Skip to comments.
D.C. Officials Weigh Making Semiautomatic Pistols Illegal
FoxNews ^
| Monday, July 07, 2008
| Greg Simmons
Posted on 07/07/2008 10:32:35 AM PDT by Joiseydude
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-117 next last
To: Joiseydude
Make DC officials illegal........
41
posted on
07/07/2008 11:08:17 AM PDT
by
rrrod
To: Yo-Yo
"Are they going to ban speedloaders, too?"
Nah, they'll just stipulate that all revolvers have to be Colt SSA style and not have a swing out cylinder. Probably have to have the firing pin on the hammer too...
To: Joiseydude
What part of
shall not be infringed
don't they understand?
43
posted on
07/07/2008 11:08:35 AM PDT
by
wastedyears
(Obama is a Texas Post Turtle.)
To: Red Badger
How big is that wheel gun?
44
posted on
07/07/2008 11:09:32 AM PDT
by
wastedyears
(Obama is a Texas Post Turtle.)
To: Joiseydude
It seemed to me that the Heller decision left it wide open for government to regulate to their heart’s content - they just can’t ban handguns outright. So if they want to pass laws that state only single-shot pistols of less than .25 caliber will be allowed they can do that. That there will be litigation over this is of no great concern. Government has money to burn and plenty of time.
Just wait until B. Hussain Obama takes office with a filibuster-proof senate and a court packed with leftists.
45
posted on
07/07/2008 11:10:07 AM PDT
by
scory
To: Joiseydude
This is a brilliant ploy by General Lanier.
46
posted on
07/07/2008 11:12:01 AM PDT
by
xDGx
To: smoketree
Liberals and other knee-jerk anti-fireams types think the “auto” stands for auto-firing. You load it, set it on a table and it just starts shooting... automatically, all by itself. They are clueless that auto means auto-loading when referring to fireams similar to the venerable M1911A1 and subsequent variants that automatically chamber a round. Freepers already know these things so I’m preaching to the choir.
47
posted on
07/07/2008 11:12:32 AM PDT
by
SpaceBar
To: Beagle8U
I think I see what they’re getting at here.
I talked to a family member not too long ago that bemoaned the availability of “semi-automatic rifles” -
it was clear when I challenged him to define the term that he thought it meant “select-fire”.
I’m betting these hoplophobic gun illiterates are making the same connection in their minds.
48
posted on
07/07/2008 11:16:54 AM PDT
by
MrB
(You can't reason people out of a position that they didn't use reason to get into in the first place)
To: Joiseydude
Mateba, semi-auto revolver
49
posted on
07/07/2008 11:19:42 AM PDT
by
umgud
To: Perdogg
You know, the idea that somehow McCain is going to be better at nominating judges is nothing more than a fantasy of the self-deluded.
To: MrB
I think they know exactly what they are but they just want to ban everything they can get away with.
51
posted on
07/07/2008 11:23:13 AM PDT
by
Beagle8U
(FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
To: Beagle8U
Actually, I’ve NEVER had a revolver get out of time. I own about 8 of them.
I HAVE had semi-autos “jam”, on several occasions. I own about 6 them.
Also, if a round mis-fires in a (double-action) revolver all you have to do is pull the trigger again. A mis-fire in (most, if not all) semi-autos requires that the slide be racked in order to fire the weapon.
I like ALL my guns, but I have to agree that revolvers are stone reliable and that they TEND to be more accurate than semi-autos.
PS - This should in NO way be interpreted as support for banning ANY class of firearm.
52
posted on
07/07/2008 11:24:21 AM PDT
by
WayneS
(Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
To: Old Teufel Hunden
Nah, they'll just stipulate that all revolvers have to be Colt SSA style and not have a swing out cylinder.
lol...
You're closer to the truth than you realize. Since they had success with the sport pilot problem they see a loophole that can be used in other venues. They just enacted a new rule. Ultralight aircraft and pilots need no registration nor license. Your right to fly without government interference is "protected" while you are limited to turn of the century aircraft.
53
posted on
07/07/2008 11:27:18 AM PDT
by
radioman
To: Lord_Calvinus
You think that President Obama will nominate better judges? Why?
54
posted on
07/07/2008 11:30:55 AM PDT
by
Ramius
(Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
To: WayneS
I have seen lots of revolvers that had a cyl out of time and the accuracy is horrendous.
I agree that they are reliable as far as “going off” but that doesn't mean accurate.
55
posted on
07/07/2008 11:31:17 AM PDT
by
Beagle8U
(FreeRepublic -- One stop shopping ....... Its the Conservative Super WalMart for news .)
To: B Knotts
Actually, given how obviously unconstitutional this would be, I would guess it would be prevented from going into affect either at the trial or appellate level.Obviously unconstitutional?????Regardless, if the DC leaders pass a law, it goes into effect and stays in effect until some court (ultimately the Supremes - MAYBE) throw it out. A good liberal judge can make this law go into effect and STAY in effect until two or three or more years down the road, it is "found" unconstitutional by the Supremes - assuming Obama hasn't stacked the court with more Liberals!
56
posted on
07/07/2008 11:34:02 AM PDT
by
TexasRedeye
(Eschew obfuscation)
To: scory
My reading of the Heller decision was a little different. Yes, it allowed for some regulation but whole classes of guns that are “widely used” cannot be banned outright.
I see this as the DC politicians trying to stick their finger in Scalia’s eye, even if they know such a law won’t last. For them, it’s personal.
57
posted on
07/07/2008 11:34:25 AM PDT
by
Ramius
(Personally, I give us... one chance in three. More tea?)
To: Beagle8U
I guess I’ve just been lucky.
58
posted on
07/07/2008 11:34:58 AM PDT
by
WayneS
(Respect the 2nd Amendment; Repeal the 16th)
To: absolootezer0
"SHHHH!!!! if they ban clip fed handguns, they will hardly be banning anything. GOOD for the residents :)" Looks like the gangbangers will have to surrender their Mauser Broomhandles...
59
posted on
07/07/2008 11:35:41 AM PDT
by
Joe 6-pack
(Que me amat, amet et canem meum)
To: Lord_Calvinus
You know, the idea that somehow McCain is going to be better at nominating judges is nothing more than a fantasy of the self-deluded.Let us all remember that 7 of the 9 judges currently on the Supreme court were appointed by Republican Presidents!
60
posted on
07/07/2008 11:36:09 AM PDT
by
TexasRedeye
(Eschew obfuscation)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80 ... 101-117 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson