Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sinanju
I'm glad you pointed out Napoleon was of average stature for his time. I wonder who's interest it has been in to portray Napoleon as short for the last 200 years.
29 posted on 05/11/2008 12:10:56 PM PDT by BBell
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: BBell

“After the famous general and emperor died in 1821, his body was autopsied in France, and his height was noted as 5 foot 2 inches. This measurement was in French feet (pieds de roi) and was never correctly converted to standard English measure. In English feet, Napoleon stood 5 foot 6.5 inches tall. So the poor guy was shorted a full 4.5 inches in height.

In his day, 5’6.5” was a perfectly respectable, nothing-to-be-ashamed-of height for a man. In fact, Napoleon was actually slightly taller than the average Frenchman of 1800.

So the diminutive size the emperor is so noted for was, in fact, a mere miscalculation. And as one observer points out, “It is also probable that the men of his Imperial Guard, with whom he ‘hung out,’ were very tall, creating the illusion that Napoleon was short.”

The man himself said it best — “History is a set of lies that people have agreed upon.”

___________________________________________________________________________________

From AskYahoo.


32 posted on 05/11/2008 7:17:35 PM PDT by sinanju
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson