Seats still available!
The wackiest, ACORN'iest comedy act in the history of the world!
[rimshot]
[special thanks to Rush Limbaugh for the pic]
Posted on 09/12/2008 2:31:28 PM PDT by Laissez-faire capitalist
... While a member of the Illinois state legislature, Barack Obama voted YES on SB99, the so-called "comprehensive sex education" act sponsored by palnned Parenthood and the ACLU. The act includes a provision for sex education for kindergarten children. It passed March 6th, 2003.
... The Obama campaign and some commentators are trying to spin the sex education bill as a device to prevent sexual predators. Sorry folks, that is only one part of the bill, SB99 section 4. The full text is here. It is a comprehensive sex education bill for public schools in Illinois which covers the following:
SB99 - Illinois 2003 K-12 Comprehensive Sex Education Bill ...
(Excerpt) Read more at rightpundits.com ...
SB99 is an obamination, which is why Obama is trying so desperately to spin this.
SB99, the documents on Ayers coming out, the truth about how numerous low - income apartment complexes (which were in his Illinois Senate dictrict) became rat and drug-dealer infested and had sewers backing up in the kitchen sinks and had to be demolished - all of which were owned by his pal Rezko and friends of his (now helping out his campaign in an official capacity) - are reasons why Obama has most likely sent over 30 investigators and lawyers to Alaska to possibly work behind the scenes with Democrats in the so-called "TrooperGate" issue.
Wasn't there a Republican (who Obama ran against for his Illinois Senate seat) that Obama worked against to get this Republican's divorce papers put into the public light so that he would drop out? Isn't Obama into clearing the field of all opposition? Didn't a Democrat judge allow those divorce papers of his Republican opponent to come to light?
Makes you wonder just why those 30 lawyers and investigators are up in Alaska...
Yes, Obama’s lie about this (SB99) just being a bill to prevent sexual predators is exposed.
Great resource here! I just heard Hannity reading sections of the Obama Kindergarten Sex-Ed plan.
Obama wants five year olds to learn how to masturbate, and the need for privacy [to hide from parents] while doing it.
Barackula is toast.
Obama Family Values: Teach the kids early to masterbate, have sex and abortions earlier.
Moral Absolutes ping!
Seats still available!
The wackiest, ACORN'iest comedy act in the history of the world!
[rimshot]
[special thanks to Rush Limbaugh for the pic]
Conservatives need to e-mail a link of the full text of that bill to as many people as they can.
This needs to be spread around the net... Hard for libtards to spin this when the full text and the info contained therein is staring back at them.
Between BO’s silly email ad and this [and the previous foopahs], and gas prices shooting up again, the news cycles are about to be crowded beyond anyone’s imaginings.
Gotta’ run.
FRegards ....
Hell yeah, take the fight to Obama, make his lousy skinny @$$ defend his legislative past. I posted on another thread that I don't get why libs are so fixated on teaching other people's kids about sex...why is it so hard for them to get that some things are simply parental prerogative? Why do they want government to take the place of parents?
I will assume that most five year olds have learned that by themselves. They don’t need the school teaching them how. EEEEWWWW. This is getting really disgusting.
LOL
Sean Hannity was reading from what he called a ‘syllabus’ today and yesterday. It was explicit on exactly what is in the ‘age appropriate’ sex ed in schools.
I have searched his site and searched google but was unsuccessful. I might not be using the correct search terms.
Anyone know where I can see a copy of it?
He is losing all credibility.
Next when president he’ll want a blow up Obama doll for every child.
What a sicko..
Yes, Obama’s lie about this (SB99) just being a bill to prevent sexual predators is exposed.
You are correct that he lied but just try getting the media and the public to hear it. That’ the trick. Getting the truth out because the left does not deal in facts just lies.
Parents -- strong, loving, responsible ones especially -- are a threat to everything the left holds dear.
As another group of (far less malevolent) indoctrinators used to say, "Give me the child for his first seven years, and he'll be mine for life."
Isolating children from their mom and dad is the first step in the process of making sheep.
http://www.siecus.org/_data/global/images/guidelines.pdf
For a moment - forget about the Kindergarten portion - and look at the rest of what it will teach kids as they progress through 1st through 12th grade. Wow!
I quote:
Life Behaviors of a Sexually Healthy Adult
A sexually healthy adult will:
• Appreciate one’s own body.
• Seek further information about reproduction as needed.
• Affirm that human development includes sexual development, which may or may not
include reproduction or sexual experience.
• Interact with all genders in respectful and appropriate ways.
• Affirm one’s own sexual orientation and respect the sexual orientations of others.
• Affirm one’s own gender identities and respect the gender identities of others.
• Express love and intimacy in appropriate ways.
• Develop and maintain meaningful relationships.
• Avoid exploitative or manipulative relationships.
• Make informed choices about family options and relationships.
• Exhibit skills that enhance personal relationships.
• Identify and live according to one’s own values.
• Take responsibility for one’s own behavior.
• Practice effective decision-making.
• Develop critical-thinking skills.
• Communicate effectively with family, peers, and romantic partners.
• Enjoy and express one’s sexuality throughout life.
• Express one’s sexuality in ways that are congruent with one’s values.
• Enjoy sexual feelings without necessarily acting on them.
Unquote
And as for Level 1 (5 and 6 years olds) there is nothing in here that says they will be taught only about predators.
The worst part of the whole bill is if you read the parts that were stricken before the bill was passed. These are just a few of the stricken parts:
These parts were completely stricken from the final bill and replaced with other, much more liberal language:
abstinence is the expected norm in that abstinence from sexual intercourse is the only protection that is 100% effective against unwanted teenage pregnancy
(2) Course material and instruction shall teach honor and respect for monogamous heterosexual marriage.
(3) Course material and instruction shall stress that pupils should abstain from sexual intercourse until they are ready for marriage.
(4) Course material and instruction shall include a discussion of the possible emotional and psychological consequences of preadolescent and adolescent sexual intercourse outside of marriage and the consequences of unwanted adolescent pregnancy.
These parts were changed a great deal:
then such courses of instruction shall include the teaching of prevention of unintended pregnancy and all options related to unintended pregnancy (This section originally said “then such courses of instruction shall include the teaching of the alternatives to abortion”)
In addition, everywhere that the original bill included the words “sexual abstinence until marriage”, the words “until marriage” were stricken, often replaced by “and prevention of unintended pregnancy”.
My questions are (1) why would ANYONE have suggested making the changes I’ve listed above, since even if one didn’t believe in abstinence-only education, it certainly would be a worthy goal to teach children that abstinence until marriage is the expected norm and the safest and most reliable method of birth control, and (2) how can we find out if Barack Obama was the author of any of the amendments that made the changes above?
This is devastating. The bill says that the program requires from grades K-12, education on preventing sexually transmitted diseases. That’s a mandate. Even if it’s somehow made “appropriate” for a kindergartener, how does one actually achieve that? How is the subject matter in any way appropriate for a friggin’ FIVE YEAR OLD! What kind of person thinks it CAN be appropriate???
(I wonder if we’ll get to quiz his own kids on their level of sex education?)
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.