Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Despite high school algebra focus, more students need remedial college math
Sacramento Bee ^ | May 12, 2008 | Deb Kollars

Posted on 05/13/2008 7:03:24 AM PDT by reaganaut1

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last
To: The_Reader_David
To address the second, I’m afraid the several states need to revoke the monopoly on teacher certification given to Colleges of Education. That’s where the rot in American education is at it’s worst, not (suprisingly) in the teachers’ unions, bad though they are.

Have you read Richard Mitchell's The Graves of Academe?
81 posted on 05/13/2008 8:31:42 AM PDT by aruanan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
In addition, if students earn C's or lower in high school math courses, or if teachers grade too softly, it can lead to wider gaps.

In many schools teachers are penalized for holding students back so they just pass them through. In other schools parents complain (and win) when they complain about a teacher who has given their son/daughter a score below that which the parents think they should have.

82 posted on 05/13/2008 8:32:00 AM PDT by NCjim (The more I use Windows, the more I love UNIX)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: avacado

I just get so frustrated with these threads. Especially with the people who say that anyone who does not know algebra must not have any intelligence. I busted my butt trying to learn algebra and just never got it. I would still be in high school if there had not been some way around it. My husband says I probably just had bad teachers, but who knows.


83 posted on 05/13/2008 9:04:27 AM PDT by HungarianGypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 55 | View Replies]

To: Tammy8

My husband always said I just had bad math teachers and no one taught me how to do math right. I do basic math easily, because I just taught myself new ways to do it and and am not worrying that someone will see my work. So, maybe I’m not as stupid as I am thinking right now.


84 posted on 05/13/2008 9:07:35 AM PDT by HungarianGypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 73 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

When I was learning arithmetic in grade school, we were drilled in long addition, long subtraction, long multiplication, and long division. I could do arithmetic quite well. Everything was fine until 1963, then the school district instituted New Math. Big mistake.

New Math didn’t work. Instruction in mathematics has never been the same.

Today math teachers have so much to teach, they no long take the time to do drills, which accustom students to sit still and work those problems through and through, repeatedly until it becomes second nature.

I’ve been home teaching my nephew for three years. He now performs reading comphrehension on the college level after a disasterous grade school experience. He still dislikes to read but he can do it. Mathematics is different.

He was never drilled, mostly because he had ADD and can’t keep his attention concentrated. He’s completed Algebra I & II at home and is now onto Geometry, but he still has problems with addition, subtraction, multiplication, division, fractions, and decimals. We keep going over and over it but to no avail.

The sad part is that he is very smart, loves physics, is creative in engineering solutions, proficient with computers and wants to be an IT Administrator. To do that one must have math. We are still working at it. He may end up in one of the military branches because of his poor academic habits but enlistees are known for deciding on their future college careers quickly while in boot camp - and it ususally is NOT military related.

We’ll get through it. I couldn’t figure out Algebra and Trig until I was in my late 30s and early 40s. Some people just don’t have a mature enough brain in their teens.


85 posted on 05/13/2008 9:08:08 AM PDT by SatinDoll (Desperately desiring a conservative government.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee

Well, it’s run by nuns as a charity and that keeps the tuition way way down. Also those amounts that are spent on special ed are hugely inflated in the gubmint schools.

I don’t know their methods. I know they teach kids to read with phonics and to do math by memorization. No calculators. And they have kids with Down Syndrome, autism, and other problems reading, writing, and doing math.


86 posted on 05/13/2008 9:13:56 AM PDT by JenB
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 80 | View Replies]

To: SatinDoll

Thanks for this great post. I was beginning to think I was the only person who was not able to do algebra as a teenager.


87 posted on 05/13/2008 9:15:37 AM PDT by HungarianGypsy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 85 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
All the social engineering and multi-cultural diversity sensitivity classes are pushing the "3 R's" out of the school curriculum. Much of the basics got pushed to homework, and then homework was reduced as an extra burden on students.

Now they learning nothing.

-PJ

88 posted on 05/13/2008 9:18:44 AM PDT by Political Junkie Too (Repeal the 17th amendment -- it's the "Fairness Doctrine" for Congress!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1

IT’S THE TEXTBOOKS AND THE TEACHERS, STUPID!

If they tested California’s math teachers, they would find the same percentage as the students who couldn’t pass these tests.

There is no excuse for not being up to speed in math before college. The taxpayers paid for this site - http://www.ucopenaccess.org/ - so any student could go on line and take these open access courses as preparation for college.


89 posted on 05/13/2008 9:20:42 AM PDT by anonsquared (conte)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Eva

That’s a good point. The primary place in high school mathematics where logic and deduction are taught is in geometry. In the olden days (1970s or before, when I was in high school), this was taught similar to the ancient scheme in Euclid, where there were about five axioms or postulates from which all the theorems were deduced. You had to learn how to prove various theorems. (The usual scheme was the “two-column” proof.) But nowadays, geometry classes have lots of axioms or postulates. Most of these are theorems in the old geometry classes. The reason they do this is to make the subject simpler, easier to teach, and so the grades are higher. And the students and parents are happier. Unfortunately, parents share some of the guilt here, in the watering down of education: if a teacher gives an F, he or she may hear from irate parents. Or the coach.


90 posted on 05/13/2008 10:02:36 AM PDT by megatherium ((back to lurk mode))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: megatherium

That’s interesting about Geometry and deductive reasoning. Geometry was my favorite subject in high school, I thought it was like a brain teaser. I drove the teacher crazy because I would finish the proof before the rest of the kids had even begun. One day he made me get up and teach the class so that I would understand the difficulties that he was facing.

But, we also were taught deductive reasoning in all our sciences, right from seventh grade, and in the grade school word problems. Deductive reasoning was actually an integral part of all of our subjects, including social studies and government. There was alway the element of cause and affect and objective testing was only a small part of the evaluation process. Tests were always returned and discussed in depth because the teachers were aware that learning from mistakes often makes more of an impression than wrote memorization.


91 posted on 05/13/2008 10:15:47 AM PDT by Eva (CHANGE- the post modern euphemism for Marxist revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 90 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
Not everyone is smart enough to college.

C'mon, we're talking huge percentages that can't do basic arithmetic! That's clearly not due to a few socially promoted kids leaking through to college. The schools are failing at everything except protecting themselves. The kids are disposable to them. It's a disgrace.

92 posted on 05/13/2008 10:27:32 AM PDT by pepsi_junkie (Often wrong, but never in doubt!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: JoanneSD
as far figuring out the price per ounce of an item.. I just divided 16 into the price.

Everything you buy is a pound? What if it's a 16.6oz box of cereal at $1.83 vs. a 15.2oz box of similar cereal on sale at 3 for $5? Which one do you buy?

93 posted on 05/13/2008 11:41:20 AM PDT by dan1123 (If you want to find a person's true religion, ask them what makes them a "good person".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: JenB
I don’t know their methods. I know they teach kids to read with phonics and to do math by memorization. No calculators. And they have kids with Down Syndrome, autism, and other problems reading, writing, and doing math.

That's pretty amazing.

I'd be curious both to see them in action and to see the results.

94 posted on 05/13/2008 11:43:28 AM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee (const Tag &referenceToConstTag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 86 | View Replies]

To: The_Reader_David
The real problems are 1) that the high school curriculum still assumes that students have the sort of intuition about arithmetic that is built up by doing problems by hand, when in fact they have used calculators, and 2) that most K-8 teachers are math-phobic.

The "real" problem is that [almost] 50% of the kids these days are coming from groups which are at least a standard deviation stupider than the groups we were familiar with when we grew up.

And there's not a damned thing anyone can do about it - well, except for smart people to start making babies again.

But until smart people start making more babies than stupid people [and I know of almost no demographic data anywhere which would indicate that that is happening], the world is pretty much doomed.

Prepare for the worst, because it's coming.

95 posted on 05/13/2008 11:48:37 AM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee (const Tag &referenceToConstTag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 79 | View Replies]

To: anonsquared
IT’S THE TEXTBOOKS AND THE TEACHERS, STUPID! If they tested California’s math teachers, they would find the same percentage as the students who couldn’t pass these tests. There is no excuse for not being up to speed in math before college.

No doubt the textbooks and the teachers are pretty lousy, but the underlying problem is the students.

We just don't have any remedy for genetically dumb kids - there's nothing we can do about it - the problem is intractable.

Again, prepare for the worst.

96 posted on 05/13/2008 11:50:49 AM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee (const Tag &referenceToConstTag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 89 | View Replies]

To: Eva
Eva: How many children did you make?

And how many children did your brother make?

Our only hope [literally our ONLY HOPE] is for smart people to start making babies again.

If smart people don't make babies, then we are doomed.

97 posted on 05/13/2008 12:13:11 PM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee (const Tag &referenceToConstTag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: KayEyeDoubleDee

My brother never married. He is all rational thought, no emotion. It just wouldn’t work.


98 posted on 05/13/2008 12:49:05 PM PDT by Eva (CHANGE- the post modern euphemism for Marxist revolution.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 97 | View Replies]

To: Eva
And therein lies the problem - if guys like him don't make babies, then the population just gets stupider and stupider.

BTW, did you make any babies yourself?

99 posted on 05/13/2008 12:58:24 PM PDT by KayEyeDoubleDee (const Tag &referenceToConstTag)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 98 | View Replies]

To: reaganaut1
My thoughts in a nutshell: At some point between the late 1960’s and the early 1980’s someone decided that everyone is entitled to a college education and as a result, many colleges have become the “13th grade” for students who never would have pursued a college degree prior to 1968. If not for the entitlement mentality, many of these people would have avoided college like a STD to pursue a career in the military, building trades, auto body and mechanics, HVAC, and other occupations that are extremely important, but don't require a college degree for success.

I also believe that many of the college students who require remedial math and reading are reflections of the poor quality of the teachers in the public school system. I suspect that many of these teachers required the very type of remedial education in college that their students now require in the 13th grade. I've known many teachers over the years, and with the exception of a very few who had “the calling,” most are not the “best and the brightest” or anything close. Indeed, most of the teachers I have known over the years had SAT/ACT scores on the lower half of the bell curve. They also graduated from “less selective” teachers colleges where many of the core requirements are remedial, at least by the non-affirmative action standards at the more selective colleges and universities.

100 posted on 05/13/2008 1:13:39 PM PDT by Labyrinthos
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-104 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson