Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Obama gets ovation with ‘lipstick on pig’
Reuters ^

Posted on 09/09/2008 5:17:34 PM PDT by Chet 99

September 9th, 2008

Obama gets ovation with ‘lipstick on pig’

LEBANON, Va - Democrat Barack Obama enjoys poking fun at his Republican opponents and their claims to being “agents of change.”

“You can put lipstick on a pig. It’s still a pig,” he said as the crowd cheered and yelled and eventually got to their feet.

“You can wrap an old fish in a piece of paper called change. It’s still gonna stink.”

“We’ve had enough of the same old thing.”

The audience, which had a particularly strong reaction whenever Obama mentioned Republican vice presidential nominee Sarah Palin, appeared to enjoy the “lipstick” comment the most.

When Palin gave her acceptance speech at the Republican convention in St. Paul she joked about being a hockey mom, saying the only difference between a pitbull and a hockey mom was lipstick.

(Excerpt) Read more at blogs.reuters.com ...


TOPICS: News/Current Events; US: Virginia
KEYWORDS: lipstick; obama; obamabiden; pig; va2008
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-146 next last
To: EyeGuy

You know how it is, those that are muslim do not like pigs.

Maybe thats what scares him.


61 posted on 09/09/2008 5:55:24 PM PDT by dforest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: muawiyah
"The expressions were typical of those used by male homosexuals about women."

That does not interest me in the slightest. The cliche is an old one, by no means a stereotypically homosexual one, and there's nothing wrong with it. Obama's used it before, McCain's used it before, there are at least four books with that title and there was nothing wrong with Obama using it the way he used it today.
62 posted on 09/09/2008 5:56:38 PM PDT by Lyford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Carley

No! Reuters did not “get it.” Its tone was limey-bemused and did not comprehend how the words spoken by Obama could be used against him.


63 posted on 09/09/2008 5:56:38 PM PDT by Melchior
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99

I’d like someone to review that comment he made about people “throwing rocks and hiding their hands.” That sounds like an ancient Muslim comment.


64 posted on 09/09/2008 5:58:27 PM PDT by Selmore (You want fries with that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99

You can put a one term unaccomplished senator from Illinois in a suit and make him the nominee of the Democrat party but he’s still a jerk.


65 posted on 09/09/2008 5:59:00 PM PDT by Don'tMessWithTexas
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Lyford; libstripper; dfwgator
He didn't call her a pig. He used a time-worn cliche. If McCain had chosen Mitt Romney as his VP and Obama has used that same cliche...

Of course he did. Didn't you watch her RNC speech, where she said about hockey moms (herself included), that the only difference between them and a pit bull was...lipstick.

Anyway, if you didn't see it, here it is...

Sarah Palin's 2008 RNC Convention Speech (44 mins)
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=vKgNrb3baNM

66 posted on 09/09/2008 5:59:45 PM PDT by ETL (Smoking-gun evidence on all the ObamaRat-Commie connections at my FR Profile/Home page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Lyford
Obama knew exactly what he was saying and the intent as well as the impact, Thereof.

As Hewitt said, Obama's insincere, non-apology proves the point.

67 posted on 09/09/2008 6:00:24 PM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Lady GOP
Here's his statement. I'll warn you that it's one of the most offensive things I've ever read along with Peter Singer territory.

SENATOR O'MALLEY:

Thank you. Madam President, Ladies and Gentlemen of the Senate. Senate Bill 1093, as amended, provides that no abortion procedure which, in the medical judgment of the attending physician, has a reasonable likelihood of resulting in a live born child shall be undertaken unless there is in attendance a physician other than the physician performing or inducing the abortion who shall assess the child's viability and provide medical care for the child. The bill further provides that if there is a medical emergency, a physician inducing or performing an abortion which results in a live born child shall provide for the soonest practical attendance of a physician other than the physician performing or inducing the abortion to immediately assess the child's viability and provide medical care for the child. The bill additionally provides that a live child born as a result of an -- of --of an abortion procedure shall be fully recognized as a human person and accorded immediate protection under the law. All reasonable measures consistent with good medical practice, including the compilation of appropriate medical records, shall be taken to preserve the life and health of the child. I'd be pleased to answer any questions there may be.

SENATOR OBAMA:………Unfortunately, this bill goes a little bit further, and so I just want to suggest…that this is probably not going to survive constitutional scrutiny. Number one, whenever we define a previable fetus as a person that is protected by the equal protection clause or the other elements in the Constitution, what we're really saying is, in fact, that they are persons that are entitled to the kinds of protections that would be provided to a -- a child, a nine-month-old -- child that was delivered to term. That determination then… would forbid abortions to take place. I mean, it -- it would essentially bar abortions, because the equal protection clause does not allow somebody to kill a child, and if this is a child, then this would be an antiabortion statute. … this essentially says that a doctor is required to provide treatment to a previable child, or fetus, however way you want to describe it. Viability is the line that has been drawn by the Supreme Court to determine whether or not an abortion can or cannot take place. And if we're placing a burden on the doctor that says you have to keep alive even a previable child as long as possible and give them as much medical attention as -- as is necessary to try to keep that child alive, then we're probably crossing the line in terms of unconstitutionality.

68 posted on 09/09/2008 6:01:46 PM PDT by Darren McCarty (Palin in 08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 43 | View Replies]

To: Lyford

>>there was nothing wrong with Obama using it the way he used it today.<<

I didn’t think it was offensive either, but that particular folksy expression sounds pretty silly coming from the same guy who thinks they are bitter hillbillies who cling to guns and religion. I guess he is trying to learn to talk to people who he sees as “trailer trash.”


69 posted on 09/09/2008 6:02:09 PM PDT by ding_dong_daddy_from_dumas (I want to "Buy American" but the only things for sale made in the USA are politicians)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Lyford
Well, whatever you want to think. No doubt the expression has worked its way out into the straight world ~ but not exactly in that configuration.

It was pretty clear what was being said. Obama is going to have to 'splain it all to the big boys who control the campaign bucks of course. No doubt Barney Frank understands it completely.

70 posted on 09/09/2008 6:02:12 PM PDT by muawiyah
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: Chet 99

OK, the rats have now used “shrill”, “fish” and “pig” to describe/compare Palin, possibly the top three words to which women hate to be compared.

I watched Campbell Brown and a bevy of her women political commentators on MSNBC get really PO’d when they read the note from Harry Reid where he used the word “shrill” to describe Palin giving her acceptance speech. One can only imagine the enemies they have made since then.


71 posted on 09/09/2008 6:03:57 PM PDT by HighWheeler (The higher the concentration of libs, the bigger the tragedy that follows.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Orange1998
If she did not say lipstick, BO would have never used the term.

Really? Then why was he quoted using it a year ago? Did he know that Palin would be the Republican VP candidate and use the lipstick joke, and was preemptively preparing a defense? Or was he just using a damned old cliche?

He may very well have been thinking about her when he said it. But it is by no means certain. It's an expression that he uses. And the audience may very well have been thinking about her when he said it. Words mean things, and the words that he used, and the context in which he used them were not inappropriate. The Republicans need to not whine about it.
72 posted on 09/09/2008 6:04:28 PM PDT by Lyford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: HighWheeler
I agree.

If this is a "stand alone" I might give Obama a pass.

But not coming on the heels of the other despicable attacks.

73 posted on 09/09/2008 6:06:45 PM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: Darren McCarty
Thank you for posting this. Hard to believe with his perverse way of thinking BO is a Constitutional lawyer.

I'm passing this along to my email list.

74 posted on 09/09/2008 6:08:01 PM PDT by Lady GOP
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: FFranco
It is Liberal and Democrat women who are the Pigs

Way to keep that political discourse high...
75 posted on 09/09/2008 6:08:06 PM PDT by Lyford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies]

To: Lyford

You’re whining about the Republicans whining.


76 posted on 09/09/2008 6:08:40 PM PDT by Cedric
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 72 | View Replies]

To: Lyford
I think that McCain and Palin should ignore this and move on. No reason to whine. Let Obama sabotage his own campaign.
77 posted on 09/09/2008 6:13:24 PM PDT by just me (Liberals do not like children, and children are one of the reasons I like Sarah Palin.....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: Cedric
You’re whining about the Republicans whining.

If I were to concede that characterization (though I don't agree with it) it's because I more from the Republicans than the Democrats.
78 posted on 09/09/2008 6:14:49 PM PDT by Lyford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 76 | View Replies]

To: Cedric
America was/is ready to elect a black man President, but not a black man who calls a white woman a pig.

Or hops in bed with communist revolutionaries who once tried to overthrow the American government.

From David Horowitz's FrontPageMag.com/DiscoverTheNetworks.org:
"FBI files from 1976, recently made public under the Freedom of Information Act, confirm the connections between Weatherman, Havana, and Moscow. Weatherman leaders like Mark Rudd traveled illegally to Havana in 1968 to engage in terrorist training. There, camps set up by Soviet KGB Colonel Vadim Kotchergine were educating Westerners both in Marxist philosophy and urban warfare."

___________________________________________________________

"Their founding document [the Weather Underground's] called for the establishment of a "white fighting force" to be allied with the "Black Liberation Movement" and other "anti-colonial" movements [1] to achieve "the destruction of US imperialism and the achievement of a classless world: world communism."..." -Berger, Dan (2006). Outlaws of America: The Weather Underground and the Politics of Solidarity. AK Press, pg 95.

___________________________________________________________

Bill Ayers TODAY (April 6, 2008), from his own red communist star-headed website, begging to debate communism vs capitalism with Sean Hannity and STILL calling for revolution!


"Imperialism. I’m against it, and if Sean Hannity and others were honest, this is the ground they would fight me on. Capitalism played its role historically and is exhausted as a force for progress: built on exploitation, theft, conquest, war, and racism, capitalism and imperialism must be defeated and a world revolution—a revolution against war and racism and materialism, a revolution based on human solidarity and love, cooperation and the common good —must win.

We begin by releasing our most hopeful dreams and our most radical imaginations: a better world is both possible and necessary.

Source: Bill Ayers' own website

___________________________________________________________


Voice of the Revolutionary Communist Party, USA [Maoist]
Revolution #63, October 1, 2006

Interview with Bill Ayers:
On Progressive Education, Critical Thinking and the Cowardice of Some in Dangerous Times

___________________________________________________________


Much more on the ObamaRat-commie connections at my FR Profile/Home page.
Everything there is linked directly to its source, including what I posted above:
http://www.freerepublic.com/~etl

79 posted on 09/09/2008 6:16:05 PM PDT by ETL (Smoking-gun evidence on all the ObamaRat-Commie connections at my FR Profile/Home page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: EscapedDutch

My husband said the same exact thing in a completely un-P.C. way (not repeatable)


80 posted on 09/09/2008 6:16:31 PM PDT by mpackard (Read my Lip-Stick)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100 ... 141-146 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson