I thought you were suppose to be fair. Could Ann Coulter do a follow up debate? How do we know she did not give Obama campaign the questions last week. How could she NOT have a conflict of interest. There is no way PBS did not know a long time ago she was big Obama backer and was writing this book. I don't think we could trust anyone at this point. It is so obvious 90% of all tv, newsprint... including you are against anyone who is pro-life, pro-family, pro-God and pro-responsiblity.
I know. She'll ask a couple hard questions to Biden to make it look fair. Problem is, we all believe he had the answers last week.
Because there are far more left-leaning journalists than right-leaning journalists, it would be far more biased to have a right-leaning “journalist” if you really think about it. That proves that this is balanced.
And this is a surprise to whom?
"Do you think they made the same assumptions about Lou Cannon when he wrote his book about Reagan?" asked Ifill, host of PBS' "Washington Week" and senior correspondent on "The NewsHour."
Let me guess, a book subtitled "Age of Obama" is going to be about Ayres and Rezko.
It's bad enough they're all biased, but it's downright insulting when they lie after being caught and then try and impugn the people asking questions.
No to arrive at that inference would be credulity boarding on the obtuse. Does anyone think Ifill would declare an "Age of Obama" that ushered in a new generation of black leaders as a negative, unless he lost the election, which of course is the outcome at the heart of the conflict of interest?
At least he’s doing one thing right.
Ifill is on NPR or PBS? (same thing)
What more info does one need?
Why are the republican candidates in these debates entering the alligator pit with a steak strapped to thier a##es? every time! Are these guys idiots, Mccian say’s Ifill is a profeesional and I am sure she will do a good job! She has a book about Obama to be released on January 20th Inauguation day, is she confident? You bet! is she going to be unbiased? you bet! Has he any idea what the media is doing to him and Sarah? I am at a lose for words with this guy! GET THE HELL OUT THERE AND FIGHT, STOP BEING THE NICE GUY, TAKE THE GLOVES OFF, FIGHT FOR GOD SAKE!
Why are the republican candidates in these debates entering the alligator pit with a steak strapped to thier a##es? every time! Are these guys idiots, Mccian say’s Ifill is a profeesional and I am sure she will do a good job! She has a book about Obama to be released on January 20th Inauguation day, is she confident? You bet! is she going to be unbiased? you bet! Has he any idea what the media is doing to him and Sarah? I am at a lose for words with this guy! GET THE HELL OUT THERE AND FIGHT, STOP BEING THE NICE GUY, TAKE THE GLOVES OFF, FIGHT FOR GOD SAKE!
What man uses powder foundation on his face, why none other than CARL CAMERON. The evidence speaks for itself in the Documentary: Alexandra Pelosi’s - Journeys With George. The Sisters of Sappho: Carl Cameron, Condoleeza Rice, Larry Craig, Ken Mehlman, Charlie Crist, David Dreier and the insufferable, despicable out of the closet old queen: Barney-mush mouth-Frank./Just Asking - seoul62......
Powell is a liberal. So a more fair question would be: Is J.C. Watts or Michael Steele profiled?
I thought not.
Ifill is in an impossible position. With her future earnings on the line, she has a GLARING conflict of interest. If she had any integrity — and was absolutely sure she could be entirely objective — she would have turned down the moderating gig. That she not only hasn’t, but apparently WON’T, even with all the heat now on her, says that she has absolutely no integrity.
Ifill is in an impossible position. With her future earnings on the line, she has a GLARING conflict of interest. If she had any integrity — and was absolutely sure she could be entirely objective — she would have turned down the moderating gig. That she not only hasn’t, but apparently WON’T, even with all the heat now on her, says that she has absolutely no integrity.
Ifill’s book will have to be amazing if it deals with politics “in the age of Obama” and yet she claims his story is only a SMALL part. The age of Obama sounds like it will be all about him—that would disappoint readers who judge a book by it’s cover. Is she going to bait and switch her liberal readers?
"Insinuates?"
Ifill as moderator is absolutely a deal breaker.
How stupid will the GOP look in years to come that their POTUS candidate was so cowed by PC that he couldn't even insist on a fair moderator?
And then to suck up to Ifill... 'I know she will be fair..."
Sickening, even to the Rats, I bet, to see people so cowed by the race thing.
I would tell Ifill...You're totally corrupt, you lack even a shred of self awareness, or you are totally stupid: Pick one.
Unclear? Hmm...so "The Age Of Obama" might be unfavorable? What is unclear here is just how stupid this particular reporter is, or thinks we are.