Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

NASA Baffled by Unexplained Force Acting on Space Probes
Space.com ^ | 2/29/08 | Charles Q. Choi

Posted on 02/29/2008 5:48:51 PM PST by NormsRevenge

Mysteriously, five spacecraft that flew past the Earth have each displayed unexpected anomalies in their motions.

These newfound enigmas join the so-called "Pioneer anomaly" as hints that unexplained forces may appear to act on spacecraft.

A decade ago, after rigorous analyses, anomalies were seen with the identical Pioneer 10 and 11 spacecraft as they hurtled out of the solar system. Both seemed to experience a tiny but unexplained constant acceleration toward the sun.

A host of explanations have been bandied about for the Pioneer anomaly. At times these are rooted in conventional science — perhaps leaks from the spacecraft have affected their trajectories. At times these are rooted in more speculative physics — maybe the law of gravity itself needs to be modified.

Now Jet Propulsion Laboratory astronomer John Anderson and his colleagues — who originally helped uncover the Pioneer anomaly — have discovered that five spacecraft each raced either a tiny bit faster or slower than expected when they flew past the Earth en route to other parts of the solar system.

'Humble and perplexed'

The researchers looked at six deep-space probes — Galileo I and II to Jupiter, the NEAR mission to the asteroid Eros, the Rosetta probe to a comet, Cassini to Saturn, and the MESSENGER craft to Mercury. Each spacecraft flew past the our planet to either gain or lose orbital energy in their quests to reach their eventual targets.

In five of the six flybys, the scientists have confirmed anomalies.

"I am feeling both humble and perplexed by this," said Anderson, who is now working as a retiree. "There is something very strange going on with spacecraft motions. We have no convincing explanation for either the Pioneer anomaly or the flyby anomaly."

In the one probe the researchers did not confirm a noticeable anomaly with, MESSENGER, the spacecraft approached the Earth at about latitude 31 degrees north and receded from the Earth at about latitude 32 degrees south. "This near-perfect symmetry about the equator seemed to result in a very small velocity change, in contrast to the five other flybys," Anderson explained — so small no anomaly could be confirmed.

The five other flybys involved flights whose incoming and outgoing trajectories were asymmetrical with each other in terms of their orientation with Earth's equator.

For instance, the NEAR mission approached Earth at about latitude 20 south and receded from the planet at about latitude 72 south. The spacecraft then seemed to fly 13 millimeters per second faster than expected. While this is just one-millionth of that probe's total velocity, the precision of the velocity measurements was 0.1 millimeters per second, carried out as they were using radio waves bounced off the craft. This suggests the anomaly seen is real — and one needing an explanation.

The fact this effect seems most evident with flybys most asymmetrical with respect to Earth's equator "suggests that the anomaly is related to Earth's rotation," Anderson said.

As to whether these new anomalies are linked with the Pioneer anomaly, "I would be very surprised if we have discovered two independent spacecraft anomalies," Anderson told SPACE.com. "I suspect they are connected, but I really do not know."

Unbound idea

These anomalies might be effects we see with an object possessing a spacecraft's mass, between 660 and 2,200 lbs. (300 and 1,000 kg), Anderson speculated.

"Another thing in common between the Pioneer and these flybys is what you would call an unbound orbit around a central body," Anderson said. "For instance, the Pioneers are flying out of the solar system — they're not bound to their central body, the sun. For the other flybys, the Earth is the central body. These kinds of orbits just don't occur very often in nature — it could be when you get into an unbound orbit around a central body, something goes on that's not in our standard models."

The researchers are now collaborating with German colleagues to search for possible anomalies in the Rosetta probe's second flyby of the Earth on November 13.

"We should continue to monitor spacecraft during Earth flybys. We should look carefully at newly recovered Pioneer data for more evidence of the Pioneer anomaly," Anderson added. "We should think about launching a dedicated mission on an escape trajectory from the solar system, just to look for anomalies in its motion."

Montana State University physicist Ronald Hellings, who did not participate in this study, said, "There's definitely something going on. Whether that's because of new physics or some problem with the model we have is yet to be worked out, as far as I know. A lot of people are trying to look into this."

Anderson and his colleagues will detail their latest findings in an upcoming issue of the journal Physical Review Letters.


TOPICS: Government; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: anomalies; baffled; nasa; pioneeranomaly; spaceprobes; unexplained
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

1 posted on 02/29/2008 5:48:54 PM PST by NormsRevenge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
They miscalculated the weight?
2 posted on 02/29/2008 5:51:23 PM PST by BenLurkin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

It must have “something” to do with global warming...it MUST!


3 posted on 02/29/2008 5:52:18 PM PST by Eye On The Left
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

4 posted on 02/29/2008 5:54:11 PM PST by JennysCool (They all say they want change, but they’re really after folding money.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Weird gravitational field maybe.

Say... has anyone heard from Michael Moore lately?


5 posted on 02/29/2008 5:54:25 PM PST by ovrtaxt (Member of the irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: BenLurkin

Maybe a slight leakage of fuel from the positional thruster?


6 posted on 02/29/2008 5:54:28 PM PST by Brett66 (Where government advances, and it advances relentlessly , freedom is imperiled -Janice Rogers Brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Could be lovebugs?
7 posted on 02/29/2008 5:56:18 PM PST by BGHater ($2300 is the limit of your Free Speech.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Velikovsky!

The solar system is filled with electricity!

8 posted on 02/29/2008 5:57:22 PM PST by who_would_fardels_bear
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Could be God having a little fun! ;-)


9 posted on 02/29/2008 5:58:03 PM PST by doc1019 (God is in control ... not Global Warming.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Very interesting. Unexplained anomolies have led to some important scientific discoveries in the past. Every question raised like this begs for an answer.


10 posted on 02/29/2008 5:59:03 PM PST by -YYZ- (Strong like bull, smart like ox.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Some effects of the rotation of the Earth in conjunction with the Magnetic Field and, perhaps some irregularities in the strength of the Field on either side of the Equator?
11 posted on 02/29/2008 6:02:16 PM PST by TCats (The Clintons Are Not Just Wrong - They Are Certifiable AND Dangerous! See my Page)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: nnn0jeh

ping


12 posted on 02/29/2008 6:06:01 PM PST by kalee (The offenses we give, we write in the dust; Those we take, we write in marble. JHuett)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Interesting.
Not sure, but I believe that all of the fly-byes I’ve seen charted go with the Earth’s rotation. Is there any that have gone against it; or from pole to pole? Gravity drag?


13 posted on 02/29/2008 6:07:11 PM PST by brityank (The more I learn about the Constitution, the more I realise this Government is UNconstitutional !!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

How about just the pull of the gravity of the sun being different than they though?

I know, I know... BUSH’s fault.


14 posted on 02/29/2008 6:07:57 PM PST by A CA Guy ( God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

15 posted on 02/29/2008 6:10:12 PM PST by valkyrieanne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

Anybody track Gore’s movements with these wobbles?


16 posted on 02/29/2008 6:10:21 PM PST by leadhead (Most people can't think, most of the remainder won't think,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge


Hubble photographs show this being at the scene of every incident.

17 posted on 02/29/2008 6:10:36 PM PST by Army Air Corps (Four fried chickens and a coke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: who_would_fardels_bear
The solar system is filled with electricity!

What is the zero-point field or zero-point fluctuations(ZPF)?

What is its relationship to the quantum vacuum? In the view of modern physics, the vacuum is far from empty. Take away all particles and all electromagnetic radiation and you will have an apparently empty region of space at a temperature of absolute zero. But in fact this "vacuum" will still be full of energies and particle pairs (such as positrons and electrons): the electromagnetic zero-point field, the zero-point fields of the weak and strong interactions, and the Dirac sea of negative energy particle pairs. All of these energies and particles are collectively referred to as the quantum vacuum (making the vacuum in reality a plenum). Our work so far has involved only one component of the quantum vacuum: the electromagnetic zero-point field or zero-point fluctuations. (Henceforth, unless stated otherwise, ZPF refers only to the electromagnetic ZPF.) The ZPF was a hypothesis put forward by Max Planck in 1911, and was developed by him and Walther Nernst between 1911 and 1916. In 1947 the effect of the ZPF was directly demonstrated by Willis Lamb, in a famous experiment, which Lamb himself has described as "a proof that the vacuum does not exist" (i.e. that the "vacuum" is a "plenum"). The Casimir effect, predicted in the following year and subsequently verified, is another direct demonstration of the ZPF's reality.

Questions and Answers about the Origin of Inertia and the Zero-Point Field - From CalPhysics

18 posted on 02/29/2008 6:11:12 PM PST by Eye On The Left
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge
Gravity is the culprit. The center of gravity is really 4,000 miles above the surface of the earth. The earth itself curves inward at the poles, hidden by the polar mists.

Check this old story:

Center of Gravity

19 posted on 02/29/2008 6:12:32 PM PST by Eastbound
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: NormsRevenge

The earth is not perfectly round and its mass distribution varies due to tides, etc.


20 posted on 02/29/2008 6:12:50 PM PST by idkfa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-66 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson