Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rare Microorganism That Produces Hydrogen May Be Key To Tomorrow's Hydrogen Economy
www.sciencedaily.com ^ | 08 July 2008 | Adapted from materials provided by Virginia Tech.

Posted on 07/08/2008 6:58:10 AM PDT by Red Badger

An ancient organism from the pit of a collapsed volcano may hold the key to tomorrow's hydrogen economy. Scientists from across the world have formed a team to unlock the process refined by a billions-year old archaea. The U.S. Department of Energy Joint Genome Institute will expedite the research by sequencing the hydrogen-producing organism for comparative genomics.

When members of the Russian Academy of Sciences isolated a rare archaeal microorganism that breaks down cellulose and produces hydrogen, Biswarup Mukhopadhyay, an assistant professor with the Virginia Bioinformatics Institute at Virginia Tech, saw an opportunity to open a door for development of a cellulose-based high-temperature hydrogen production process. “Hydrogen can be easily converted to electrical and mechanical energy without any production of carbon dioxide,” said Mukhopadhyay, whose lab specializes in very high temperature or hyperthermophilic archaea and in energy production.

Elizaveta Bonch-Osmolovskaya and her colleagues at the Winogradsky Institute of Microbiology of the Russian Academy of Sciences discovered the rare archaeon that can chew up cellulose and exhale hydrogen. They found Desulfurococcus fermentans in the Uzon Caldera on the Kamchatka Peninsula, an isolated spit of land in eastern Siberia that is full of volcanoes and their remnants. D. fermentans degrades cellulose from the higher plants that fall in the caldera. Meanwhile, this renegade archaeon’s four closest relatives do not degrade cellulose or make hydrogen, Bonch-Osmolovskaya wrote in the February 2005 edition of the International Journal of Systematic and Evolutionary Microbiology. Like most such organisms, these relatives reduce sulfur to hydrogen sulfide (think rotten eggs).

“Since hydrogen blocks the growth for most fermenting archaea, they rarely produce hydrogen,” said Mukhopadhyay. “But D. fermentans is not bothered by hydrogen. We want to discover why

(Excerpt) Read more at sciencedaily.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Russia
KEYWORDS: auto; biofuel; catastrophism; energy; fuel; thomasgold
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 07/08/2008 6:58:11 AM PDT by Red Badger
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Uncledave

Hydrogen ping!.........


2 posted on 07/08/2008 6:58:38 AM PDT by Red Badger (If we drill deep enough, we can reach the Saudi oil fields from THIS side..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Learning to control the mechanisms of life will have a bigger impact than controlling the atom....X1000.


3 posted on 07/08/2008 7:02:08 AM PDT by DManA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
“Hydrogen can be easily converted to electrical and mechanical energy without any production of carbon dioxide,”

But isn't water vapor an even bigger greenhouse gas?

4 posted on 07/08/2008 7:02:59 AM PDT by sionnsar (trad-anglican.faithweb.com |Iran Azadi| 5yst3m 0wn3d - it's N0t Y0ur5 (SONY) | UN: Useless Nations)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
... cellulose-based high-temperature hydrogen production process ...

The high temperature part of this may still mean that production of hydrogen still consumes more energy that the hydrogen product provides.

5 posted on 07/08/2008 7:04:19 AM PDT by The_Victor (If all I want is a warm feeling, I should just wet my pants.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

If the scientists are good, the by-product will be beer.


6 posted on 07/08/2008 7:06:29 AM PDT by Cold Heart
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
“Hydrogen can be easily converted to electrical and mechanical energy without any production of carbon dioxide,”

When the cellulose is broken down to produce the hydrogen, what happens to the carbon? For every Kilogram of hydrogen in cellulose, there is 7.2 kg of carbon.

7 posted on 07/08/2008 7:09:15 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
They found Desulfurococcus fermentans in the Uzon Caldera on the Kamchatka Peninsula, an isolated spit of land in eastern Siberia

Allow me to be the first to link this to the Tunguska Event of 1908.

8 posted on 07/08/2008 7:10:57 AM PDT by ClearCase_guy (Et si omnes ego non)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: thackney

I’d assume that the organism uses the carbon for building its own structure reproducing itself.............


9 posted on 07/08/2008 7:12:14 AM PDT by Red Badger (If we drill deep enough, we can reach the Saudi oil fields from THIS side..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heart

Hydrogen bubbles in your beer?.........NO SMOKING!................


10 posted on 07/08/2008 7:13:32 AM PDT by Red Badger (If we drill deep enough, we can reach the Saudi oil fields from THIS side..........)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Cold Heart
If the scientists are good, the by-product will be beer.

Well, they might be able to use the hydrogen to make beer fizzy, without carbonation. However, I suspect the desire is to produce large quantities of hydrogen for fuel cells.

11 posted on 07/08/2008 7:13:50 AM PDT by Alter Kaker (Gravitation is a theory, not a fact. It should be approached with an open mind...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar
But isn't water vapor an even bigger greenhouse gas?

Bingo!

12 posted on 07/08/2008 7:14:21 AM PDT by cookcounty (Obama reach across the aisle? He's so far to the left, he'll need a roadmap to FIND the aisle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Now suppose we produce Hydrogen by the quadzillion cubic foot per year. Some of that Hydrogen is going to escape, and go into the upper reaches of the atmosphere and even be lost into space, since it is so light. Then the oxygen that would normally be bound to that hydrogen will be left sitting around with nothing to do.

So, what is going to have a greater effect on life and the environment, elevated inert CO2 or hightly reactive Oxygen?


13 posted on 07/08/2008 7:15:48 AM PDT by gridlock (Al Gore wants YOU to live like the Flintstones while HE lives like the Jetsons.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar

Did anyone figure the effect of all that new water vapor?


14 posted on 07/08/2008 7:16:20 AM PDT by bmwcyle (If God wanted us to be Socialist, Karl Marx would have been born in America.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger
Biswarup Mukhopadhyay

This guy's name even sounds like a digestive process....

15 posted on 07/08/2008 7:16:50 AM PDT by r9etb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

Wow.

This is a highly significant finding.


16 posted on 07/08/2008 7:18:09 AM PDT by djf (I don't believe in perpetual motion. Perpetual mutton, that's another thing entirely!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sionnsar
But isn't water vapor an even bigger greenhouse gas?

Shhhh!!! You'll spoil all the fun! 

17 posted on 07/08/2008 7:19:52 AM PDT by Redcloak ("Yes, I have been drinking. Why do you ask?" #1 on the list of "Things heard from McCain voters")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: bmwcyle
Did anyone figure the effect of all that new water vapor?

Isn't water vapor the mother of all greenhouse gasses?

18 posted on 07/08/2008 7:20:17 AM PDT by NeoCaveman (Now get out there and spread some liberty.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Red Badger

I would not make such an assumption.

It seems to me an article claiming a reduction in Carbon Dioxide output via this method would at least give a clue where the carbon goes.

If consumed by the organism, does it grow forever larger? Or does it cycle and die off. If it dies, what happens to the carbon as the organism breaks down.

This is the same fallacy of using trees as a carbon sink. Only if the lumber is harvest and forever kept intact is the carbon contained. If the wood eventually rots, the carbon is released as Carbon Dioxide.


19 posted on 07/08/2008 7:21:14 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: gridlock

The source of the Oxygen in cellulose is first pulled from the air and water. It is only cycling that which already exists.


20 posted on 07/08/2008 7:23:16 AM PDT by thackney (life is fragile, handle with prayer)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson