Posted on 09/02/2008 1:42:22 AM PDT by Kevmo
Are they getting their campaign strategies from Seinfeld reruns?
***I hope so.
The answer is NO! B. Hussein’s association with Rev. Wright should have kept him from being a senator, and John Sidney McCain is loony tunes. He and the anorexic Cindy remind me of feeble and gray haired Boris and Natasha.
Fine.
Henceforth, I shall call BoBo “T Bone” with all the mockery and ridicule implied and contained, therein.
[but if he swings his leg over a Harley, surely I shall go mad]
Better to be ruled by a crazy patriot than a sane Marxist.
There is a freeper here from Panama. Null and void, would you be able to ping him/her?
Part of the confussion is McCain was not born on a military base. He was born in Colon and it was not US territory.
Obama is on his own. I like having our chew toy, but if we lose it, we lose it. Maybe the rats could have a write-in campaign. [Shrug]
As for John McCain:
markomalley put to rest [a quote of his earlier post]
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/2065437/posts?page=52#52
8 U.S.C. § 1403. Persons born in the Canal Zone or Republic of Panama on or after February 26, 1904
(a) Any person born in the Canal Zone on or after February 26, 1904, and whether before or after the effective date of this chapter, whose father or mother or both at the time of the birth of such person was or is a citizen of the United States, is declared to be a citizen of the United States.
(b) Any person born in the Republic of Panama on or after February 26, 1904, and whether before or after the effective date of this chapter, whose father or mother or both at the time of the birth of such person was or is a citizen of the United States employed by the Government of the United States or by the Panama Railroad Company, or its successor in title, is declared to be a citizen of the United States.
Please note subparagraph b.
[end of quote]
The only way McCain could lose over this is through rogue ‘supreme’ court justices in the tradition of Kelo. It is a possibility. But if any rat won through such a vile method, there would be hell to pay — the lamest duck in US history, a supreme court will record low approval, and a military that would be tempted to wage a coup.
Note post 26, subparagraph b.
Spot on analysis
Please refrain from abusing the Activism sidebar.
“BoBo the Simp is not a barracuda.
A lamprey, leech or a hagfish, yes but he is NO barracuda.”
LOL—thanks, I needed that. :)
ROTF “Boris and Natasha”
This is getting good...absurdity of the POTUS-arama bringing out the sillies...
My pleasure....:)
Thanks for posting an excellent write-up of the entire fuster-cluck.
The author points out that his belief is even though both are technically ineligible, neither will be prevented by it from being elected and serving, whoever wins.
I tend to think he is correct, but I believe Obama is far MORE than merely technically ineligible.
Check it out: Obama has been subtly telegraphing all along that his ineligibility is based not only on murky birth circumstances and overseas trips/residency/adoption/documentation/oaths, etc...
Obama has been rather openly showing us his “tells” from day one about where his LOYALTIES really are.
Indonesia and Kenya are exotic locales about as far removed from American values and soil and spirit and interests as you can get. Obama’s ties to those places, and in general to the Third World(hell, to any country other than the U.S. for that matter) can be read easily in his words and actions!!
He declares himself a “citizen of the world” while in Germany before a crowd of hundreds of thousands of foreigners, and proceeds to badmouth America there. He badmouths America everywhere he goes, for that matter! He won’t wear a flag pin until his back is to the wall, and he’s on video failing to put his hand over his heart during the National Anthem... Do I have to go on? Is there any question now? There’s more. His wife. His chosen church and pastor. His collaborators over the years, Ayers, Achmed so-and-so, geez...too much to keep typing about.
If there’s ever been a Presidential candidate whose technical ineligibility and OVERT behavior as regards his allegiance to America is to be disputed and refuted, it’s Obama. His divided loyalties should be entered into the record based not only on paper trails and travels and technicalities, but moreover on his contemptuous conduct toward his country, and his fondness for exotic foreign homesteads and interests, including those of our enemies.
The Constitution is pretty clear on the divided loyalty linchpin. Obama is ineligible by documentation AND demonstration.
McCain is simply too legit to quit—Hanoi holds no homefire for him. His heart is here.
Indonesia and Kenya still call out to Hussein.
Besides, the “authorities” would rather have an ineligible POTUS in office than every major “inner-city” in the country on fire with thousands of overturned police cars, etc.
But McCain wasn’t born in the Canal Zone.
McCain wasn’t born on a military base.
Heck yeah!
Certainly!
Part of the confussion is McCain was not born on a military base. He was born in Colon and it was not US territory.
Yep.
Place of birth?
Colón PANAMA
Colón, PANAMA, not Colón Canal Zone. PANAMA
Colón isn't part of the Canal Zone.
It is a separate district and provence, a district and provence of the country of Panama.
Much like West Berlin never belonged to East Germany.
Good morning you fine folks!
I’m right here.
Buenas tardes...
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.