Mine, too.
Posted on 09/07/2008 4:14:17 PM PDT by jern
Drudge: NY Times Prepares To Front Expose on Palin's Baby...Developing...
LOL
They are probably going to go after Willow.
He only spent $500,000 on the plane remodeling - chump change for his campaign. He already gave almost twice that to ACORN to get the voter fraud started.
Beat me to it!
“mainland” Greek, or from one of the island
Both! Mother from the Isle of Rhodes and Father from Mycenea.
Is this your best guess or is there actually a story out there?
Just pick one Fred, Drudge’s slime turned out to be a bust and yours are more interesting than the stuff the media has been trying.
Whoa..
That’s extraordinary...
Listening to Axelrod today on FNS today- he seemed dispirited and off his game and unable to answer the questions posed by Wallace. Their internals must be dreadful.
That is the cutest commercial on TV. I love that little baby...Wow, bad girl! Can I get you later?
April 18th to April 21st is 3 days, not one day. Sheesh! The story has been debunked!
LOL love that commercial.
“Can I hit you back?”
Thank you, thank you for posting those lovely photos. One of my favorite moments from the convention (although there were many!)
MSNBC drops Keith Olbermann and Chris Matthews from anchor chair... David Gregory will anchor news coverage of the coming debates and election night.... Developing...
The media is already livid because McCain's campaign will not throw Gov. Palin to them so they can get in her face with their nasty questions. They can not stomach a candidate not vetted by them.
I have quit watching Chris Wallace, but caught the transcript of satellite radio this afternoon. He had Obama's mgr. on and Chris asked him some hard questions, which Ackerman? did not answer--just spouted talking points and tried to run against Bush. Wallace had a hard time getting Ack. to shut up and let him in.
Then Chris had Rick Davis, McCain's chief strategist on and was absolutely hateful about Palin. He said she lobbied for money as mayor (Davis said that money was in the works before her election). Chris said she lied about the money for the Bridge, that Congress decided not to fund it. Davis countered that millions had already been given to Alaska and she built a ferry which cost less than half the ramp for the bridge, saving millions. He said she vetoed more spending than ay gov. ever.--Wallace kept saying no, the Congress stopped the funding. Then Chris said she lobbied for earmarks as gov. Davis said no, Stevens already had lobbied for some that came in after she was elected.
Then Chris said she HAD to come on shows and be asked hard questions (be vetted by the media)Davis said she would, but when the campaign decided. He said they certainly were not going to throw her to the media while the msm were trying to trash her. I liked Davis. He didn't let Chris get away with anything.
vaudine
It’s just my guess that the NY Times story will be favorable. The guess is based on looking at some of the lefty blogs, and of course, reading Ace’s blog. I see someone up in the comments before mine has already given credit to Ace for this and I’m happy to defer to his much greater wisdom.
The MSM has felt significant blow-back from their hatchet pieces on Palin. They know this has the capability of significantly hurting their revenue and whatever minimal credibility they have left. They are backing off on their first attack line. Now they’re clamoring and complaining they can’t speak to her. Where is she, etc. McCain’s campaign is stating to the media because of ‘your guys’ hatchet jobs we will allow her to speak in OUR time, not yours.’ Nice approach.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.