Skip to comments.
Tom Cruise's Adolf Hitler film put back into Hollywood bunker
The Sunday Times ^
| May 11, 2008
| Richard Brooks
Posted on 05/11/2008 6:57:08 AM PDT by null and void
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
To: null and void
Destined to be on a double feature with "The Day the Clown Cried".
21
posted on
05/11/2008 8:40:32 AM PDT
by
CaptainK
(...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
To: johnny7
22
posted on
05/11/2008 9:04:07 AM PDT
by
Bald Eagle777
(The US Constitution is the best political document in History. GOD BLESS THE USA!)
To: sirchtruth
I agree with you, he is a talented actor.
When I think of movies that I have enjoyed in the past a lot of them are his movies....
His weird behavior just gets in his way of many of us recognizing and admitting his talent
23
posted on
05/11/2008 9:11:07 AM PDT
by
Kimmers
To: ditto h
Of course Hitler was much taller. And probably much more intelligent.
24
posted on
05/11/2008 9:30:07 AM PDT
by
dearolddad
(Opinions are like rectums: everybody has one.)
To: Kimmers
Tom Cruze should be bagging groceries somewhere in Iowa.
Comment #26 Removed by Moderator
To: 04-Bravo; aimhigh; andyandval; Arizona Carolyn; backhoe; Bahbah; bert; bilhosty; Caipirabob; ...
27
posted on
05/11/2008 10:44:05 AM PDT
by
abb
(Organized Journalism: Marxist-style collectivism applied to information sharing)
To: null and void
They should have known. They Cruise and we snooze.
28
posted on
05/11/2008 10:52:31 AM PDT
by
DoughtyOne
(Who opposes John McCain's leftist agenda? The RNC, Rep Congress members, the Democrats? Good luck!)
To: sinanju
I'm glad you pointed out Napoleon was of average stature for his time. I wonder who's interest it has been in to portray Napoleon as short for the last 200 years.
29
posted on
05/11/2008 12:10:56 PM PDT
by
BBell
To: RichInOC
how is a movie that ends (or at least should end) with Tom Cruises character getting executed by firing squad not an automatic massive box-office hit?I'd at least rent it after it came out on DVD. I could watch the end over and over-just like "Titanic".
30
posted on
05/11/2008 12:20:16 PM PDT
by
GATOR NAVY
(Your parents will all receive phone calls instructing them to love you less now.)
To: null and void
Springtime for Hitler! That’s been done.
31
posted on
05/11/2008 6:16:59 PM PDT
by
Temple Owl
(Excelsior! Onward and upward.)
To: BBell
“After the famous general and emperor died in 1821, his body was autopsied in France, and his height was noted as 5 foot 2 inches. This measurement was in French feet (pieds de roi) and was never correctly converted to standard English measure. In English feet, Napoleon stood 5 foot 6.5 inches tall. So the poor guy was shorted a full 4.5 inches in height.
In his day, 5’6.5” was a perfectly respectable, nothing-to-be-ashamed-of height for a man. In fact, Napoleon was actually slightly taller than the average Frenchman of 1800.
So the diminutive size the emperor is so noted for was, in fact, a mere miscalculation. And as one observer points out, “It is also probable that the men of his Imperial Guard, with whom he ‘hung out,’ were very tall, creating the illusion that Napoleon was short.”
The man himself said it best — “History is a set of lies that people have agreed upon.”
___________________________________________________________________________________
From AskYahoo.
32
posted on
05/11/2008 7:17:35 PM PDT
by
sinanju
To: sinanju
So it was a miscalculation. And I always thought there was a conspiracy against him.
33
posted on
05/11/2008 8:14:13 PM PDT
by
BBell
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-33 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson