate real or fake, does it signify birth in Hawaii, where was he born? All questions of fact.


26 posted on 11/22/2008 7:02:09 AM PST by Mr. Blonde (You ever thought about being weird for a living?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: FrankR
Please give us some examples of those "questions of fact".

Place of birth, validity of records, testimony of witnesses. Now give me the question of law.

27 posted on 11/22/2008 7:03:26 AM PST by Mojave (http://laissez-fairerepublic.com/)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: sneakers

From an an article on that thread:

“Obama on Justice Clarence Thomas (August 2008):

“I would not have nominated Clarence Thomas,” said the presumptive Democratic nominee. “I don’t think that he...” the crowd interrupted with applause. “I don’t think that he was a strong enough jurist or legal thinker at the time for that elevation. Setting aside the fact that I profoundly disagree with his interpretations of a lot of the constitution.””

I find the fact that Justice Thomas has called the conference...extremely satisfying.


28 posted on 11/22/2008 7:04:18 AM PST by SumProVita (Cogito, ergo...Sum Pro Vita. (Modified DeCartes))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: SumProVita

What goes around comes around Obama! You betcha The One profoundly disagrees with intrpretations of a lot of the constitution. Some of his best arguments were “Present.”


29 posted on 11/22/2008 7:06:14 AM PST by Boardwalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: Boardwalk

That’s a complicated question. If Obama is found out as a person ineligible to serve as president, it depends on when he’s found out. If it’s before the Electors pick him as the president, the Democratic Party picks a new person and it could very well be Hillary. If it’s after the inauguration, then he resigns and Biden is the new president.

If it happens between the Electoral College and inauguration day, I’m stumped. My guess is that it would still be a decision by the DNC.


30 posted on 11/22/2008 7:09:08 AM PST by Philo1962 (Iraq is terrorist flypaper. They go there to die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Philo1962

All the Presidents men are in line (Bill Clinton’s men) and I can’t help but think that Hillary is just sitting there like the black widow spider ready to eat Obama for breakfast and take over the world.


31 posted on 11/22/2008 7:12:17 AM PST by Boardwalk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Blonde; Mojave
Based on the premise of the original post, which sumises at some future point that the Supremes have found the document to be false and Obama to be a non-citizens, your questions of fact based on the (so far) fictional event would be totally moot. All those things would be known by that point, or, there wouldn't be any Supremes ruling.

If he was - in fact - found to have been born in Hawaii...the whole argument will be moot, and everyone will shut up and go home.

However, if the certificate is found to be fake, and ruled as such by the Supremes, then there would not only be eligibility questions, there would also be questions of fraud and criminal intent to be investigated.

But, so far, this is all based on conjecture and a speculated event, so neither my arguments nor yours are worth debating.
32 posted on 11/22/2008 7:16:36 AM PST by FrankR (Where's Waldo ([W]here [A]re [L]egal [D]ocuments [O]bama? (i.e. birth certificate))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: Technical Editor
Technical, technically you are right but the date of Dec. 15, 08 has a very important event associated with it - the meeting of the Electoral College to cast their votes. It would be most advantageous to have the scenario happen then or even before the joint session of Congress on Jan. 8, 09 rather than eleven months into an entrenched Obama Administration.
33 posted on 11/22/2008 7:17:27 AM PST by Red_Devil 232 (VietVet - USMC All Ready On The Right? All Ready On The Left? All Ready On The Firing Line!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: Philo1962

“... the Democratic Party picks a new person and it could very well be Hillary.”

I’m confused on this point. Even if this happens, at any time, the Dems did run a candidate eligible for the presidency: Biden.


34 posted on 11/22/2008 7:28:38 AM PST by Enosh (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: mapmaker77

If by chance Obama is found ineligible to be president...how would that affect Joe Biden...the choice for VP would have been made by someone unqualified to make the decision...so how could he possibly take the place of president? Just wondering...


35 posted on 11/22/2008 7:33:53 AM PST by leenie312 (learly and effectively)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Enosh

But Biden was elected as VP, not as president.


36 posted on 11/22/2008 7:34:26 AM PST by Philo1962 (Iraq is terrorist flypaper. They go there to die.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: mapmaker77
SCOTUS will accept the case if some of the evidence rumored to exist really does exist—my take. They have to because if he's illegal, every action taken be him can be litigated—there would be no Presidential Shield from litigation. The internet rumors need to be verified.

Is there a utube of his paternal grandmother saying that she was present at his birth in Keyna?

Is there a Keyna birth certificate?

Interestingly enough the ONE would get away free if he's found ineligible under “The My Mommie Did It” defense

37 posted on 11/22/2008 7:34:59 AM PST by chuckl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red_Devil 232

On the surface, I’d rather have Biden than Hillary. He’s an affable bumbler and doesn’t have the same mafia-like political machine behind him. If we’re going to have a dem in the high office, I’d rather have one who risks making a fool of himself with every breath-someone that will embarrass the dems-than a hardened socialist whose every ambition has been the Presidency.


38 posted on 11/22/2008 7:35:57 AM PST by Lil'freeper (I know... I just like slapping you. [[19819]])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: Philo1962

Right, but it seems to me Biden’s claim would trump all others. I don’t see how the question could fall to the DNC, allowing them to simply pick someone with no general election whatsoever.


39 posted on 11/22/2008 7:43:01 AM PST by Enosh (†)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Gay State Conservative
Two cases at the SCOTUS> Docket numbers 08A407 and 08-4340. > Berg vs. Obama et al ( see Obamacrimes.com for details) and Donofrio’s case.

Berg sues:Obama, DNC, Howard Dean, FEC (Reply due Dec 1st)
DOnofrio sues:SOS of NJ (scheduled for Conference Dec 5th)

Happy Holidays!

40 posted on 11/22/2008 7:47:04 AM PST by hoosiermama (Berg is a liberal democrat. Keyes is a conservative. Obama is bringing us together already!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-112 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson