Posted on 05/31/2008 10:21:21 PM PDT by 2ndDivisionVet
I don’t know about PA going for McCain. I see lots of stupid white people with Obama signs in their lawns.
“white, working-class democrats will defect to mccain...”
sounds like a headline from pravda.
The trouble with making race the defining attribute of a candidate is that is what the whole race becomes. Obama has no one to blame but his campaign.
We might very well have a President who happens to be black but we will never have an African American President.
By defining himself as African American when he is half white makes people believe Obama thinks that you have to choose between being White or Black. He chose to be African American 20 years ago and chose to marry a woman who is very angry at the white Community.
White people are afraid to say it but they will vote it - either by staying home or voting against him. The fear is Obama is making this a Race based nation giving special rights to Blacks only. They will have a special status not enjoyed by any other minority or majority.
“Hopefully New York and Pennsylvania will go to McCain.
IMy theory also extends to Ohio and Michigan.”
New York, never.
Pennsylvania, good chance.
New York is now like Vermont and Massachusetts - reaching the point where they will never “vote Republican” again for ANY candidate for national office (senator, representatives, president). Yes, there are a _few_ conservative congressional districts in NY state, and that’s why we still see a few Pubbie representatives coming out of there. But senators, presidents? No mas. Even Spitzer got something like 70% of the vote, statewide.
Republicans are in deep doo-doo in Ohio this year, but there is a chance that McCain might still pull off a victory there. I will go so far as to say that in this time when conservatives are complaining about McCain’s leanings, that he is the ONLY Republican who will have had the chance to win Ohio, precisely because of his “maverick” and “independent” image. We’ll have to wait and see.
- John
“I disagreed with Rush who wanted Hillary to get the nod. To me, Obama was the weakling.”
Rush didn’t want Hillary to get the nod. The whole idea was to stretch out the race to the convention. CHAOS
Yeah, I don’t know if I’ll vote for him for that reason. I just think its funny because it shows he really is a dem.
What about if Obama is forced to take HRC as vice president? I am scared of this ticket.
From Dreams of My Father, “ I FOUND A SOLACE IN NURSING A PERVASIVE SENSE OF GRIEVANCE AND ANIMOSITY AGAINST MY MOTHER’S RACE”.
From ‘Dreams of my Father’, “THE EMOTION BETWEEN THE RACES COULD NEVER BE PURE...THE OTHER RACE WOULD ALWAYS REMAIN JUST THAT; MENACING, ALIEN AND APART.”
From ‘Dreams of My Father’,
“I CEASED TO ADVERTISE MY MOTHER’S RACE AT THE AGE OF 12 OR 13, WHEN I BEGAN TO SUSPECT THAT BY DOING SO I WAS INGRATIATING MYSELF TO WHITES.”
From Dreams Of My Father, “NEVER EMULATE THE WHITE MEN and brown men whose fates didn’t speak to my own. IT WAS INTO MY FATHER’S IMAGE, THE BLACK MAN, SON OF AFRICA, THAT I’D PACKED ALL THE ATTRIBUTES I SOUGHT IN MYSELF”.
From Dreams Of My Father:
“THAT HATE HADN’T GONE AWAY,” he wrote, BLAMING “WHITE PEOPLE— some cruel, some IGNORANT, sometimes a single face, sometimes just a faceless image of a system claiming power over our lives.”
From Dreams Of My Father;
“There were enough of us on campus to constitute a tribe, and when it came to hanging out many of us chose to function like a tribe, staying close together, traveling in packs,” he wrote. “IT REMAINED NECESSARY TO PROVE WHICH SIDE YOU WERE ON, TO SHOW YOUR LOYALTY TO THE BLACK MASSES, TO STRIKE OUT, AND NAME NAMES. “
From Dreams Of My Father, “I HAD GROWN ACCUSTOMED , everywhere, TO SUSPICIONS BETWEEN THE RACES.”
.
Forgot to give source for racist quotes in Husseins’s books.
http://www.examiner.com/a-534540~Can_a_past_of_Islam_change_the_path_to_president_for_Obama_.html?cid=dc-article-obama
.
http://www.examiner.com/a-536474~_Trapped_between_two_worlds_.html
If she ran as a 3rd Party candidate and had the numbers going in high enough to scare the Obama-ites she would be functioning like Perot did, and probably “throw’ the election to McCain, who would likely have won anyway. It’s six of one, half-dozen of another. The Dem Establishment, which she and Bill in effect “ruled” until just recently, is going to have to decide on their own that they were foolish to have rolled the dice and picked Obama as the “New Clinton”> I do think they made a terrible mistake, and said so over and over on FR since the first big Obama “surge” had everybody stunned. THey are now in the unenviable position of looking at the near future and seeing that it may be “closer” than they wanted it to be.
They know if they continue (with the tacit approval and active help of the MSM of course) to keep promoting Obama as the “heir apparent”, that the negatives about him will probably keep rolling in, and there will be MORE defection to McCain by die-hard Hillary supporters, and that makes it even MORE unlikely that Obama would ever win the Presidency. SO-—just how badly DO the Dems want the Presidency? They are getting a clearer picture every day , like it’s an image slowly coming into focus in the developer bath in the darkroom: Obama is no sure thing. Obama will ENSURE a McCain victory. Should we find a way to get back to certifying Hillary? How can the superdelegates explain their reversal and justify throwing Obama under the bus, when all the propaganda has been directed toward christening Obama with the kind of “inevitability” HRC (and THEY!) thought was hers and theirs just 6-8 months ago??) The picture is coming clearer to me now, that a nice double whammy would be McCain picking HRC for his VEEP, but to do that would be to broadcast that he is indeed the RINO most of us think he is. It would however ENSURE he would win over Obama.
It won’t happen but it is logical that it could. SO, what would eventuate from that scenario? Everything will have come full circle again:The Dem Establishment , seeing the prospect of total defeat, would disentangle Hillary from her new identity as a McCain veep, and find a way to anoint her as THEIR candidate, with Obama perhaps as HER VEEP choice. SHE certainly wouldn’t want this, any more than McCain would want her as HIS Veep. But stranger compromises have happened in the back rooms, and figuring out how this story could run its course, is a lot of fun.
*************************
HAVING said ALL THAT, I am just remembering now a dream I had last night (I just rolled out of bed 30 minutes ago)-——I am on a city street, very alive with the buzz of hundreds of people-—some political event or other is currently taking place, and I am making my way to it-—I look up and notice Teddy Kennedy, looking huge, and wrapped in flowing garments, is making his way down the middle of the street, by himself, probably on his way to his car.....I am shocked to see him, especially by himself, so soon after the terrible news about him was released. A rush of sympathy overcomes me and I want to acknowledge that I see him , so I yell out “Senator Kennedy!!! without even turning to look at me, he replies in a loud bellowing emphatic voice “NEVER MIND!!!!!!!”
-——maybe there’s a symbolic lesson there for all of the
above, and what’s going on in this weirdest of “election cycles”.
They have the same fears about Hillary, too.
We just might be incredibly lucky this year. With a poor economy, controversial war, and highly unpopular President, we should be headed for a shelllacking. But the DemocRATS then proceeded to rally around the most unappealing, radical candidates they could find. We could hold the White House in spite of everything.
It would be the mother of all bullet dodges. However we can do it.
Check his commencement speech at Wesleyan Univeristy - Major Marxist Themes abound, wake up My Beloved America - before it is too late!!!!!! He basically wants us to give up being the idividual and do and live for the collective good. Yes, this fraud asks us to sacrifice why he and his family live a in a grand abode in Chicago and off of Rezko’s dirty money!!!!!!!!/Just Asking - seoul62......
All right!!!!
Sounds like 1948 in reverse. Truman has dismal approval ratings and everyone was sick and tired of Democrats running the White House for years, so it was assumed the GOP would easily take back the White House just as they had solid gains in Congress two years earlier as a backlash against Truman.
Then Dewey and the GOP managed to screw it up and run the worst campaign possible after a bitter primary fight. Dewey wasn't worried, he gave vague speeches calling for "change" and acted like he was a shoo-in. The result, as we all know, was a big Dem upset by the time November rolled around.
So of the three Dhimocrats in the race, we might get the least marxist. A small victory I suppose.
And if Obama loses in the general, there will still be riots in the streets.
What a perfect statement, where did you find that from Steele. No one could have put it better and so succinctly
That works for me.
http://online.wsj.com/article/SB120579535818243439.html
He wrote this WSJ oped in March, sorry I should have posted the link with the quote.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.