To: delacoert
Drudge did not change the verbiage when he linked it back to his own page. This makes me think that this is Drudge's idea of fun.
A “front expose” of the baby could just be a (tasteful) picture of him being diapered.
160 posted on
09/07/2008 4:37:49 PM PDT by
Artemis Webb
(Sarah Palin: Babies, Guns, Jesus. HOT DAMN!)
To: Artemis Webb
No he links to his own page when he’s not ready to put out the details. It’ll stay that way until either the NY Times runs the story on line or he has enough to run his own story. He has be worry about being sandbagged by the NY Times or who ever his source is.
306 posted on
09/07/2008 4:58:36 PM PDT by
airedale
( XZ)
To: Artemis Webb
A “front expose” of the baby could just be a (tasteful) picture of him being diapered. I bet you're right and this is just Drudge sensationalism. I read on FR somewhere today that S. Palin changed Trig's diaper right before her speech on Wednesday. I bet they have a picture of that.
377 posted on
09/07/2008 5:07:55 PM PDT by
Jemian
(Nobama - wants to kill babies & raise taxes; Palin - wants to kill taxes & raise babies!)
To: Artemis Webb
A “front expose” of the baby could just be a (tasteful) picture of him being diapered.
Well, didn't Cindy Adams report that Sarah changed the baby right before her speech. Perhaps Cindy snapped pics.
460 posted on
09/07/2008 5:24:40 PM PDT by
Miss Didi
("Good heavens, woman, this is a war not a garden party!" Dr. Meade, Gone with the Wind)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson