Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Rasmussen Daily Presidential Tracking Poll
Rasmussenreports.com ^ | 2/13/08 | Rasmussen Reports

Posted on 02/14/2008 7:36:25 AM PST by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

The Rasmussen Reports daily Presidential Tracking Poll for Wednesday shows—for the first time ever—Barack Obama leading Hillary Clinton in the race for the Democratic Presidential Nomination

(Excerpt) Read more at rasmussenreports.com ...


TOPICS: Extended News
KEYWORDS: obama
Also on Drudge, today's national poll by Rasmussen: Obama 49 Clinton 37.
1 posted on 02/14/2008 7:36:27 AM PST by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

can one say, “President Obama”


2 posted on 02/14/2008 7:37:04 AM PST by barneyrubble
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

SCHADENFREUDE ALERT.


3 posted on 02/14/2008 7:37:19 AM PST by Keith (ANY REPUBLICAN in 2008 -- it's about defeating Mrs. Bill Clinton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: barneyrubble

She is going to win Ohio and Texas. Good news!


4 posted on 02/14/2008 7:39:37 AM PST by moderate_conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: barneyrubble

I dunno, momentum like this —
Obama 2 pts behind on the 12th, 5 pts ahead yesterday, 12 pts ahead today -—

that looks too dramatic to last until March (Texas, Ohio). Besides, she’s crooked. She’ll find a way to cut him down.


5 posted on 02/14/2008 7:41:20 AM PST by 668 - Neighbor of the Beast ( Peel back tabs for tagline. Do not remove this label. Obey.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: barneyrubble

I do not buy an inevitable democrat (Obama) win. Nor will I accept such a notion out of hand.

The fact is, we as conservatives are not getting what we hoped for or wanted in a candidate in this election. Most of that fault lies with us and with those we elected to go and do our business. Us for not holding their feet to the fire, and then not getting behind any single candidate for President to help do something about it (as in lead), and many of the GOP candidates elected earlier who got to DC and then made “nice” with the opposition and did not do the work we sent them there to do.

Be that as it may, things are what they are right now and we are left to make the most of it.

I do not believe or buy into any notion of capitulation or thowing my toys down and “going home” as a plan or policy for addressing it. Even with the candidate we have, there is simply too much at stake.

In particular, we can still hold ground in all of the following areas:

1) Abortion. McCain has a good record on supporting the life of any fetus in the womb. We owe it to those millions of innocenets to not throw in the towel here and add those lives to the other areas we will lose ground in.

2) The Supreme Court. McCain is much more likely to appoint judges onto the court who will make decisions based on the original intent of the founders than anything Hillary or Obama will appoint. In the abortion area this is critical because we are on the verge of being able to have the SCOTUS overturn Roe v Wade. This has taken 35 years to occur. I am not willing to sacrifice those 35 years and have to wait another 35 to get back where we are today.

3) The War against Islamic Jihad. McCane will stay on the offensive in this war. He may not do it exactly according to our liking (neither did Bush), but he will take the fight tenatiously to the enemy...something we definitely will not get from Obama or Hillary. Hundreds of thousands, maby millions of American lives could depend on this

4) Tax cuts. I believe McCain will keep his pledge to make the Bush tax cuts permanent. He has stated that directly (as opposed to the continued wishy washy language IMHO and action on border issues). This will be critical for us economically and we know exactly that Obama or Hillary will do the opposite.

So, despite the areas where we will lose ground with McCain (and immigration, the border, and global climate are chief amongst those), there are other equally critical areas IMHO where we can still hold high ground. And from that high ground I believe we can mount a counter offensive on the other issues (particularly immigration and global climate) where we differ with McCain. We have shown we can do that already and must continue to fight him directly, remaining in his and the liberals face, while holding the other critical ground.

I am unwilling to cede ALL the ground. Capitulating, staying home, or voting for one of the other cretans will do that and it is something I simply cannot subscribne to.


6 posted on 02/14/2008 7:42:11 AM PST by Jeff Head (Freedom is not free...never has been, never will be. (www.dragonsfuryseries.com))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast

Scortched earth perhaps?


7 posted on 02/14/2008 7:42:36 AM PST by tirednvirginia
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
McCain Advisor Won’t Fight Obama.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1970086/posts

McCain’s own staff supporting the Dims, lol.

8 posted on 02/14/2008 7:47:46 AM PST by roses of sharon (Who will be McCain's maverick?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 668 - Neighbor of the Beast
McCain[] is viewed favorably by 48% and unfavorably by 49%.

Ask not for whom the bell tolls . . .

9 posted on 02/14/2008 7:55:47 AM PST by Greg F (I feel a thrill going up my leg when Laura Ingraham speaks. Am I as weird as Chris Matthews?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: roses of sharon
Extreme Change -
2/10 Clinton 49-41 Obama
2/14 Obama 49-37 Clinton
Swing of 20 points in 5 days

Click on Chelsea
10 posted on 02/14/2008 7:59:37 AM PST by BigEdLB (BigEd)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: BigEdLB

LOL, polls are results of good press, yawn.

If the MSM wanted Clinton, they would killing Oprah’s Kid, it is that simple.

It’s only been 40 years of liberal MSM dominance, and here we sit doing nothing to compete.


11 posted on 02/14/2008 8:04:22 AM PST by roses of sharon (Who will be McCain's maverick?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: BigEdLB

What do you make of that swing? So huge that it must be false, or amazing but true?


12 posted on 02/14/2008 8:05:19 AM PST by ProfessorGage
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: barneyrubble
Chelsea asked an uncommitted voter what bothered her in this campaign and the answer was “Osama, Obama and Yo Momma.”
13 posted on 02/14/2008 8:14:04 AM PST by Positive (Nothing is sadder than to see a beautiful theory murdered by a gang of brutal facts.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head
I am unwilling to cede ALL the ground. Capitulating, staying home, or voting for one of the other cretans will do that and it is something I simply cannot subscribne to.

I absolutely agree. We can only hope the tantrum ends before November. We had a primary. The results are in. That's that. Your points for McCain are right on target, but good luck convincing people. I really don't get it. It's as if they never had to settle for a candidate they didn't like before. That's all I EVER do! I totally SETTLED for incompetent GWB, but I don't regret it. Would John Kerry have been better???

14 posted on 02/14/2008 8:17:06 AM PST by Huck (Buzzards gotta eat, same as worms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Jeff Head

I’m with you.

The next president will be either a Jimmy Carter (Obama), a Lyndon Johnson (Hillary), or an Eisenhower (the RINO war hero who beat out the more conservative Robert Taft for the Republican nomination).

I disagree that the Carter & Johnson wannabes are invincible, or that they would govern better.


15 posted on 02/14/2008 8:21:12 AM PST by sanchmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Huck

I agree with you. Letting Obama or Hillary win will completely destroy this nation. Obama doesn’t even know what a president does. (if you read my other posts, I point this out a lot. It scares the heck out of me)

Do we really want someone like him in there?


16 posted on 02/14/2008 8:22:32 AM PST by imskylark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: imskylark
Do we really want someone like him in there?

Some are saying they will VOTE for the DEM this year. Lemmings.

17 posted on 02/14/2008 8:28:53 AM PST by Huck (Buzzards gotta eat, same as worms.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: imskylark
Obama's tendency to press the wrong button:
During his eight years in state office, Obama cast more than 4,000 votes. Of those, according to transcripts of the proceedings in Springfield, he hit the wrong button at least six times...
"I was not aware that I had voted no," he said that day in June 2002, asking that the record be changed to reflect that he "intended to vote yes."...
Hey, no big deal. It's not like the biggest, most devastating decision a president could make is represented by the metaphor of "pushing the button."

18 posted on 02/14/2008 8:51:49 AM PST by sanchmo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson