Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

CA: State high court throwing out Prop. 8 sure to lead to recall effort
San Diego Tribune ^ | 11/11/2208 | Chris Reed

Posted on 11/11/2008 6:22:29 PM PST by Ol' Sparky

The California Supreme Court's surprising announcement that it will quickly review the legality of Proposition 8, banning gay marriage, has prompted growing speculation that the four judges who found a right to gay marriage in the state Constitution in a May ruling will quickly throw Prop. 8 out. If that happens, watch out for a "barn-burner of an election -- the biggest thing this state has ever seen," says recall election guru Ted Costa.

Costa says he's already been contacted by some of the folks who would seek to recall Ronald George, Joyce Kennard, Kathryn Werdegar and Carlos Moreno if Prop. 8 is scrapped. He thinks it's premature and risky because talk of a recall "would just (bleep) off the judges."

Costa also doesn't sound like he's too thrilled about such a recall, saying it wouldn't be "healthy." Citing all the financial turmoil in California, he said, "If someone's going to do some recalling, that should be the focus."

But Costa sounds certain such a recall would happen and agreed that it would be no problem at all for gay marriage opponents to quickly gather the signatures of 12 percent of the electorate to force a recall election targeting George, Kennard, Werdegar and Moreno. He said supporters of Prop. 8 such as the Knights of Columbus, the Mormon Church and other traditional religious groups all had "massive" resources to bring to bear.

He doesn't think the state Supreme Court will overturn Prop. 8. "I gotta believe they'll uphold the initiative process." But if the four justices do, Costa says expect an amazing spectacle.

I agree. I think literally hundreds of millions of dollars would be spent on the recall. Gay marriage opponents see Prop. 8 as akin to a last stand preventing a global movement toward acceptance of gay marriage and will go all out. Gay marriage supporters, for their part, will no longer accept incremental progress or "civil unions."

At least it would be good for the California economy.


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events; US: California
KEYWORDS: abuseofpower; california; caljudges; calsupremecourt; gaybrownshirts; gayfascists; gaymarriage; homosexualagenda; judicalfascism; judicaltyranny; judicialactivism; judiciary; militanthomosexuals; prop8; recall; scoc; tyranny
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last

1 posted on 11/11/2008 6:22:29 PM PST by Ol' Sparky
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

http://www.thearticlesofimpeachment.com/


2 posted on 11/11/2008 6:23:26 PM PST by The Spirit Of Allegiance (Public Employees: Honor Your Oaths! Defend the Constitution from Enemies--Foreign and Domestic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

Well, this will certainly spark a revolt. The will of the people overturned by a couple of guys in black dresses. I think it’s time to remove these people by force


3 posted on 11/11/2008 6:24:43 PM PST by realcleanguy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

NOW THAT will be a sight and spectacle to behold!


4 posted on 11/11/2008 6:25:58 PM PST by Outlaw Woman (Those with the most to Lose, did the least to prevent it's happening. Ronald Reagan 10/27/64)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #5 Removed by Moderator

To: realcleanguy

I think it’s time to remove these people by force

Amen!


6 posted on 11/11/2008 6:26:47 PM PST by Outlaw Woman (Those with the most to Lose, did the least to prevent it's happening. Ronald Reagan 10/27/64)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky
I'm waiting for the homos to protest in black neighborhoods and churches. Now that would be entertainment!
7 posted on 11/11/2008 6:27:19 PM PST by randog (What the...?!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

I was telling friend of mine if Cali supreme court does that

Okay I am aiming for recall of all those bozos we can in this state


8 posted on 11/11/2008 6:30:12 PM PST by SevenofNine ("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky; JustAmy; mtngrl@vrwc; gracie1; Mama_Bear; jkphoto; notpoliticallycorewrecked; ...

recall ping


9 posted on 11/11/2008 6:30:25 PM PST by Jim Robinson (We ARE the dissent, baby!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky
"Costa says he's already been contacted by some of the folks who would seek to recall Ronald George, Joyce Kennard, Kathryn Werdegar and Carlos Moreno if Prop. 8 is scrapped. He thinks it's premature and risky because talk of a recall "would just (bleep) off the judges.""

???????????????????????????????????????????

10 posted on 11/11/2008 6:30:35 PM PST by Psycho_Bunny (By Obama's own reckoning, isn't Lyndon LaRouche more qualified? He's run since the 70's)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

So then they declare the recall unconstitutional, null and void.

Then what?


11 posted on 11/11/2008 6:30:40 PM PST by Chet 99
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

On what basis can they throw 8 out?

It already went to court before the election and the anti-8 people were denied and the vote went ahead.

It can’t be called state unconstitutional again because 8 is an amendment to the constitution. The only thing left is claiming its unconstitutional under the federal constitution. If they do that then it goes immediately to the SCOTUS. If the SCOTUS finds that banning gay marriage is unconstitutional then all state bans across the country are thrown out.

This is going to be interesting.


12 posted on 11/11/2008 6:33:04 PM PST by HerrBlucher
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SevenofNine

California is getting interesting. A bunch of hard left crap was on the ballot in San Fran and they all lost. Apparently there are more conservatives in SF then people realized. The hard core libs are often renters.

Some people think CA could be flipped to where a GOP Pres could compete but RINO Arnold is not going to do it.


13 posted on 11/11/2008 6:33:15 PM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky

“Judicial fascism” has got to go.


14 posted on 11/11/2008 6:33:46 PM PST by FlingWingFlyer (I voted for McCain/Palin so I can look my grandchildren in the eyes when I tell them I'm sorry.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99

That’d make for an interesting standoff. In the old days, it’d be time for tar and feathers. We’re more civilized now, but I’m afraid a constitutional crisis is the only thing that will get their attention.


15 posted on 11/11/2008 6:36:05 PM PST by Jim Robinson (We ARE the dissent, baby!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie

Arnold said that he may ignore the will of people on this

I think we need recall that dude maybe Double recall the Suprmes and Arnold


16 posted on 11/11/2008 6:36:20 PM PST by SevenofNine ("We are Freepers, all your media belong to us, resistence is futile")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky
They won't overturn Proposition 8 because they remember what happened to Rose Bird. If the Justices are perceived as putting ideology ahead of the law, they could be out of office in no time.

"Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached." - Manuel II Palelologus

17 posted on 11/11/2008 6:37:13 PM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Outlaw Woman
I think it’s time to remove these people by force

That may be necessary if we want to remain in a free country. If anyone objects to that thought, they ought to keep in mind it is these judges that are the outlaws and ones exceeding their authority.

18 posted on 11/11/2008 6:37:29 PM PST by Ol' Sparky (Liberal Republicans are the greater of two evils)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: HerrBlucher
It can’t be called state unconstitutional again because 8 is an amendment to the constitution. The only thing left is claiming its unconstitutional under the federal constitution. If they do that then it goes immediately to the SCOTUS. If the SCOTUS finds that banning gay marriage is unconstitutional then all state bans across the country are thrown out.

Which makes it all the more interesting that the staties are pushing it through fast, as the SCOTUS still hasn't yet been 0bamafied.

19 posted on 11/11/2008 6:38:06 PM PST by Gondring (Paul Revere would have been flamed as a naysayer troll and told to go back to Boston.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Ol' Sparky
The California Supreme Court's surprising announcement that it will quickly review the legality of Proposition 8, banning gay marriage, has prompted growing speculation that the four judges who found a right to gay marriage in the state Constitution in a May ruling will quickly throw Prop. 8 out.

The ballet initiative already has been reviewed by the courts has it not? The proposed amendment to the Constitution was approved by the people. On what basis can they trash the legality of Proposition 8? Has it not already been vetted? The eager legal beavers already threw out Prop 22; telling the people that they had to get an amendment to the Constitution. The people have the amendment; now they are going to throw that out too?

What kind of doubletalk are the judges giving now? Is this a "Mother, May I" kind of thing, so the people of California have to go back to the end of the line, and start over for the third time?

20 posted on 11/11/2008 6:38:59 PM PST by olezip
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-160 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson