Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rush Limbaugh: Time to cleanse Republican Party
World Net Daily ^ | 11/5/08

Posted on 11/05/2008 1:23:02 PM PST by truthandlife

Radio host Rush Limbaugh, the loudest conservative voice in American politics , today blasted John McCain's presidential campaign as weak and said Barack Obama's election as president is an opportunity to purge the Republican Party of candidates who abandon conservative principles.

"McCain's whole campaign was a concession speech," said Limbaugh in his post-election analysis. "We've now demonstrated to everyone how to lose."

Limbaugh dismissed any notion that victories by Democrats in the White House and Congress meant a repudiation of right-leaning principles.

Limbaugh explained conservatism was not on the ballot.

"We haven't been on the ballot since 1994," he said, noting that if Republicans wanted to win elections, they should not put so-called "moderates" on the ballot.

"The conservative movement does not need to be rebuilt," he said. "We had some people abandon the conservative movement, and they need to be abandoned."

The broadcaster called last night's results "an opportunity for cleansing ... like we haven't seen in a long time."

(Excerpt) Read more at worldnetdaily.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News
KEYWORDS: bho2008; conservatism; conservatives; limbaugh; rats; rino; rinopurge; rinos; talkradio
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-270 next last
To: marron

“The war of ideas is fought on three battlefields:

#1. The schools and universities.
#2. The news media.
#3. The entertainment media.

We’ve abdicated all three and the results are here for all to see. We’ve got to take them back, or build our own, or expect to see ourselves marginalized and pushed to the sidelines until there is nothing left to save.”

Bingo.


241 posted on 11/06/2008 4:45:27 AM PST by villagerjoel ("Tyranny sincerely exercised for the good of its victims may be the most oppressive." CS Lewis)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: marron

Focusing item #1 would go a LONG WAY toward resolving items #2 and #3.


242 posted on 11/06/2008 4:47:26 AM PST by who knows what evil? (G-d saved more animals than people on the ark...www.siameserescue.org.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: philsfan24

You must not listen to Rush very much

‘Free pass’...what are you smoking?

And you can stfu too.


243 posted on 11/06/2008 4:50:22 AM PST by PjhCPA (stop flapping your gums and DO SOMETHING)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Cyclone59
McCain ran about as bad a campaign has I've seen since Bush 1992--even Dole's lackluster campaign was better. Having nobody to run at the top of the ticket sure helped the Michigan Republicans retain their seats with Day-after-day of Obama's castigation of Bush policies synchronized with Mark Schauer's commercials. McCain was correct in insisting that we not label our adversary a "terrorists" or a "traitors", but his reflex of compromise was incompetence of the worst kind.
244 posted on 11/06/2008 4:51:22 AM PST by tralfazwasused? (The real Tralfaz)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cyclone59
If any candidate doesn’t meet ALL standard of a republican then they are rejected and not even considered.

Um, what's the point of even having a party if we are supposed to end up nominating/electing individuals who are opposed to the party's stated ideology and platform? For the GOP to push non-conservative people for President is like Planned Parenthood/NARAL picking a pro-lifer to be their chairman -- except THEY aren't stupid enough to do that.

Until that attitude changes we are in for a long miserable ride. My case in point, McCain was not supported in the same way that obama was by his party.

McCain didn't deserve support. He's an aggressive enemy of the U.S. Constitution.

245 posted on 11/06/2008 4:55:59 AM PST by Sloth (What's the difference between taxation and armed robbery, aside from who's doing it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Cyclone59
If any candidate doesn’t meet ALL standard of a republican then they are rejected and not even considered.

Um, what's the point of even having a party if we are supposed to end up nominating/electing individuals who are opposed to the party's stated ideology and platform? For the GOP to push non-conservative people for President is like Planned Parenthood/NARAL picking a pro-lifer to be their chairman -- except THEY aren't stupid enough to do that.

Until that attitude changes we are in for a long miserable ride. My case in point, McCain was not supported in the same way that obama was by his party.

McCain didn't deserve support. He's an aggressive enemy of the U.S. Constitution.

246 posted on 11/06/2008 4:56:18 AM PST by Sloth (What's the difference between taxation and armed robbery, aside from who's doing it?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Hot Tabasco

McCain wasn’t my first choice, by a long shot. What I was trying to say was that, some of us got behind our team when the going got rough. IMO, something that the GOP/RNC didn’t do.


247 posted on 11/06/2008 6:12:09 AM PST by Cyclone59 (It is amazing how people are comforted by percentages)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife

I think Operation Chaos backfired.


248 posted on 11/06/2008 6:14:17 AM PST by peggybac (Tolerance is the virtue of believing in nothing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: peggybac
I think Operation Chaos backfired.

Not really, it held too high an opinion of the electorate and didn't take into account the number of totally brain-dead individuals who would vote for the unknown Obama with a "what's the worst that could happen?" attitude.
249 posted on 11/06/2008 6:20:11 AM PST by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 248 | View Replies]

To: aruanan

I’d much rather prefer even Hillary to Obama. Hillary is the “Devil you know.”


250 posted on 11/06/2008 6:22:13 AM PST by dfwgator (I hate Illinois Marxists)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 249 | View Replies]

To: keat

My point EXACTLY - if I don’t agree with you 100% of the time I am to be cleansed and expelled and worse called a RINO. I say it would have been better to get behind an 70% republican rather than have a 100% democrat president.


251 posted on 11/06/2008 7:00:16 AM PST by Cyclone59 (It is amazing how people are comforted by percentages)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Khepri

I don’t know of any liberal politicians who eat squirrel. I proved that Huckabee is conservative, so I know that you weren’t referring to him.


252 posted on 11/06/2008 7:07:34 AM PST by PhilCollins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 170 | View Replies]

To: Sloth

I agree with you, about McCain, since you said that he’s an enemy of the U.S. Constitution. He wrote the campaign finance reform law, which violates the 1st Amendment. He supports spending increases in education and healthcare, which violate the 10th Amendment. If I thought that the race would be close, in my state (Illinois), I would have voted for McCain, since I didn’t want to help split the anti-Obama vote, helping Obama win Illinois’ 21 electoral votes. I knew that Obama would win 58%-59%, in IL, so I voted for Chuck Baldwin.


253 posted on 11/06/2008 7:13:50 AM PST by PhilCollins
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 246 | View Replies]

To: Cyclone59

“McCain was not supported in the same way that obama was by his party”

Um, Obama also supports his own party. McCain hates most of his party.

Frankly, if it were not for Palin, I’d have sat this election out.


254 posted on 11/06/2008 7:17:35 AM PST by Mr Rogers (And if there are those who cannot subscribe to these principles, then let them go their way - Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife
The best post I've seen in ages is Reagan's speech after the Watergate debacle:

"I don ‘t know about you, but I am impatient with those Republicans who after the last election rushed into print saying, “We must broaden the base of our party”—when what they meant was to fuzz up and blur even more the differences between ourselves and our opponents.

It was a feeling that there was not a sufficient difference now between the parties that kept a majority of the voters away from the polls. When have we ever advocated a closed-door policy? Who has ever been barred from participating?

Our people look for a cause to believe in. Is it a third party we need, or is it a new and revitalized second party, raising a banner of no pale pastels, but bold colors which make it unmistakably clear where we stand on all of the issues troubling the people?"

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/2126302/posts

255 posted on 11/06/2008 7:20:55 AM PST by Mr Rogers (And if there are those who cannot subscribe to these principles, then let them go their way - Reagan)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Cyclone59
That’s nice Rush is blaming us.

**********************

Rush is blaming "us"? Only if you consider yourself something other than a conservative.

Limbaugh explained conservatism was not on the ballot.

"We haven't been on the ballot since 1994," he said, noting that if Republicans wanted to win elections, they should not put so-called "moderates" on the ballot.

"The conservative movement does not need to be rebuilt," he said. "We had some people abandon the conservative movement, and they need to be abandoned."

256 posted on 11/06/2008 7:29:26 AM PST by trisham (Zen is not easy. It takes effort to attain nothingness. And then what do you have? Bupkis.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: robert david

“The people who need to be purged are the far right wackos. They have destroyed the Party’s image in the minds’ of the American voters.....”

I am STILL WAITING for proof. Got any?


257 posted on 11/06/2008 8:55:03 AM PST by alarm rider (Peace! through superior fire power....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 199 | View Replies]

To: alarm rider

“The people who need to be purged are the far right wackos. They have destroyed the Party’s image in the minds’ of the American voters.....”

I am STILL WAITING for proof. Got any?”

No, like all lefties they never have proof. Lie, cheat, steal that’s the new GOP game.

Maye we should take the hint and just leave.
Then they can be democrat lights they really are with no hindrance from us ‘knuckledraggers’.

Let’s see how many elections the rino’s can win without us.
Time for a Conservative Party, I’m sick of these good republicans bitching at all of us day after day when we are the ONLY ones who have kept the republican/conservative label alive.

And you know what....they can fight their wars without us and our children dying for them as well.


258 posted on 11/06/2008 9:03:08 AM PST by AuntB (The right to vote in America: Blacks 1870; Women 1920; Native Americans 1925)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 257 | View Replies]

To: genxer
This is america. People are very naive and i don't think they have any idea thats what they voted for.

THis is no longer America, this is Amerika. Just like Ayers and Dorhn spell it.

The Sheep are indeed stupid, and they deserve everything that's coming to them.

259 posted on 11/06/2008 10:06:51 AM PST by Old Sarge (See you in the re-education camp - I call top bunk)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: carton253

As if they had a real choice...please.

We see McCain staffers tactics on display today.

Moderates need to step down en masse....YOU FAILED!


260 posted on 11/06/2008 12:17:30 PM PST by Khepri (NEO-STALIN FASCIST DEFEATS NEO-LIBERAL MAOIST!! How's that working for yah?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 240 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 201-220221-240241-260261-270 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson