Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Top Thirty Errors That Doomed McCain
Pajamas Media ^ | November 4, 2008 | Jennifer Rubin

Posted on 11/05/2008 9:36:33 AM PST by yankeedame

Top Thirty Errors That Doomed McCain

The results are in and the recriminations have begun. Sure, it might not have made any difference, but the number of sins of omission and commission by the McCain campaign is breathtaking. Let’s get a head start on the finger-pointing and give you the top thirty mistakes John McCain and his team made:

There is no telling whether some or all of these errors made a difference. Certainly it was the toughest of years for Republicans. Nevertheless, the campaign was one of the worst displays of organizational and ideological disarray in recent memory. Future candidates should take note of the errors and the error-makers and plan their campaigns accordingly.


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2008; bho2008; mccain; palin
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last
To: yankeedame

Not even Reagan could have won after W’s reign of incompetence.


21 posted on 11/05/2008 9:49:55 AM PST by Moonman62 (The issue of whether cheap labor makes America great should have been settled by the Civil War.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg
What costed McCain the election, once and for all, was the timed and planned market melt down in late September, EOS.

Thank you. The "October Surprise" was as if George "W"(orsepresident) Bush had actually set out to sabotage the McCain/Palin ticket in the belief that an Obama in the White House for four years would somehow restore his legacy.

22 posted on 11/05/2008 9:50:15 AM PST by meandog (Hey Rush: Get it through your head, George W. Bush deserves the blame! Chuck Baldwin 2012!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Perdogg

Which he could have used ^proactively^ by tying Obama and the Dems to Fan/Fred in August when the MSM was talking about foreclosures!


23 posted on 11/05/2008 9:50:32 AM PST by Cletus.D.Yokel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

In my opinion, their mistake was to not put most of their effort into emphasizing the message that Obama was TOO RISKY a choice to make. They started out briefly that way, and then ended up chasing a multitude of other themes, with minimal effect.


24 posted on 11/05/2008 9:50:46 AM PST by expatpat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarkytart
So it is the conservatives who are responsible for the Messiah's election.

Thanks for the insight.

25 posted on 11/05/2008 9:51:07 AM PST by verity ("Lord, what fools we mortals be!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

McCain was actually a democrat tool who was meant to lose and bring down the GOP.


26 posted on 11/05/2008 9:52:43 AM PST by moreofthesame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: verity

actually yes, some conservatives, and many republicans voted for Obama.


27 posted on 11/05/2008 9:53:18 AM PST by snarkytart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: Tired of Taxes

I think the two things that hurt McCain more than anything was the botched handling of the credit crisis and the clumsy Palin roll out (not letting Palin herself off the hook here) which took the steam out of her boffo convention performance.

If the credit crisis could have been staved off for a few months this would have been a 2000 style squeaker.


28 posted on 11/05/2008 9:53:49 AM PST by Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: SonsOfLibertyII
Not so fast my FRiend. SC may be the next NC come 2012.

A transient national workforce, illegal immigration,
a sizeable minority population, retirees from up North,
means that SC’s demographics will be changing over the
next few years.

29 posted on 11/05/2008 9:54:19 AM PST by buckalfa (confused and bewildered)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: P-Marlowe

11) Picking Sarah Palin.
12) Picking Sarah Palin.
13) Picking Sarah Palin.
14) Picking Sarah Palin.
15) Picking Sarah Palin.
16) Picking Sarah Palin.
17) Picking Sarah Palin.
18) Picking Sarah Palin.
19) Picking Sarah Palin.
20) Picking Sarah Palin.

21) Picking Sarah Palin.
22) Picking Sarah Palin.
23) Picking Sarah Palin.
24) Picking Sarah Palin.
25) Picking Sarah Palin.
26) Picking Sarah Palin.
27) Picking Sarah Palin.
28) Picking Sarah Palin.
29) Picking Sarah Palin.
30) Picking Sarah Palin.

Just to help ya’ out there pal.


30 posted on 11/05/2008 9:54:27 AM PST by Mr. Jazzy (USMC- Guarding freedom around the world since 1775)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame
Oboma was the right color at the right time. That made Oboma untouchable, because the anti-American UN forces were here to "make sure America wasn't a racist nation" or "violaters of human rights."

The anti-American world was watching. No one dared "offend" the black guy. He won the day he declared his candidacy.
That's why the left was bold enough to become totally lawless and blatant about it. They knew the anti-American UN election watchers would cover their backs no matter what. The U.N. wanted dirt. America didn't give them any.

