Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NJ VOTER VS. OBAMA ON "NATURAL BORN STATUS" NOW PENDING US SUPREME COURT
DEMOCRATIC-DISASTER.COM ^ | 11-10-2008

Posted on 11/10/2008 8:27:51 PM PST by virgin

NEW JERSEY VOTER VS. OBAMA AND McCAIN ON "NATURAL BORN CITIZEN" STATUS NOW BEFORE US SUPREME COURT - DONOFRIO v. WELLS - STANDING NOT CHALLENGED IN LOWER COURTS - OBAMA BIRTH CERTIFICATE NOT MAIN ISSUE

(Excerpt) Read more at democratic-disaster.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Government; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: bc; bho2008; birthcertificate; certifigate; colb; legalmombojumbo; makeitstop; obama; obamatransitionfile; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 401-408 next last
To: Lmo56

Not only advocated it, worked arduously to protect it! On four separate occasions he argued for the cancellation of the rights of those born alive infants in order to protect a most heinous form of killing the alive unborn by forcing them to be born prematurely so they struggle and eventually die of suffocation and exposure by medical attention being withheld purposely by the murdering abortionist. I have been trying to track down the fetal tissue industry connections ot Illinois abortion ‘clinics’ especially in Southside of Chicago where predominantly black children are slaughtered by the abortionists.


241 posted on 11/11/2008 10:39:27 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]

To: JMack

“If he doesn’t have a BC this is a mess unlike anything imaginable.” Like the thuggish criminal cousin Obama worked to get elected in Kenya, Raila Odinga, Barack Obama is counting on the threat of major violence to extort the process and allow him to avoid proving he’s qualified, Constitutionally. Why else would he be fighting tooth and nail to avoid his documents being exposed? And what does that tell us about this filthy Marxist squirrel that he would push this to the limits knowing that extreme violence will be in the offing if he doesn’t get a pass? Bastard doesn’t give a damn about black people —it is their neighborhoods where the rioting will do the greatest destruction— or MY CONSTITUTION!


242 posted on 11/11/2008 10:43:48 PM PST by MHGinTN (Believing they cannot be deceived, they cannot be convinced when they are deceived.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 239 | View Replies]

To: Publius

If it gets to the point where successful challenges against Obama are made during the Congressional count, you can bet there will also be successful challenges against Panamanian-born McCain. That would mean the House makes no decision on Pres and it passes to Biden.

MAYBE a McCain elector will be smart enough to vote Palin for President on Dec. 15. Maybe a Democrat elector will vote for someone besides Obama. Even then, Palin (or Nader or Hillary etc) would only become President IF the House delegations of 26 states vote that way. Otherwise, it’s Biden.


243 posted on 11/12/2008 1:15:56 AM PST by Plummz (pro-constitution, anti-corruption)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: txflake; Publius; April Lexington; Congressman Billybob
Well, would any 0bama contributor be able to show monetary damages? After all, the average American citizen who chose to donate their hard-earned money to someone who was not Constitutionally eligible certainly would have suffered damages. And if one contributor would do, would a class of them be better?

As far as a member of Congress being the one to show standing, I believe Joe Lieberman would demonstrate integrity here. And since he caucuses with the Democrats, with the exception of defense, there would seem to be little personal gain he would draw from this.

244 posted on 11/12/2008 1:20:01 AM PST by bootless (Never Forget. Never Again. And NEVER GIVE UP!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: Publius

Good analysis except I don’t see in the Constitution
any provision that the Vice President Elect shall be
deemed to have qualified in the event no President
Elect shall have qualified. The relevant section is
the 20th Amendment. It says that the Vice President
Elect shall act as President until a President shall
have qualified.


245 posted on 11/12/2008 4:53:42 AM PST by cycjec
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 202 | View Replies]

To: bootless

IMO, his candidacy affected all the campaigns (RNC/DNC/Even the Primaries). Not just Obama contributors.


246 posted on 11/12/2008 4:55:17 AM PST by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: Plummz

I’m curious, wouldn’t we need new electors too if the President elects are deemed not qualified?


247 posted on 11/12/2008 4:57:12 AM PST by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: Tired of Taxes
“If Justice Thomas denies it, I wonder how many people here will accept it or turn against him. If he doesn’t, I’m sure the Dems and the MSM will demonize him even further.”

I certainly hope no one here would turn against Justice Thomas if he were to deny the case for some reason. I am sure he would clearly state the reason and would follow the rule of law.

If he rules that Obama must provide the documents to satisfy Constitutional requirements the DEMS and MSM would be upset, but have no basis for arguement. But then, they probably would have no problem saying the Constitution doesn't matter!

248 posted on 11/12/2008 5:29:33 AM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 237 | View Replies]

To: Scythian

Is that a Panzer and a Sherman? I’d be afraid that they’d spontaneously start fighting and take out the gingerbread house.


249 posted on 11/12/2008 5:48:38 AM PST by Malsua
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 206 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie; All
Supreme Court .. Clerk's Office: 202-479-3011
250 posted on 11/12/2008 6:34:24 AM PST by tomkat ( . . shrugging . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: wbill; conservativegramma; All
Lame duck or no, the pØs would still have the football.

