Drudge: NY Times Prepares To Front Expose on Palin's Baby...Developing...

NY Times via Drudge ^

[jern]

Drudge: NY Times Prepares To Front Expose on Palin's Baby...Developing...

[GAB-1955]

If they're exposing the front of Palin’s baby, they'd better stand back or they'll get wet.

[IllumiNaughtyByNature]

This could backfire in NY, where say, Rudy could call on sHillary to distance her from the Obamatrain on this and give her a reason to drop the baton for nObama.

[lahargis]

I agree. They showed her pregnant several times. There is no issue here.

[defconw]

I have a friend who has 17 children, 4 sets of twins in the mix. She calls the doc when she is ready to go.

[crazycat]

What no-one seems to realise, in all this mania, is that women in their mid forties are very likely to have a Downs Syndrome baby, whereas the chances of a 17 yr old haveing one, are minute.

[lonestar]

Bristol would have had to be 7 months pregnant with Trig when she got preg with her "latest." LOL!

We have no competent reporting ...except sometimes from the National Enquirer.

[wagglebee]

Is there anyone here who thinks that this could be true? I mean, wasn’t there talk about Palin’s daughter being out of school for a long period of time? I don’t know Sarah Palin, so I can’t know what really happened. I know Palin said she had the baby and then went right back to work the next day. I don’t know, it’s all confusing to me. I hope it isn’t true.

Trig Palin was born April 18, 2008.

Bristol is five months pregnant, which means she conceived sometime in March or early April.

It is physically IMPOSSIBLE for Bristol to be Trig's mother, even the leftists have dropped this pathetic theory.

The ONLY reason they came up with the sick story that Bristol was Trig's mother is because it was fairly well known in Wasilla that Bristol was pregnant. The left jumped to conclusions and assumed that she was Trig's mother.

[Pan_Yan]

If it were Edwards baby then Sarah must have been reeaally drunk, and the Palins would have a lot more money.

[onemiddleamerican]

"The New York Times has learned, through unimpeachable sources, that the baby Sarah Palin claims as her own is really the baby of her 7 year old daughter, Piper. The New York Times has checked, double checked and triple checked this information; and we can assure the reader that this is fact."

(posted only half-mockingly - the NY Times is not above such idiocy)

[sofaman]

not an option. refusing comment will be reported as tacit acknowledgment that this nonsense is accurate.

You have to fight the smears, which is exactly what this is.

And they have the gall to talk of the politics of personal destruction.

[Keith in Iowa]

>>>Good GRIEF- and the Vanity Fair piece thanks DAILY KOS as one of the sources it used for this piece?!?!<<<

Incestuous.

[rbg81]

Let me guess: Dan Rather found a birth certificate that says her baby was born in Kenya and is NOT an American citizen.

[i_dont_chat]

It cannot be an expose of an unborn baby. There is no such thing as an unborn baby, according to abortionists.

They are not claiming an expose on a fetus, are they?

[tophat9000]

I think the Times will insinuate that Todd Palin is not Trig's father by stating that nine months before Trig's birth, he was working on the North Slope while Sarah was in Juneau.

What they never heard of airplane for a quicky nan nookey of the north run?

[defconw]

:)

[cricket]

Really. . .anyone who goes after her 'Motherhood' or her children is in trouble; particularly, after this special on Sarah.

Particularly as well. . .given the messed up kids that we already know from 'daddy' politicians and the 'loving homes' they come from.

[mass55th]

"That’s a combo of John Kerry and Phillis Diller right? YUK"

Actually that was a picture of Cybil Shepard with Kerry's face super-imposed.

[fox0566]

She had a c-section and was back at work the very next day? Isn’t that a little soon? I guess I’m just trying to ready myself for a big shock. Nobody here knows Sarah Palin, and we don’t know what the truth is at this point. It could be true or it may not be true.

[CharlesWayneCT]

I don’t know what’s up with Vanity Fair. It is their blog, not their real magazine, but still it seems odd. They also should have included at least that the “Levi” quote was from a myspace page that is known to be false.