Oboma was allowed to walk right into the White house. It was easier to do that than give propaganda to the worlds American haters during our war on terror.

It's just like everything Oboma has ever done. Someone else carried him through college. Someone else carried him through the legislature. Someone else carried him to the senate. Now, the UN and it's money carried him to the White house.

31 posted on 11/05/2008 9:54:36 AM PST by concerned about politics ("Get thee behind me, Liberal")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

Yes. All of those.

Plus the failure to get out the Evangelical vote. That was absolutely critical, and McCain screwed up royally. He was so frightened of the press attacking him for connections with the “religious right” that he just plain ignored the Evangelicals—and probably lost 5 or 10 million votes from folks who stayed home.

As for that mystical “center” who were going to vote for him, so he kept trying to appease them, forget it.

Sarah Palin attracted a lot of Christian voters, but that wasn’t enough.

Also related to this failure was the abortion issue. There was a complete press embargo on Obama’s position as a baby killer, and McCain only barely touched on this issue. He should have been using real Christian pastors to get out the vote for life. But he didn’t. The Catholic bishops did their part, although late in the game, but McCain, who was understandably mistrusted by Evangelicals after his lousy behavior in the 2000 campaign, never reached out, said he was sorry, and healed those wounds.

These are people who believe in the Heavenly City, and only vote occasionally in the Earthly City if something really draws them out. Otherwise, they say “a plague on both your houses” and stay home.


32 posted on 11/05/2008 9:55:12 AM PST by Cicero (Marcus Tullius)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: snarkytart

That was proven wrong yesterday.


33 posted on 11/05/2008 9:56:13 AM PST by MichiganCheese (President B. Hussein O.? That will leave some Marx)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

Sarah Palin was at her best when she was just being Sarah Palin.

Dressing her up in $$$ namebrands, handeling her, scripting her, mandating talking points and buzz phrases, canned answers... it was just forced and artificial.

In jeans and a hoodie, being a Mom, a wife, a neighbor, chatting with regular people, simply speaking what she thought ~ she was pure political gold.

2012 needs Sarah being Sarah, and all handlers need to be tazered.


34 posted on 11/05/2008 9:56:26 AM PST by FreedomFerret
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: wolfpat
I agree with you. Stabbing us in the back all those years meant he was starting this campaign with NO constituency.

Not true, but Chris Matthews and the rest of the MSM (you know, McCain's constituency) did abandon McCain for someone farther to the left.

35 posted on 11/05/2008 9:57:44 AM PST by Smedley (It's a sad day for American capitalism when a man can't fly a midget on a kite over Central Park)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

A good list...except for the last one.

You cant win the industrial Midwest promoting bad trade deals...the “protectionist” comments in the (formerly) industrial Midwest is like saying “Arafat” in a conservative Jewish community in Israel...a non-starter

Also, running a pro-illegal alien McCain took away any chance to win the “Reagan Democrats” who are against illegal alienism/amnesty as much as any conservative.

And, already mentioned, supporting the bailout...excersing real poor judgement

A good list, and most of them are so accurate. McCain was a bad candidate, with a bad campaign team.


36 posted on 11/05/2008 9:58:01 AM PST by UCFRoadWarrior (Blaming Palin: The McCain-GOPer Exit Strategy On Losing The Election?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reagan69
Wasting time in PA.

Having volunteered in PA, the loss by ELEVEN points tells me that McCain's biggest mistake may well have been that his internal pollsters were morons. We were told that not only PA, but a number of other races in other states were highly competitive and the public polls were mistaken. WRONG. As bad as even, say, Gallup was in PA, he was within the margin of error here. McCain's internals weren't even within twice margin of the final result.

37 posted on 11/05/2008 9:58:01 AM PST by FredZarguna (PA: 11 points isn't a "field goal." Who was McCain's pollster?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

# 31. Accepting the limits of “public financing” for his campaign, and being unable to compete with Obama’s airtime.


38 posted on 11/05/2008 9:58:49 AM PST by Lou L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: yankeedame

# 31. Accepting the limits of “public financing” for his campaign, and being unable to compete with Obama’s airtime.


39 posted on 11/05/2008 9:58:53 AM PST by Lou L
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Mr. Jazzy

That’s ridiculous. Palin’s persona and inexperience may have turned off some independents and Repubs, but she fired up the base far more than a Romney or Pawlenty would have, which at least cancels out the haters. Remember we were facing a candidate that SNL refused to make fun of out of fear it would harm his chances.


40 posted on 11/05/2008 9:59:12 AM PST by Callahan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 101-102 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson