Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Tom Cruise's Adolf Hitler film put back into Hollywood bunker
The Sunday Times ^ | May 11, 2008 | Richard Brooks

Posted on 05/11/2008 6:57:08 AM PDT by null and void

The fortunes of Hollywood actor Tom Cruise have suffered a blow with the news that his next big film has been postponed until 2009.

The release of Valkyrie, which tells the story of the 1944 assassination plot against Hitler, was first postponed from this summer to the autumn and is now not expected to appear until next year.

“We were originally expecting the film to be released in June,” said a senior executive at one of Britain’s leading cinema chains.

“I know there have been all sorts of problems with this production and we will not be screening it at all this year.”

The film is not only a blow to Cruise as an actor but in his more recent incarnation as a movie mogul at United Artists (UA), the studio which made the film.

One critic in Hollywood has declared “Valkyrie is dead”, with another arguing that the film’s problems could also wreck the revival of UA.

Cruise, whose earlier career saw hit after hit with Top Gun, Rain Man and Jerry Maguire, is a stakeholder in UA, which was originally founded by Charlie Chaplin and other stars.

It has since passed through several different owners until Cruise relaunched it as a major studio in 2006.

Cruise, who is married to the actress Katie Holmes, has a minority stake with his business partner Paula Wagner, but the pair have almost total control over which films are made.

UA’s first major film, Lions for Lambs, a story about the Iraq war with Cruise and Meryl Streep starring and Robert Redford directing, flopped.

Valkyrie has been directed by Bryan Singer, who is best known for The Usual Suspects and X-Men. The new film, which was mostly shot last year at a cost of £45m, has so far left test audiences unimpressed.

The quality of Cruise’s German accent was widely commented on. The film has also had to have reshoots after footage was damaged in labs.

Cruise plays the German officer Claus von Stauffenberg, who led the plot. Other German parts are played by British actors, including Bill Nighy and Kenneth Branagh.

A flop would not be good news either for Branagh, who directed three films last year – The Magic Flute, As You Like It and Sleuth – all of which had mixed reviews.

However, Branagh has usually fared better as an actor. He won awards for the film Conspiracy in 2001, where he played the Nazi bureaucrat Reinhard Heydrich, who chaired the conference during the second world war at which the policy of exterminating Jews was decided upon.

Roger Friedman, who has a widely read film blog and a column on foxnews.com, recently advised Cruise, who was formerly married to Nicole Kidman, to “do another Jerry Maguire-like comedy” to get his acting career back on track.


TOPICS: Culture/Society
KEYWORDS: assassinationplot; hollywood; valkyrie
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: null and void
Destined to be on a double feature with "The Day the Clown Cried".
21 posted on 05/11/2008 8:40:32 AM PDT by CaptainK (...please make it stop. Shake a can of pennies at it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: johnny7

Ummmm, I think Cruise is playing the part of von Stauffenberg.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/July_20_Plot

Interesting, the Park Street Church pastor is talking about WW-II stuff right now as I write this.


22 posted on 05/11/2008 9:04:07 AM PDT by Bald Eagle777 (The US Constitution is the best political document in History. GOD BLESS THE USA!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: sirchtruth
I agree with you, he is a talented actor.

When I think of movies that I have enjoyed in the past a lot of them are his movies....

His weird behavior just gets in his way of many of us recognizing and admitting his talent

23 posted on 05/11/2008 9:11:07 AM PDT by Kimmers
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: ditto h
Of course Hitler was much taller.

And probably much more intelligent.

24 posted on 05/11/2008 9:30:07 AM PDT by dearolddad (Opinions are like rectums: everybody has one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Kimmers

Tom Cruze should be bagging groceries somewhere in Iowa.


25 posted on 05/11/2008 10:17:16 AM PDT by Shellback Chuck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

Comment #26 Removed by Moderator

To: 04-Bravo; aimhigh; andyandval; Arizona Carolyn; backhoe; Bahbah; bert; bilhosty; Caipirabob; ...

ping


27 posted on 05/11/2008 10:44:05 AM PDT by abb (Organized Journalism: Marxist-style collectivism applied to information sharing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: null and void

They should have known. They Cruise and we snooze.


28 posted on 05/11/2008 10:52:31 AM PDT by DoughtyOne (Who opposes John McCain's leftist agenda? The RNC, Rep Congress members, the Democrats? Good luck!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sinanju
I'm glad you pointed out Napoleon was of average stature for his time. I wonder who's interest it has been in to portray Napoleon as short for the last 200 years.
29 posted on 05/11/2008 12:10:56 PM PDT by BBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: RichInOC
how is a movie that ends (or at least should end) with Tom Cruise’s character getting executed by firing squad not an automatic massive box-office hit?

I'd at least rent it after it came out on DVD. I could watch the end over and over-just like "Titanic".

30 posted on 05/11/2008 12:20:16 PM PDT by GATOR NAVY (Your parents will all receive phone calls instructing them to love you less now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: null and void

Springtime for Hitler! That’s been done.


31 posted on 05/11/2008 6:16:59 PM PDT by Temple Owl (Excelsior! Onward and upward.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BBell

“After the famous general and emperor died in 1821, his body was autopsied in France, and his height was noted as 5 foot 2 inches. This measurement was in French feet (pieds de roi) and was never correctly converted to standard English measure. In English feet, Napoleon stood 5 foot 6.5 inches tall. So the poor guy was shorted a full 4.5 inches in height.

In his day, 5’6.5” was a perfectly respectable, nothing-to-be-ashamed-of height for a man. In fact, Napoleon was actually slightly taller than the average Frenchman of 1800.

So the diminutive size the emperor is so noted for was, in fact, a mere miscalculation. And as one observer points out, “It is also probable that the men of his Imperial Guard, with whom he ‘hung out,’ were very tall, creating the illusion that Napoleon was short.”

The man himself said it best — “History is a set of lies that people have agreed upon.”

___________________________________________________________________________________

From AskYahoo.


32 posted on 05/11/2008 7:17:35 PM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: sinanju
So it was a miscalculation. And I always thought there was a conspiracy against him.
33 posted on 05/11/2008 8:14:13 PM PDT by BBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson