Posted on 11/21/2008 4:32:05 PM PST by Upstate NY Guy
WASHINGTON, D.C. – On Wednesday, Nov. 19, U.S. Supreme Court Justice Clarence Thomas distributed Leo C. Denofrio’s renewed application for a stay of the election for conference on Dec. 5.
His first application was denied by Justice David Souter on Nov. 6. However, rules of the court allow for the renewed submission to a justice of choice.
Beginning in October, Denofrio made his way up through the ranks of the courts until his constitutional question as to the meaning of “natural born citizen” reached the Supreme Court.
He submitted an application for an emergency stay to prohibit the use of what he called “defective ballots” in the state of New Jersey because they contained ineligible candidates for the office of President of the United States, and asked that the court order New Jersey Secretary of State (SOS) Nina Mitchell Wells to remove the names of Republican candidate John McCain, Democratic candidate Barack Obama and Socialist Workers Party candidate Roger Calero from New Jersey ballots.
According to Denofrio, the three candidates are not “natural born citizens,” as required by the Constitution to hold the office of President of the United States...
New Jersey statute requires Wells to make a“statement” wherein she certifies, under her hand and official seal of office, the names … “of all such candidates for whom the voters within such county may be by law entitled to vote at such election.”...
If the SOS doesn’t protect the citizens of New Jersey, Denofrio states it is then up to the citizens to command Wells to do so.
As a result of Wells’ “misfeasance,” Denofrio says the state’s ballots contain the names of three presidential candidates who are not, “by law entitled,” to hold the office of President of the United States.
(Excerpt) Read more at sonorannews.com ...
>>>Where they exhumed an 84 year old phermaldahyde filled corpse, put a D next to his name and he won the Senate seat.
::chokes!::
ROFL!!!!
Look at it this way. If his case has merit, it would invalidate the corpses election too. The ballots were defective; therefore the election was too.
Ahhh, the irony of life coming full circle.
I’m remeinded of something I heard a long time ago - paraphrased -
Be kind to the people you meet on the way up, because you will meet them again on the way down...
This is a very significant move by Justice Thomas.
http://www.rallycongress.com/constitutional-qualification/1244
5.56mm
Anybody can petition for cert and, it goes to “conference” automatically. Contrary to popular belief, it does not involve the justices sitting around and deciding which cases to take. This petition will never be read by anyone but a clerk.
There are upwards of 7000 petitions for cert each year. About 100 of them are granted.
These lawyers are running the long con imo and making a living hosing people desperate to believe.
Much luck the fraudsters rats in 04.
The scales are used as a symbol of justice for a reason :)
You will have to ask LucyT to put you on the COLB Ping List.
I lack standing?
I’ll have you know that I used to watch Judge Wapner in action. I’m an expert.
Also, it’s suspected that one of the judges may be sabotaging the case.
will have to listen to find out. They suspect something wrong.
Leo states: “We’re five people away from not having Obama as president”
Leo talking about “judicial misconduct” by a Judge Sabatino (via his clerk) who was trying to get Leo to file pleadings that Judge Sabatino tried to make him file. Essentially the Judge was trying to get Leo to file an inferior suit that could easily be knocked down.
(I don’t understand some of this legal stuff that Leo’s discussing - sorry)
This is getting interesting.
This Judge Sabatino(Sabatage) sounds “Evil”.
Leo is spitting mad at what they Sabatino - the appelate court judge tried to do to..”tried to trip the case up”.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.