Color me worried.

251 posted on 11/12/2008 6:43:34 AM PST by tomkat ( . . shrugging . .)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 156 | View Replies]

To: virgin

I read last night that Leo’s case has supposedly gotten to Justice Thomas and copies will go to all the Justices. Can anyone confirm that?

We need to get the word out. Savage or somebody needs to get Leo on their show.

Supposedly Leo’s case may be stronger than Berg’s case. The NJ Sec of State or top elections person told Leo twice they never checked any candidates and just assumed they were eligble (citizenship).

Leo’s case is really with NJ. From what I can tell if he can prove Obama was not checked by NJ and O has to provide proof then his votes for NJ could be disqualified. If this happens - other lawsuits could be filed nationwide to disqualify other states. I think this is how it could play out.


252 posted on 11/12/2008 7:38:36 AM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Frantzie; Smokeyblue; Lmo56
“I read last night that Leo’s case has supposedly gotten to Justice Thomas and copies will go to all the Justices. Can anyone confirm that? Supposedly Leo’s case may be stronger than Berg’s case. The NJ Sec of State or top elections person told Leo twice they never checked any candidates and just assumed they were eligible (citizenship). Leo’s case is really with NJ. From what I can tell if he can prove Obama was not checked by NJ and O has to provide proof then his votes for NJ could be disqualified. If this happens - other lawsuits could be filed nationwide to disqualify other states. I think this is how it could play out.”

I have not heard anything more about Leo's case than that Justice Thomas was SUPOSED to receive it along with copies to every Justice. I hope that does happen and that a decision will be made soon.

I find it unreal that every Sec.Of State is not required to verify a candidates constitutional qualifications before placing their names on the ballot. Each candidate must produce so many signed petitions from voters in order to have their name placed on the ballot. Those petitions from voters are checked thoroughly for validity to make sure each person is a US citizen and a registered voter. One would think the candidate would have to prove to the Sec.of State that he/she qualifies AS A US CITIZEN in order to represent those voters!

253 posted on 11/12/2008 8:46:00 AM PST by seekthetruth
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 252 | View Replies]

To: Plummz

It has been settled U.S. law since like 1905 that any child born to two (2) United States citizens on any U.S. territory, protectorate, or military base IS indeed a U.S. citizen.

Thats why Barry S. Goldwater could run for POTUS in 1964, he was born in AZ when it was still a U.S. territory.


254 posted on 11/12/2008 9:25:42 AM PST by Lmo56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 243 | View Replies]

To: Calpernia

When we voted on 11/4, we voted for slates of Electoral voters in each State.

There are at least 538 + 538 = 1076 possible voters (counting only DEM and GOP).

Currently, Obama has something like a 350-188 edge.

Presumably, if Obama is DQ’d, his Electors would be DQ’d.

Then, McCain’s Electors would replace Obama’s DQ’d Electors.

Therefore, there would STILL be 538 Electors, but they would ALL be McCain’s (350 new + 188 old = 538).

And, presumably, they wouls ALL vote for McCain. Thus, a 538-0 tally.


255 posted on 11/12/2008 9:33:11 AM PST by Lmo56
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 247 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56

Thank you and bump....

I’m beginning to feel some HOPE.


256 posted on 11/12/2008 9:37:21 AM PST by txhurl (somebody just bought 12 Carrier Battle Groups for 600 million dollars)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: concerned about politics

Would it be like sports? Would his term be forfeited and we pretend it never happened?


257 posted on 11/12/2008 9:37:48 AM PST by Terry Mross ( It's just a matter of time before we're all 'GUILTY' of hate speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 38 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56

I suppose that could happen, IF the USSC rules 0 is not qualified, and they rule before 12/15/08 (the Monday after the second Wednesday in December).

Asuming the USSC rules that 0 is not qualified, if they rule AFTER the EC vote, but before 1/20/09, then Biden would become the Acting President-elect, then Acting President. If they rule after 1/20/09, I have no clue what would happen.


258 posted on 11/12/2008 9:45:06 AM PST by savedbygrace (SECURE THE BORDERS FIRST (I'M YELLING ON PURPOSE))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]

To: Congressman Billybob

Someone mentioned that if O was bounced by SCOTUS and replaced due to his fraud, the S&P would drop 20%. I disagree, the markets would rally.

Small, medium and big business have no confidence at all in O. People are getting laid off because a weaker economy but ever more so because of O. I know at least 8 business owners with employees from 10 to 100 who would have kept people on if McCain won.

I think the country hangs on Leo or Berg’s cases. O, his backers and Howard Dean caused this fraud.


259 posted on 11/12/2008 9:50:45 AM PST by Frantzie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 211 | View Replies]

To: Lmo56

Another question then if you don’t mind.

This Donofrio case is bi partisan. It includes McCain. And the fact that 8 states listed Roger Calero ( http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2130641/posts?page=114#114 ) gives it merit. This i filed against NJ Sec. Nina Wells. What if McCain is also removed? What do you think happens then?


260 posted on 11/12/2008 9:57:56 AM PST by Calpernia (Hunters Rangers - Raising the Bar of Integrity http://www.barofintegrity.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 255 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 221-240241-260261-280 ... 401-408 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson