Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Brazil Plans to Build 50 More Nuclear Power Plants ( while America plans to build... windmills! )
Xinhua ^ | Sept. 12 , 2008 | staff

Posted on 09/14/2008 11:44:08 AM PDT by kellynla

RIO DE JANEIRO, Sept. 12 (Xinhua) -- Mines and Energy Minister Edison Lobao announced Friday Brazil plans to build 50 to 60 nuclear power plants in half a century, with each having capacity of 1,000 megawatts.

"The general idea is to build one plant per year," he said during a visit to the construction site of Brazil's third nuclear power plant, Angra 3.

The ambitious plan, a priority for the administration of President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, has yet to be approved by Brazil's National Council of Energy Policy, he added.

The construction of Angra 3 started in 1984, but was halted for21 years. The decision to resume the project and expand the nuclear program was welcomed by Brazil's industrial sector as a way to prevent an energy crisis in future decades, but environmentalists warned of the problem of the residues storage.

(Excerpt) Read more at news.xinhuanet.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Extended News; Foreign Affairs; Government
KEYWORDS: brazil; energy; nuclearpower; windfarms
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last
To: EERinOK
Conversion of corn to ethanol is stupid. Conversion of cane sugar to ethanol may or may not be. The truth is that, yes, it is more energy efficient, but no one is actually sure how efficiently it's done because in Brazil this process is heavily subsidized and many of the subsidies are hidden.

More importantly, proponents of ethanol conversion by whatever means -- except biomass conversion, which may never be economical -- do not consider the lost opportunity cost of turning food into fuel. That cost is extremely high, and to the extent that it displaces primary agricultural grain sources has a ripple effect in increased costs and lost efficiencies throughout the economy.

Your comment made the same point as mine with a lot more words, but thanks for amplifying.

21 posted on 09/14/2008 12:12:31 PM PDT by FredZarguna (Don't tase me, Pa!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Brazil wants 50-60 nuclear power plants by 2050.

China wants to build 100 nuclear plants by 2020.

Westinghouse is selling AP-1000 reactors all over the world.

They have sold six in the U.S.

Our irrational fear of nuclear energy may well be what leads the U.S. to being a third-world country by mid-century.

Anyone who studies the history of energy production will realize nuclear power was the logical next step for electric generation after coal. Instead, now we are putting up natural gas fired plants all over the place, which is increasing the demand for, and driving up the cost of, natural gas.

Even global warming phobia is not enough to cause the radical left to give up on their nuclear phobia.

It is the 21st century. We should be living in the Jetson's world. Instead we have a rerun of the Carter years, complete with gas lines.

Thank you, Jane Fonda.

22 posted on 09/14/2008 12:33:53 PM PDT by magellan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat

Which Rebublican would that be????


23 posted on 09/14/2008 12:34:11 PM PDT by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: kellynla
Brazil Plans to Build 50 More Nuclear Power Plants ( while America plans to build... windmills! )

Another SAD day for the United States of America.

This is just another insult...after I honestly explained to
a cousin that Brazil has been running a MUCH more SANE domestic
energy policy than the USA.
FOR DECADES.

As I paid attention to the "Chemical and Engineering News"
article about Brazil's plan to not be a slave-nation to Saudi Arabia
and other terrorist-nations.
And that was about 15-20 years ago.
24 posted on 09/14/2008 12:38:39 PM PDT by VOA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: WHBates

You really don’t know???http://wikimapia.org/1018446/Phipps-Bend-Nuclear-Reactor-Site


25 posted on 09/14/2008 12:47:24 PM PDT by org.whodat (Republicans should support the SAM Walton business model, and then drill???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

26 posted on 09/14/2008 12:52:34 PM PDT by doug from upland (8 million views of HILLARY! UNCENSORED - put some ice on it, witch)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kellynla

Brazil looks to the future and sees nuclear power plants; the Democrats look 500 years in the past and see windmills.


27 posted on 09/14/2008 12:55:17 PM PDT by AlaskaErik (I served and protected my country for 31 years. Democrats spent that time trying to destroy it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: whitedog57
Pelosi invests in Picken’s wind company. If a Republican did that, they would brought up on charges.

Ya got that right. Charges would be filed after weeks of abuse by NYT et al.

When questioned on a Sunday talk show a few weeks ago, Speaker Stretch commented that she invested only $50K, a small percentage of her available investment funds. No further questions or followup from the old media.

28 posted on 09/14/2008 12:57:59 PM PDT by Jacquerie (All Muslims are suspect.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: org.whodat
I wouldn't have ask if I knew and I don't think you do either. While the plant was canceled in 1982, what does the TVA BOD decision shutting down a make work boon doggle have to do with the then Republican President (several other TVA projects were canceled in the same time frame BTW, all in the wake of TMI and decreasing electrical demand). He (Reagan) disliked the concept of TVA BTW not Nuclear power.
29 posted on 09/14/2008 1:57:35 PM PDT by WHBates
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The Don Quixote solution?


30 posted on 09/14/2008 6:22:19 PM PDT by pray4liberty (It's the smile that keeps me out of trouble.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-30 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson