Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: teddyballgame

Picking Palin would definitely make it harder to go after Obama for his “inexperience”. McCain would lose a lot of credibility on that front.


419 posted on 08/29/2008 5:29:43 AM PDT by Tallguy ("The sh- t's chess, it ain't checkers!" -- Alonzo (Denzel Washington) in "Training Day")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 415 | View Replies ]


To: Tallguy

“Picking Palin would definitely make it harder to go after Obama for his “inexperience”. McCain would lose a lot of credibility on that front.”

I disagree. She has 2 more years of executive experience. She is the real Change Agent. She has spearheaded reform. Obama has no accomplishments. Obama is a empty suit, even McCain’s VP who is younger has more experience and more accomplishments.


426 posted on 08/29/2008 5:32:55 AM PDT by igoramus08
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies ]

To: Tallguy
Picking Palin would definitely make it harder to go after Obama for his “inexperience”. McCain would lose a lot of credibility on that front.

You are forgetting one slight detail...Governor Sarah Palin has more executive experience than Obama...he has zero!

This has the makings of a historic day that will rally the base like we haven't seen since 1980! McCain, with all his flaws and I have been a very tough critic of him, is showing that he wants to win!

430 posted on 08/29/2008 5:35:53 AM PDT by NewLand (Barack Obama is no Jackie Robinson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies ]

To: Tallguy

Picking Palin would definitely make it harder to go after Obama for his “inexperience”. McCain would lose a lot of credibility on that front.

Yup. This is a BIG LOSER in my opinion. Say hello to President Obama.

Media meltdown?!? Please. Since when does the media give a Republic candidate any credit. They’ll be ripping him and her 2 minutes after the announcement. The fact she has not been through the national ringer is suicidal. Romney would have cleaned Biden’s clock in the debates and would have been an excellent attack dog. Too bad for McCain he couldn’t check his ego. VP pick is suppose to be ready to step in and be President. Who the hell is Palin?


431 posted on 08/29/2008 5:36:09 AM PDT by teddyballgame
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies ]

To: Tallguy
Picking Palin would definitely make it harder to go after Obama for his “inexperience”. McCain would lose a lot of credibility on that front.

Even if Obama is in the Senate for 30+ years, he still won't be "qualified" for the job.

Obama is running for the top spot. She is running for the top spot in 2016 (unless McCain opts out after one term, then she will be running against Hillary) as the most qualified AND experienced.

Another angle, this could very well put a big damper on the "black" turnout for Obama as they will see that a woman will bring greater numbers to McCain than they can muster for Super-Zero.

This would put "The Sting" on the dems who just showed their hand with 4 nines from a stacked deck only to have McCain throw down 4 Jacks.

Not only does it win this election but it puts 2012 and 2016 in the "OH-Crap" column for the Dems.

439 posted on 08/29/2008 5:40:42 AM PDT by N. Theknow (Proud member of the Pajamarines - First in facts - Semper FReep!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies ]

To: Tallguy
Picking Palin would definitely make it harder to go after Obama for his “inexperience”. McCain would lose a lot of credibility on that front.

Why--does he LOSE experience by having her on the ticket?
458 posted on 08/29/2008 5:53:26 AM PDT by OCCASparky (Steely-Eyed Killer of the Deep)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 419 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson