Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

A Teacher on the Front Line as Faith and Science Clash (time to fight force, with force!)
New York Times ^ | August 23, 2008 | AMY HARMON

Posted on 08/24/2008 2:16:12 PM PDT by GodGunsGuts

...In February, the Florida Department of Education modified its standards to explicitly require, for the first time, the state’s public schools to teach evolution, calling it “the organizing principle of life science.” Spurred in part by legal rulings against school districts seeking to favor religious versions of natural history, over a dozen other states have also given more emphasis in recent years to what has long been the scientific consensus: that all of the diverse life forms on Earth descended from a common ancestor, through a process of mutation and natural selection, over billions of years.

But in a nation where evangelical Protestantism and other religious traditions stress a literal reading of the biblical description of God’s individually creating each species, students often arrive at school fearing that evolution, and perhaps science itself, is hostile to their faith.

Some come armed with “Ten questions to ask your biology teacher about evolution,” a document circulated on the Internet that highlights supposed weaknesses in evolutionary theory. Others scrawl their opposition on homework assignments. Many just tune out.

(Click link for full article)

(Excerpt) Read more at nytimes.com ...


TOPICS: Constitution/Conservatism; Culture/Society; Government; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: arrogance; corruption; creation; darwinandstate; darwiniacs; darwinisreligion; darwinreligion; darwinsfairytale; education; election; elections; evolution; evolutionfairytale; governmentschools; govwatch; homosexualagenda; intelligentdesign; jackbootedthugs; nobana08; obama; prolife; religion; scienceeducation
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 441-446 next last
To: Soliton

Using the political process is force. We have tried to reason with Temple of Darwin fanatics, but they insist on legislating from the bench. It is now time to launch a political crusade against activist judges, and those who appoint them, until such time as we achieve a complete separation of religious Darwinism and state. In the end, that will mean not one red cent of public money going to fund Temple of Darwin fanatics like you.


121 posted on 08/25/2008 1:55:28 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 120 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
Using the political process is force

Backing off of the threats now because you are afraid of getting banned? No "evo" , as you call them, is afraid of you or your movement. Science always wins in a copetition with superstition. The Caatholic Church and the Methodists have adopted evolution as consistent with their concepts of Christianity. The Baptists will follow. You may be the last guy shouting "the moon is made of green cheese!", but nobody will be listening.

122 posted on 08/25/2008 2:04:09 AM PDT by Soliton (> 100)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Soliton

==Backing off of the threats now because you are afraid of getting banned?

I’m not afraid of being banned, because I never issued PHYSICAL threats to anyone. That makes you a LIAR. Not that lying matters in light of your Darwiniac religion.


123 posted on 08/25/2008 2:08:46 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Soliton

==Science always wins in a copetition with superstition.

If that’s the case, then the Temple of Darwin should come crumbling down any time now.


124 posted on 08/25/2008 2:10:12 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Soliton
==The Caatholic Church and the Methodists have adopted evolution as consistent with their concepts of Christianity.

Only liberal mainline denominations fall for your phony religion. How the Catholic Church will ultimately come down on this issue remains to be seen. But I did take note of the fact that the Pope fired the priest who was in charge of the Vatican observatory for criticizing Intelligent Design and saying it shouldn't be taught in school. Good for the Pope!

125 posted on 08/25/2008 2:18:50 AM PDT by GodGunsGuts
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 122 | View Replies]

To: Glenn

Certainly is too bad. Faith and science should not be incompatible.


126 posted on 08/25/2008 4:40:37 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

I was interested in the debate up until this point. That last comment decided me as to which side was in the right.


127 posted on 08/25/2008 4:56:17 AM PDT by Vanders9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts
PS Interesting that you would openly identify with an overtly left-wing source like Wikipedia on your profile page. That speaks volumes about where you’re coming from, newbie.

Thanks, newbie!

128 posted on 08/25/2008 5:09:30 AM PDT by Crankologist (See my profile page for my "All-Around Crank Index" scoring system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 94 | View Replies]

To: UndauntedR
By your scale, I got a +65 for that comment. What say you?

Like shooting fish in a barrel.

129 posted on 08/25/2008 5:17:14 AM PDT by Crankologist (See my profile page for my "All-Around Crank Index" scoring system.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 92 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

The Evos are scared of falsifiability.

BTW, why was FR down yesterday?


130 posted on 08/25/2008 5:38:38 AM PDT by Titus Quinctius Cincinnatus (Here they come boys! As thick as grass, and as black as thunder!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Soliton

We feel exactly the same way about those of you that claim “inconsistencies” in the bible.

You cut and paste the “40 inconsistencies”; we painstakingly research and answer them, and then you, instead of considering the answers, dismiss them out of hand.

The fool says in his heart, “There is no God.”


131 posted on 08/25/2008 5:39:32 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 111 | View Replies]

To: guitarplayer1953

More to the point,

we know for a fact that a biology teacher bringing up these questions about evolution would be fired, sued by the ACLU, and ostracized from the teaching/scientific community.


132 posted on 08/25/2008 5:40:48 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

FA Hayek -

one of the greatest paradoxes of collectivist thought is the reliance on reason as the justification for collectivism,

while the implementation of collectivism destroys the development of reason by forcefully excluding dissenting viewpoints.


133 posted on 08/25/2008 5:44:46 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: rawcatslyentist
Does right or wrong depend on the number of people whom believe it?

no, nor does it depend on the calendar date, basically one and the same argument.

"You can't hold that viewpoint in today's society!"

The objective truth, and objective morality, have not EVER changed, and existed before anything material existed.

134 posted on 08/25/2008 5:46:55 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: From many - one.
It seems to me that is fairly simple. Learn the basics, then if you so desire, go on and study more, then challenge whatever you then disagree with.

Ah, yes, very simple indeed. Let the authority figure indoctrinate your kids, and the kids of others who are a blank slate due to lack of training in the home (or trust in the authorities),

THEN, if you desire to do extra work to counter the initial indoctrination, research the dissenting viewpoints.

135 posted on 08/25/2008 5:49:53 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman
As long as you are threatening violence

Wiley, you seem to lack a basic misunderstanding of what it means to use the government to back your position, which you currently do.

Go against the government's will, and an armed agent of that gov't shows up to enforce that will.

You're not a conservative/classical liberal, are you? You'd understand this if so.

136 posted on 08/25/2008 5:53:08 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: Coyoteman
As long as you are threatening violence

OOOPS. DOUBLE NEGATIVE TYPO.

Wiley, you seem to lack a basic misunderstanding of what it means to use the government to back your position, which you currently do.

Go against the government's will, and an armed agent of that gov't shows up to enforce that will.

You're not a conservative/classical liberal, are you? You'd understand this if so.

137 posted on 08/25/2008 5:54:17 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 96 | View Replies]

To: wintertime
The solution is to fund the child. Allow the parents to send the child to a private school of their choice.

I used to have this position, but have you EVER heard of a government funded program, besides welfare, that didn't have strings.

You couldn't count down from 10 before a leftist would be attaching regulations about what kind of school "qualifies".

138 posted on 08/25/2008 5:58:16 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: GodGunsGuts

The sleepless nights aren’t caused, directly, by the collapse of Darwinist theory.

It’s the alternative that causes sleepless nights for folks like this.

There is a Creator, He’s Good, and more frighteningly, He’s _JUST_.

That means your behavior will be judged, and you know that there is no way to be good enough. And you also know that that one thing that you hold so dear is not pleasing to Him, and you would have to give it up if you admit that He exists.


139 posted on 08/25/2008 6:02:00 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: AndrewC

Amazing, isn’t it, that we didn’t have the commie ACLU around to sue all aspects of religion out of our country in the first 200 years,

and for some reason, we didn’t become a dreaded “theocracy”.

And more to the point, it can be tracked that the removal of the “theocratic” elements from schools was the start of an exponential increase in ALL negative social indicators.


140 posted on 08/25/2008 6:05:40 AM PDT by MrB (You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 83 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 101-120121-140141-160 ... 441-446 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson