Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama ruled ineligible to run? Stay tuned (yawn)
Philadelphia Daily News ^ | Fri, Oct. 24, 2008 | Gar Joseph and Dave Davies

Posted on 10/24/2008 7:31:37 AM PDT by presidio9

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last

1 posted on 10/24/2008 7:31:37 AM PDT by presidio9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: presidio9

I might be wrong but the more this stuff comes out, the more I think this whole thing is a Dem smoke screen to get us focused on going down a rabbit trail that leads to nowhere but losing if we continue to concentrate on this.


2 posted on 10/24/2008 7:33:54 AM PDT by truthandlife ("Some trust in chariots and some in horses, but we trust in the name of the LORD our God." (Ps 20:7))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Berg's suit has been hot stuff in the right-wing blogosphere for a while.

True but it's a democrat vs democrat fight.
3 posted on 10/24/2008 7:35:15 AM PDT by cripplecreek (Paying taxes for bank bailouts is apparently the patriotic thing to do. [/sarc])
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Watch grandma end up dying in the next day or two. Shades of Clinton.


4 posted on 10/24/2008 7:35:15 AM PDT by Sig Sauer P220 (Thanks to the robber barons in D.C. and on Wall St. I've been forced to become a minimalist.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

somehow, i don’t see a resolution coming to this before the election. by that time, may be too late.


5 posted on 10/24/2008 7:35:18 AM PDT by Always Right (Obama: more arrogant than Bill Clinton, more naive than Jimmy Carter, and more liberal than LBJ.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Also worth noting is a birth announcement in the Sunday, Aug. 13, 1961, Honolulu Advertiser listing Obama's birth there on Aug. 4.

I have not heard this before - It would seem to make this lawsuit look silly.

6 posted on 10/24/2008 7:35:29 AM PDT by NY.SS-Bar9 (DR #1692)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Whether Berg is right or not, the information is damaging enough that voters won’t take a risk on voting in a possibly illegitimate President. Then we’d get flaplips Biden....hardly an improvement.


7 posted on 10/24/2008 7:35:30 AM PDT by pray4liberty (Watch, pray, and work. This election will separate the sheep from the goats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

Am I the only ne that saw this posted briefly on FR a few minutes ago?
Now it is gone
http://docs.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/pennsylvania/paedce/2:2008cv04083/281573/27/0.html


8 posted on 10/24/2008 7:36:01 AM PDT by junebug58 (An Arkansas republican (one of the few))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Unsigned and not dated decree means zero.
9 posted on 10/24/2008 7:36:05 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (Obama and ITS thugs are made paranoid by Sarahnoia. (stole from molly_jack2007))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

This will be the longest shower I’ve ever taken!!!


10 posted on 10/24/2008 7:36:46 AM PDT by MNlurker
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9

The problem with doing so now is that the DNC can send in Hillary, who gave some votes to McCain once he picked Sarah. If Hillary runs now, what will happen to those votes? Will McCain lose them back to Hillary? Will she keep all of Obama’s votes or will some go to McCain and make up the difference?


11 posted on 10/24/2008 7:36:55 AM PDT by CodeToad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: junebug58
I saw it and dumped the PDF.
The order is not signed and dated October blank, 2008.
12 posted on 10/24/2008 7:38:58 AM PDT by HuntsvilleTxVeteran (Obama and ITS thugs are made paranoid by Sarahnoia. (stole from molly_jack2007))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NY.SS-Bar9

I wasn’t aware newspapers even did birth announcements back then. If that’s the case, I find this whole thing very, very silly. How hard would it be for someone to go look at the microfiche or something? I’ll volunteer to go to Hawaii if FR pays my way!!!


13 posted on 10/24/2008 7:40:10 AM PDT by Hildy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
Berg's suit has been hot stuff in the right-wing blogosphere for a while.

Berg is a Hillary Democrat, a DP operative for thirty years.

I can't stand mediots.

14 posted on 10/24/2008 7:40:14 AM PDT by Carry_Okie (The fourth estate is the fifth column.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: presidio9
There's no way that any “privacy” laws...or any other kind of laws (state or Federal)....should prevent the release of *any* government document that would serve to prove or refute the citizenship or age claims of any candidate for the Presidency of the United States.
15 posted on 10/24/2008 7:41:01 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Obama:"Ich bin ein beginner")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pray4liberty

I agree. This will not be resolved by election day.

BUT, what it will do is create enough doubt with many voters in the middle not to take a chance on electing Hussein. This allong with allll the other stuff (Ayres, ACORN, Socialism, etc.) will stick and people will not vote fro Hussein.


16 posted on 10/24/2008 7:41:30 AM PDT by TMA62 (TMA62)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: junebug58

Hmm. An order for Hussein to be removed from the ballot? One wonders why the Dems are ignoring this. Shouldn’t they be filing an emergency appeal to a higher court or even the SC?


17 posted on 10/24/2008 7:41:38 AM PDT by saganite (Obama (Senator Government) is a political STD)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Always Right
somehow, i don’t see a resolution coming to this before the election. by that time, may be too late

Why, is there a statute of limitations on this, if proven true?

18 posted on 10/24/2008 7:42:05 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife

I agree that this line of attack will probably not succeed, and may divert from better arguments. I think the most effective line of attack is Obama’s lack of experience. In Biden’s own words (from when Biden was running for president), Obama is not ready to be president. Then Biden recently says Obama will face an international crisis to test his experience. Run these two Biden clips together from now until November 4, and I think you will see Obama’s numbers drop...a lot.


19 posted on 10/24/2008 7:42:24 AM PDT by Texan Tory
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: truthandlife

I agree. Even if this is true, someone down the line (Howard Dean) knew this and has successfully covered it up. You must be able to believe that they couldn’t ‘produce’ the necessary ‘documents’ Chicago Style. The Ultimate Punk on the USA.
All you really can argue is reality. Inform the voters of what his ‘plans’ mean for us. Cause when the sh*t hits the fan, reality stinks.


20 posted on 10/24/2008 7:42:42 AM PDT by griswold3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 141-145 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson