Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Melting glaciers may release DDT and contaminate Antarctic environment
topnews.in ^ | May 27, 2008 | Mohit Joshi

Posted on 05/27/2008 11:11:48 AM PDT by PROCON

Washington, May 27 : A new study by scientists has suggested that the melting of the Antarctic glaciers might be leading to the release of large amounts of the banned pesticide DDT, which is contaminating the environment in Antarctica.

In the study, scientist Heidi N. Geisz and colleagues estimate that up to 2.0 - 8.8 pounds of DDT are released into coastal waters annually along the Western Antarctic Ice Sheet from glacial meltwater.

The researchers point out that DDT reaches Antarctica by long-range atmospheric transport in snow, and then gets concentrated in the food chain.

DDT has been banned in the northern hemisphere and has been regulated worldwide since the 1970s.

However, Geisz found that DDT levels in the Adelie penguin have been unchanged since the 1970s, despite an 80 percent reduction in global use.

According to scientists, global warming may explain that contradiction.

As the annual winter temperature on the Antarctic Peninsula has increased by about 10 degrees Fahrenheit in the last 30 years, glaciers have retreated.

The possibility that glacial meltwater has contaminated Antarctic organisms with DDT, according to the study, has compelling consequences if global warming should continue and intensify. (ANI)


TOPICS: Culture/Society; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: antarctica; ddt; environment; globalwarming; junkscience
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

1 posted on 05/27/2008 11:11:48 AM PDT by PROCON
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Arrgh!

The sky is... melting!


2 posted on 05/27/2008 11:12:49 AM PDT by PetroniusMaximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xcamel; steelyourfaith; Tolerance Sucks Rocks

Ping!


3 posted on 05/27/2008 11:13:16 AM PDT by PROCON (Hillary '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

What a pant load.


4 posted on 05/27/2008 11:15:43 AM PDT by Patrick1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
These people are just pathetic!

I guess that they holding back on their "all-in" story, i.e. that global warming will melt poor children's ice cream cones, until they really need it.

5 posted on 05/27/2008 11:15:44 AM PDT by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #6 Removed by Moderator

To: PROCON

Hey farmer farmer
Put away that d.d.t. now
Give me spots on my apples
But leave me the birds and the bees
Please!
Dont it always seem to go
That you dont know what youve got
Till its gone
They paved paradise
And put up a parking lot

*eyes rolling*


7 posted on 05/27/2008 11:23:10 AM PDT by hoe_cake
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
THE ACQUITTAL OF CARBON DIOXIDE
by Jeffrey A. Glassman, PhD

ABSTRACT:

"Carbon dioxide in the atmosphere is the product of oceanic respiration due to the well-known but under-appreciated solubility pump. Carbon dioxide rises out of warm ocean waters where it is added to the atmosphere. There it is mixed with residual and accidental CO2, and circulated, to be absorbed into the sink of the cold ocean waters. Next the thermohaline circulation carries the CO2-rich sea water deep into the ocean. A millennium later it appears at the surface in warm waters, saturated by lower pressure and higher temperature, to be exhausted back into the atmosphere. Throughout the past 420 millennia, comprising four interglacial periods, the Vostok record of atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration is imprinted with, and fully characterized by, the physics of the solubility of CO2 in water, along with the lag in the deep ocean circulation.

Notwithstanding that carbon dioxide is a greenhouse gas, atmospheric carbon dioxide has neither caused nor amplified global temperature increases. Increased carbon dioxide has been an effect of global warming, not a cause. Technically, carbon dioxide is a lagging proxy for ocean temperatures. When global temperature, and along with it, ocean temperature rises, the physics of solubility causes atmospheric CO2 to increase.

If increases in carbon dioxide, or any other greenhouse gas, could have in turn raised global temperatures, the positive feedback would have been catastrophic. While the conditions for such a catastrophe were present in the Vostok record from natural causes, the runaway event did not occur. Carbon dioxide does not accumulate in the atmosphere."

http://www.rocketscientistsjournal.com/2006/10/co2_acquittal.html

_______________________________________________________________

The graph above represents temperature and CO2 levels over the past 400,000 years. It is the same exact data Al Gore and the rest of the man-made global warmers refer to. The blue line is temps, the red CO2 levels. The deep valleys represent 4 separate glaciation periods. Now look very carefully at this relationship between temps and CO2 levels and keep in mind that Gore claims this data is the 'proof' that CO2 has warmed the earth in the past. But does the graph indeed show this? Nope. In fact, rising CO2 levels all throughout this 400,000 year period actually lagged behind temperature increases ...by an average of 800 years! So it couldn't have been CO2 that got Earth out of these 4 past glaciations. Yet Gore dishonestly and continually claims otherwise.-ETL

_______________________________________________________________


"The above chart shows the range of global temperature through the last 500 million years. There is no statistical correlation between the level of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere through the last 500 million years and the temperature record in this interval. In fact, one of the highest levels of carbon dioxide concentration occurred during a major ice age that occurred about 450 million years ago. Carbon dioxide concentrations at that time were about 15 times higher than at present.":
http://www.tcsdaily.com/article.aspx?id=010405M

_______________________________________________________________

FWD:

So, greenhouse [effect] is all about carbon dioxide, right?

Wrong. The most important players on the greenhouse stage are water vapor and clouds. Carbon dioxide has been increased to about 0.038% of the atmosphere (possibly from about 0.028% pre-Industrial Revolution) while water in its various forms ranges from 0% to 4% of the atmosphere and its properties vary by what form it is in and even at what altitude it is found in the atmosphere.

In simple terms the bulk of Earth's greenhouse effect is due to water vapor by virtue of its abundance. Water accounts for about 90% of the Earth's greenhouse effect -- perhaps 70% is due to water vapor and about 20% due to clouds (mostly water droplets), some estimates put water as high as 95% of Earth's total tropospheric greenhouse effect (e.g., Freidenreich and Ramaswamy, 'Solar Radiation Absorption by Carbon Dioxide, Overlap with Water, and a Parameterization for General Circulation Models,' Journal of Geophysical Research 98 (1993):7255-7264).

The remaining portion comes from carbon dioxide, nitrous oxide, methane, ozone and miscellaneous other 'minor greenhouse gases.' As an example of the relative importance of water it should be noted that changes in the relative humidity on the order of 1.3-4% are equivalent to the effect of doubling CO2.

http://www.junkscience.com/Greenhouse/

_______________________________________________________________

FWD:

Water Vapor Rules the Greenhouse System

Water vapor constitutes Earth's most significant greenhouse gas, accounting for about 95% of Earth's greenhouse effect (4). Interestingly, many 'facts and figures' regarding global warming completely ignore the powerful effects of water vapor in the greenhouse system, carelessly (perhaps, deliberately) overstating human impacts as much as 20-fold.

Water vapor is 99.999% of natural origin. Other atmospheric greenhouse gases, carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), nitrous oxide (N2O), and miscellaneous other gases (CFC's, etc.), are also mostly of natural origin (except for the latter, which is mostly anthropogenic).

Human activites contribute slightly to greenhouse gas concentrations through farming, manufacturing, power generation, and transportation. However, these emissions are so dwarfed in comparison to emissions from natural sources we can do nothing about, that even the most costly efforts to limit human emissions would have a very small-- perhaps undetectable-- effect on global climate.

http://www.geocraft.com/WVFossils/greenhouse_data.html

8 posted on 05/27/2008 11:23:52 AM PDT by ETL
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

These nutbags must lay awake at night thinking this tripe up.


9 posted on 05/27/2008 11:24:09 AM PDT by jazusamo (DefendOurMarines.org | DefendOurTroops.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Lions and tigers and bears ...


10 posted on 05/27/2008 11:24:48 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

(oh my)


11 posted on 05/27/2008 11:25:02 AM PDT by Sgt_Schultze
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON
A new study by scientists...

Define: scientists

12 posted on 05/27/2008 11:25:07 AM PDT by Puppage (You may disagree with what I have to say, but I shall defend to your death my right to say it)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

Are they also discovering all those people missing from Paul Ehrlich’s book “The Population Bomb”? The ones that were going to allow each of us only 1 sq foot of land by the late 80’s.


13 posted on 05/27/2008 11:25:21 AM PDT by w1andsodidwe (Jimmy Carter(the Godfather of Terror) allowed radical Islam to get a foothold in Iran.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON; Killing Time; Beowulf; Mr. Peabody; RW_Whacko; honolulugal; SideoutFred; Ole Okie; ...


FReepmail me to get on or off
Click on POGW graphic for full GW rundown
Dr. John Ray's
GREENIE WATCH


un-friggin-believeible
14 posted on 05/27/2008 11:25:28 AM PDT by xcamel (Being on the wrong track means the unintended consequences express train doesnt kill you going by)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

“However, Geisz found that DDT levels in the Adelie penguin have been unchanged since the 1970s, despite an 80 percent reduction in global use.”

ergo, it must be globull warming.

Have these people no shame????


15 posted on 05/27/2008 11:26:46 AM PDT by bereanway (Hunter in '08)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

DDT in melting polar ice? hey, at least we won’t have a mosquito problem with all that melted, stagnant polar ice-water...


16 posted on 05/27/2008 11:27:49 AM PDT by PGR88
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON; cogitator

And the author of the article does not say anything about what detrimental effects penguins and other Antarctic fauna are suffering from the DDT contamination. Which begs the question: why should we worry?


17 posted on 05/27/2008 11:28:17 AM PDT by Tolerance Sucks Rocks (To the liberal, there's no sacrifice too big for somebody else to make. --FReeper popdonnelly)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

But on the upside, there will be no more mosquitoes in Anarctica.


18 posted on 05/27/2008 11:28:29 AM PDT by mikeus_maximus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

“Remember, everyone, your seat can used as a flotation device.”

OMG, we’re all gonna die!


19 posted on 05/27/2008 11:31:47 AM PDT by RexBeach
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PROCON

AMAZING! How many enviro scares can we put into one giant environmentalist scare?

Can we have a ‘unified theory’ of environmentalist scares, and if so, wouldn’t it all point to GW Bush, Cheney and Halliburton?


20 posted on 05/27/2008 11:42:41 AM PDT by Cheesel (The Ark was built by amateurs, the Titanic by professionals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-43 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson