Huh?
Ideology is country. Country is ideology. I personally don’t want an America that wants the 1st amendment shut down 60 days before an election; do you?
And I'm voting R, for anyone who has that beside their name, and I don't give a damn what their name is.
Huh? “Love of ideology”? You don’t make any sense. I don’t awaken every day “a slave” to my ideology. I love my country. I don’t, however, “love” the GOP or the Democrat Party, nor do I love the Libertarian or any other party.
Tell me this, KMAJ2, how can a vote for McNasty—which would compromise and go against EVERYTHING I believe in and have fought so hard for in my own way—how can voting for McAmnesty just to keep the Socialist Muslim out of power? To me, they are ALL “evil”. However, McLame has a track record—an awful, insidious track record and is a man who comes, shall we say, “unhinged” at times? Why would I put my vote behind such a man, a man who hates people like me, real conservatives who STAND for something? To vote for McDrain would be for me to vote for my mortal enemy.
The reason NOT to vote for McQueeg is because there is a good chance that conservatives/the GOP MAY be able to take back the House, thereby keeping amnesty from succeeding. With a McJerk as President, a GOP-controlled House will likely be like the Hastert House was—a rubber stamp for Bush most of the time. We can’t afford a “rubber stamp” for President McInsane!
Class dismissed!
DEAR JOHN
http://youtube.com/watch?v=WhGpIzH7N6Y
s/
Whats Obama going to do to seal the border?
Whats Obama going to do to stop Putin?
With every fly over the Nimitz the KGB does McInsane looks better.
Good post. I personally cannot recall a politician who held all of my beliefs. I want a leader.
I believe many of the people bashing McCain are not true conservatives anyway. Anybody who think there is an equivalence between McCain and Obama is not a conservative, and that includes all of those so-called conservatives from the media. Those media conservatives have no expertise in any field, other than whining when everything does not go exactly their way. Those people did not endorse anybody, then when McCain moved to the front they have attempted to undermine him in the general election.
If your house was going to be invaded by thugs, and there is absolutely no choice about it, which type of thugs would you rather be facing? A group of highschool bully types with metal pipes are option A.
A group of Serbian (work with me) military deserters with Kalashnikovs and a penchant for murdering people after gruesome torture is option B?
And option C is a group of Hutu savages thinking it is a redux of the Rwandan massacres of the early 90s and that you are a Tutsi, and with the simple thought of simply dismembering you and your family with machetes?
3 Groups ....and one of them has to come over.
And the key thing is ....ONE of those groups is coming to your house, no matter what (in much the same way that the next president, barring an act of God, will either be McCain, Clinton or Obama). In my opinion, McCain would be the highschool thugs, Clinton the Serbian mercs, and Obama the Hutu crowd. One of them will be president ....virtually guaranteed.
Thus the (very crude, I must admit) question. Of the three thug groups, if one of them was SURE to come to your house, and you could chose which one was a-knocking, which group would it be? Personally I'd take the highschool thugs, but it seems like some are willing to select the Serbian mercs or the Hutu crazies.
NOTE: McCain has MAJOR flaws, and at best he is a Rino. I just wonder whether or not a Rino is not at least better than a choice of two Commies, with the difference being that one of them comes with Bill Clinton, and the other comes with an ideological mindset that would even make pre Soviet collapse commies grimace. In my book the Rino is better, but if people would rather have Billary, or Hussein, then by all means have at it.
Personally I'd rather drink flat soda than choose between hemlock and cynanide, and with such a choice the flat soda would seem like heavenly mead.
I don’t vote for liberals.
I’ll wait for a decent third choice. If none emerges, I’ll not vote for President.
Any truth to the rumor that McCai and the RNC are trying to get the presidential ballots changed?
The proposed wording change:
Old Ballot: VOTE FOR ONE OF THESE CANDIDATES
New Ballot: MARK THE BOX NEXT TO THE CANDIDATE YOU DISLIKE THE LEAST
The correct word in this sentence is 'than', not 'then'. And no, my country is more important; that's why I will never vote for a backstabbing, egotistical, inside-the-beltway, unstable little man like John McCain. I don't want him anywhere near the nuclear football, much less the Oval Office. But thanks for asking!
You cannot have a country without BORDERS!
It's amazing how so many moan and whine about those they claim put "party" over "principle", but then will put "pet ideology" over country.
I have to respectfully disagree with Rush in that the medicine may be far worse than the disease. We have to put our differences aside and realize that even two years of a Rat Congress with either of these two closet marxists at the helm could do permanent damage to the country, i.e. capitulation to jihad, crippling socialist tax programs, and more libs on the Supreme Court.
I will NOT vote for a SOROS bought and paid for candidate, NO matter what political mantle they seek shelter. Educate yourself to what SOROS policies are and that is what is on the ballot this year.
In McCain you have both elements of Marxism and a willingness to sell his soul to big business. That's a double-barrel whammy.
Well put.
[So as distasteful as it will be to vote for McCain, to allow either Marxist, Hitlery or Obama, to win is to sell out my country.]
To vote for the socialist McCain is worse than Obama as it is a surrender to the marxist liberals rinos.
i’m holding my nose and voting for mccain.